Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Systematic-Narrative Review of Online Proctoring Systems and a Case for Open Standards Cover

A Systematic-Narrative Review of Online Proctoring Systems and a Case for Open Standards

By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. Arnò, S., Galassi, A., Tommasi, M., Saggino, A., & Vittorini, P. (2021). State-of-the-Art of Commercial Proctoring Systems and Their Use in Academic Online Exams: International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(2), 5576. 10.4018/IJDET.20210401.oa3
  2. Aurelia, S., Thanuja, R., Chowdhury, S., & Hu, Y.-C. (2023). AI-based online proctoring: A review of the state-of-the-art techniques and open challenges. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 10.1007/s11042-023-16714-x
  3. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  4. Breitkreuz, R. (2022). The gold standard: Epistemologically, ecologically informed research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100345. 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100345
  5. Brown, M., & Klein, C. (2023). Data Justice Now: Why We Need Technologies Built for Care and How You Can Advocate for Change. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 10864822231195579. 10.1177/10864822231195579
  6. Celeste, E., & Gregorio, G. D. (2023). Towards a Right to Digital Education? Constitutional Challenges of Edtech. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/42312
  7. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
  8. Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 1640316429. 10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x
  9. Coghlan, S., Miller, T., & Paterson, J. (2021). Good Proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 15811606. 10.1007/s13347-021-00476-1
  10. Dawson, P. (2020). Assessment security. In P. Dawson (Ed.), Defending Assessment Security in a Digital World (1st ed., pp. 1937). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429324178-2
  11. Dawson, P. (2023). Remote Proctoring: Understanding the Debate. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 116). Springer Nature Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_150-1
  12. Duval, E., & Verbert, K. (2008). On the Role of Technical Standards for Learning Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1(4), 229234. 10.1109/TLT.2009.6
  13. European Commission (n.d.). What is a data controller or data processor? https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/obligations/controllerprocessor/what-data-controller-or-data-processor_en, accessed 12/02/2024
  14. Fidas, C. A., Belk, M., Constantinides, A., Portugal, D., Martins, P., Pietron, A. M., Pitsillides, A., & Avouris, N. (2023). Ensuring Academic Integrity and Trust in Online Learning Environments: A Longitudinal Study of an AI-Centered Proctoring System in Tertiary Educational Institutions. Education Sciences, 13(6), 566. 10.3390/educsci13060566
  15. Forero-Corba, W., & Negre Bennasar, F. (2023). Techniques and applications of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in education: A systematic review. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 209253. 10.5944/ried.27.1.37491
  16. Foster, D., & Layman, H. (2013). Online Proctoring Systems Compared. https://caveon.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Online-Proctoring-Systems-Compared-Mar-13-2013.pdf
  17. Giannopoulou, A., Ducato, R., Angiolini, C., & Schneider, G. (2023). From data subjects to data suspects: Challenging e-proctoring systems as a university practice. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 14(2), 278306. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4498632
  18. Grech, A., Sood, I., & Ariño, L. (2021). Blockchain, Self-Sovereign Identity and Digital Credentials: Promise Versus Praxis in Education. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4, 616779. 10.3389/fbloc.2021.616779
  19. Hecker, J., & Kalpokas, N. (n.d.). The Guide to Literature Reviews: What is a Narrative Literature Review? Retrieved April 17, 2025, from https://atlasti.com/guides/literature-review/narrative-literature-review
  20. Henry, J. V., & Oliver, M. (2022). Who Will Watch the Watchmen? The Ethico-political Arrangements of Algorithmic Proctoring for Academic Integrity. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(2), 330353. 10.1007/s42438-021-00273-1
  21. Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1). 10.1177/2053951720982012
  22. Hussein, M. J., Yusuf, J., Deb, A. S., Fong, L., & Naidu, S. (2020). An Evaluation of Online Proctoring Tools. Open Praxis, 12(4), 509. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1113
  23. Khanna, V., Brodiya, S., & Chaudhary, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence based automated exam proctoring system. 08(12).
  24. Koper, R. (2008). Open source and open standards. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3rd ed).
  25. Laamanen, M., Ladonlahti, T., Uotinen, S., Okada, A., Bañeres, D., & Koçdar, S. (2021). Acceptability of the e-authentication in higher education studies: Views of students with special educational needs and disabilities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 4. 10.1186/s41239-020-00236-9
  26. Labayen, M., Vea, R., Florez, J., Aginako, N., & Sierra, B. (2021). Online Student Authentication and Proctoring System Based on Multimodal Biometrics Technology. IEEE Access, 9, 7239872411. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079375
  27. McKenna, S. (2022). Neoliberalism’s conditioning effects on the university and the example of proctoring during COVID-19 and since. Journal of Critical Realism, 21(5), 502515. 10.1080/14767430.2022.2100612
  28. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model Cards for Model Reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 220229. 10.1145/3287560.3287596
  29. Motwani, S., Nagpal, C., Motwani, M., Nagdev, N., & Yeole, A. (2021). AI-Based Proctoring System for Online Tests. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.3866446
  30. Najar, G. A., & Ahmad, M. N. (2024). A Review on Factors Affecting the Success of Online Proctoring System. Journal of Information Systems Research and Practice, 2(2), 5670. Retrieved from https://ijie.um.edu.my/index.php/JISRP/article/view/53561
  31. Nicola-Richmond, K., Dawson, P., & Partridge, H. (2024). Online proctored exams: Rhetoric vs reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 392405. 10.1080/07294360.2023.2234310
  32. Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., & Churi, P. (2021). A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 64216445. 10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x
  33. Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerrero-Roldán, A. (2019). Pedagogical approaches for e-assessment with authentication and authorship verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 32643282. 10.1111/bjet.12733
  34. Paul, J. S., Farhath, O., & Selvan, M. P. (2024). AI based Proctoring System – A Review. 2024 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), 15. 10.1109/ICICT60155.2024.10544779
  35. Portugal, D., Faria, J. N., Belk, M., Martins, P., Constantinides, A., Pietron, A., Pitsillides, A., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. A. (2023). Continuous user identification in distance learning: A recent technology perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 38. 10.1186/s40561-023-00255-9
  36. Sedlmeir, J., Smethurst, R., Rieger, A., & Fridgen, G. (2021). Digital Identities and Verifiable Credentials. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(5), 603613. 10.1007/s12599-021-00722-y
  37. Selwyn, N., O’Neill, C., Smith, G., Andrejevic, M., & Gu, X. (2023). A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia, 186(1), 149164. 10.1177/1329878X211005862
  38. Slusky, L. (2020). Cybersecurity of Online Proctoring Systems. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 29(1), 5683. 10.58729/1941-6679.1445
  39. Soltani, R., Nguyen, U. T., & An, A. (2021). A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem. Security and Communication Networks, 126. 10.1155/2021/8873429
  40. Somavarapu, J., Biswas, S. Kr., Purkayastha, B., Abhisheka, B., & Potluri, T. (2024). Advancements and Challenges in Fully Automated Online Proctoring Systems: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Solutions. In T. Senjyu, C. So–In, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Smart Trends in Computing and Communications (Vol. 947, pp. 199212). Springer Nature Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-97-1326-4_17
  41. Swauger, S. (2020). Our Bodies Encoded: Algorithmic Test Proctoring in Higher Education. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/our-bodies-encoded-algorithmic-test-proctoring-in-higher-education/
  42. Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2023). Systematic-narrative hybrid literature review: A strategy for integrating a concise methodology into a manuscript. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100381. 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100381
  43. Tweissi, A., Al Etaiwi, W., & Al Eisawi, D. (2022). The Accuracy of AI-Based Automatic Proctoring in Online Exams. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(4), 419435. 10.34190/ejel.20.4.2600
  44. Walters, L. (2021, November 6). Universities expand controversial AI monitoring of students taking online exams. Stuff. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/126908715/universities-expand-controversial-ai-monitoring-of-students-taking-online-exams
  45. Whitelock, D., Edwards, C., & Okada, A. (2020). Can e-Authentication Raise the Confidence of Both Students and Teachers in Qualifications Granted Through the e-Assessment Process? Journal of Learning for Development, 7(1), 4660. 10.56059/jl4d.v7i1.384
  46. Zeide, E. (2023). Big proctor: Online proctoring problems and how FERPA can promote student data due process. Notre Dame Journal on Emerging Technologies, 3(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4336557
Language: English
Page range: 485 - 499
Submitted on: Jan 21, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 17, 2025
Published on: Aug 11, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Eva Heinrich, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.