Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Advancing Students’ Academic Excellence in Distance Education: Exploring the Potential of Generative AI Integration to Improve Academic Writing Skills Cover

Advancing Students’ Academic Excellence in Distance Education: Exploring the Potential of Generative AI Integration to Improve Academic Writing Skills

Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 113. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
  2. Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15, ep429. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13152
  3. Alam, A. (2021). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) (pp. 18). DOI: 10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697272
  4. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2022). Facial analytics or virtual avatars: competencies and design considerations for student-teacher interaction in AI-powered online education for effective classroom engagement. In International Conference on Communication, Networks and Computing, 252265. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-43145-6_21
  5. Aljohani, R. A. (2021). Teachers and students’ perceptions on the impact of artificial intelligence on English language learning in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(1), 3647. https://jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1156
  6. Allal, L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of—or in—the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 137152. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00025-0
  7. Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.006
  8. Asiamah, N., Mensah, H., & Oteng-Abayie, E. F. (2017). General, target, and accessible population: Demystifying the concepts for effective sampling. The Qualitative Report, 22(6), 16071621. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2674
  9. Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal of Education, 5, 1610016106. DOI: 10.31004/joe.v5i4.2745
  10. Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Weld, D. S., Lasecki, W. S., & Horvitz, E. (2019). Updates in human AI teams: Understanding and addressing the performance/compatibility trade-off. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 24292437. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012429
  11. Baskara, R. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343358. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1391490.pdf
  12. Bell, S. (2023). The write algorithm: Promoting responsible artificial intelligence usage and accountability in academic writing. BMC Medicine, 21(1), 334. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2674
  13. Bennani, S., Maalel, A., & Ben Ghezala, H. (2022). Adaptive gamification in E-learning: A literature review and future challenges. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 628642. DOI: 10.1002/cae.22477
  14. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, authorship, ownership, academic ethics and integrity in a time of generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  15. Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
  16. Cai, Q., Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Factors Influencing Learner Attitudes Towards ChatGPT-Assisted Language Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 115. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725
  17. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652661. DOI: 10.1177/1744987120927206
  18. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  19. Chang, D. H., Lin, M. P. C., Hajian, S., & Wang, Q. Q. (2023). Educational design principles of using AI chatbot that supports self-regulated learning in education: Goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Sustainability, 15(17), 12921. DOI: 10.3390/su151712921
  20. Chang, W. L., & Sun, Y. C. (2009). Scaffolding and web concordancers as support for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 283302. DOI: 10.1080/09588220903184518
  21. Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
  22. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 112. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  23. Dahlin, E. (2021). Email interviews: A guide to research design and implementation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. DOI: 10.1177/16094069211025453
  24. Dehouche, N. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 21, 1723. DOI: 10.3354/esep00195
  25. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615622. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
  26. Dey, S. (2021). Reports of cheating at colleges soar during the pandemic. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/08/27/1031255390/reports-of-cheating-at-colleges-soar-during-the-pandemic
  27. Don, Y. (2021). Automated writing evaluation for ESL learners: A case study of Pigai system. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(3), 949958. DOI: 10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.3.14.949
  28. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., & Wright, R. (2023). “So, what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  29. Eaton, S. E., Mindzak, M., & Morrison, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence, algorithmic writing & educational ethics. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Werklund School of Education. DOI: 10.11575/PRISM/38967
  30. Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. Journal of English Language, 12(1), 4458. DOI: 10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
  31. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627660. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0057
  32. Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A., & Ramasamy, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 12. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
  33. Griffin, R. (Ed.) (2016). Faces of Anonymity: Anonymous and Pseudonymous Publication, 16002000. Springer. https://books.google.co.za/books/about/Faces_of_Anonymity.html?id=HlQBDgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
  34. Hall, E., Chai, W., & Albrecht, J. A. (2016). A qualitative phenomenological exploration of teachers’ experience with nutrition education. American Journal of Health Education, 47(3), 136148. DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2016.1157532
  35. Hassan, I., Madarina Abdul Rahman, A., & Nazri Latiff Azmi, M. (2021). Development of English writing skills through blended learning among ESL learners in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), Special Issue on CALL, 377389. DOI: 10.24093/awej/call7.26
  36. Hibert, A. I. (2019). Systematic literature review of automated writing evaluation as a formative learning tool. In: Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies: 14th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2019, Delft, The Netherlands, September 16–19, 2019, Proceedings, 14, 199212. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_15
  37. Huang, F., Jiafu, Q., & Ailin, X. (2022). Sustaining Teaching with Technology after the Quarantine: Evidence from Chinese EFL Teachers’ Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14), 113. DOI: 10.3390/su14148774
  38. Hunt, N., & McHale, S. (2007). A practical guide to the e-mail interview. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 14151421. DOI: 10.1177/1049732307308761
  39. Ilham, I., Musthafa, B., & Yusuf, F. N. (2020). University students’ needs of writing course materials: A case of Indonesia. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 31. DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v8i2.2988
  40. Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT. Global Journal of Management and Administration, 3, 97111. DOI: 10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163
  41. Jeon, J. (2022). Exploring a self-directed interactive app for informal EFL learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 57675787. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10839-y
  42. Jain, R., Garg, N., & Khera, S. N. (2023). Effective human–AI work design for collaborative decision-making. Kybernetes, 52(11), 50175040. DOI: 10.1108/K-04-2022-0548
  43. Khabib, S. (2022). Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(2), 114124. DOI: 10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249
  44. Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 475487). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/fnh48
  45. Khalo, K. E. (2021). The Reading and Writing Centre at the University of Limpopo: Towards the Development of the Academic Writing Skills of the First Entering Human Dietetics Students. MA: University of Limpopo: Faculty of Humanities-English Studies- School of Languages and Communication Studies.
  46. Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023). ChatGPT – A challenging tool for the university professors in their teaching practice. Educ. Sci., 13, 1056. DOI: 10.3390/educsci13101056
  47. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal. DOI: 10.1177/00336882231162868
  48. Koka, N. A., Khan, A. S., & Jan, N. (2023). Exploring the attitudes and perceptions of foreign language lecturers on artificial intelligence-driven writing evaluation and feedback tools for improving undergraduate writing skills. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 58(5). DOI: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.6
  49. Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
  50. Lantolf, J. P. (1993). Sociocultural theory and the second language classroom: The lesson of strategic interaction. In Strategic Interaction and Language Acquisition: Theory Practice and Research (pp. 220233).
  51. Lentz, G. S. (2020). Blended Learning as an Academic Writing Intervention Programme for First Year Students’ Academic Writing. MA dissertation in education. Faculty of Education, Cape Peninsula University of Technology. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1328452.pdf
  52. Lin, Z. (2023). Supercharging Academic Writing with Generative AI: Framework, Techniques, and Caveats. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/9yhwz
  53. Lukowicz, P. (2023). Towards responsible AI: Developing explanations to increase human-AI collaboration. In HHAI 2023: Augmenting Human Intellect: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Hybrid Human-Artificial Intelligence (pp. 368470). IOS Press. https://www.iospress.com/catalog/books/hhai-2023-augmenting-human-intellect
  54. Mahmud, H., Islam, A. N., Ahmed, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390
  55. Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
  56. McLean, G., & Osei-Frimpong, K. (2019). Hey Alexa… examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 2837. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009
  57. McLean, S., Read, G. J., Thompson, J., Baber, C., Stanton, N. A., & Salmon, P. M. (2023). The risks associated with artificial general intelligence: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 35(5), 649663. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009
  58. Miles, D. A. (2017). Let’s stop the madness part 2: Understanding the difference between limitations vs. delimitations. In Workshop]. Black Doctoral Network Conference, Atlanta, GA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334279571
  59. Mohale, N. E. (2023). Exploring first-year students’ perceptions and challenges of using podcasts and vodcasts to enhance academic writing skills: An action research study in an ODeL institution in South Africa. PhD Thesis. UNISA, Department of English Studies, South Africa.
  60. Mphahlele, A., & McKenna, S. (2019). The use of Turnitin in the higher education sector: Decoding the myth. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 10791089. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1573971
  61. Naidu, K., & Sevnarayan, K. (2023). ChatGPT: An ever-increasing encroachment of artificial intelligence in online assessment in distance education. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(1), e202336. DOI: 10.30935/ojcmt/13291
  62. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
  63. Nguyen, Q. H. (2023). AI and plagiarism: Opinion from teachers, administrators and policymakers. Proceedings of the Asia. CALL International Conference, 4, 7585. ISSN: 2833–6836. ISBN: 979-8-9870112-4-9. DOI: 10.54855/paic.2346
  64. Palermo, C., & Wilson, J. (2020). Implementing automated writing evaluation in different instructional contexts: A mixed- methods study. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 63108. DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.04
  65. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 07. DOI: 10.53761/1.20.02.07
  66. Ponelis, S. R. (2015). Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of information systems research in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 535. DOI: 10.28945/2339
  67. Qiao, H., & Zhao, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based language learning: illuminating the impact on speaking skills and self-regulation in Chinese EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255594
  68. Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A Review of AI-Powered Writing Tools and Their Implications for Academic Integrity in the Language Classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), Article 3. DOI: 10.59588/2961-3094.1035
  69. Sağlamel, H., & Aydoğdu, Z. M. (2022). The academic writing needs of students: A case study on stakeholder perspectives. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy. Literature, and Culture, 7. DOI: 10.35974/acuity.v7i2.2541
  70. Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare, 11(6), 887. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060887
  71. Schmohl, T., Watanabe, A., Fröhlich, N., & Herzberg, D. (2020). How Artificial Intelligence can improve the Academic Writing of Students. In Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education 2020. https://conference.pixel-online.net/files/foe/ed0010/FP/6789-GAME4769-FP-FOE10.pdf
  72. Scott, S., & Palincsar, A. S. (2013). The historical roots of sociocultural theory. Sociocultural Theory. https://www.dr-hatfield.com/theorists/resources/sociocultural_theory.pdf
  73. Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., De Vreede, T., De Vreede, G. J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiß, S., Randrup, N., & Schwabe, G. (2020). Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information & Management, 57(2), 103174. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103174
  74. Sevnarayan, K., & Maphoto, K. B. 2024. Exploring the Dark Side of Online Distance Learning: Cheating Behaviours, Contributing Factors, and Strategies to Enhance the Integrity of Online Assessment. Journal of Academic Ethics. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-023-09501-8
  75. Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237248. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
  76. Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 3348. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
  77. Tao, B., Díaz, V. & Guerra, Y. (2019). Artificial intelligence and education, challenges and disadvantages for the teacher. Arct. J., 72, 3050. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vianney-Perez/publication/338236746_2019_7212_30/
  78. Tasker, T. J., & Cisneroz, A. (2019). Open-ended questions in qualitative research. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 21(1/2), 119122. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2283917255?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
  79. Van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224226. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
  80. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320330. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
  81. Wilder, N., Weßels, D., Gröpler, J., Klein, A., & Mundorf, M. (2021). Who is responsible for integrity in the age of artificial intelligence? An analysis using the example of academic writing. European Conference on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism, 2021, 179181. https://www.sai.ucg.ac.me/dokumentacija/book_of_abstracts2021.pdf#page=179
  82. Woithe, J., & Filipec, O. (2023). Understanding the Adoption, Perception, and Learning Impact of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A qualitative exploratory case study analyzing students’ perspectives and experiences with the AI-based large language model. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1762617/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  83. Wright-St Clair, V. (2014). Doing (interpretive) phenomenology. In Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy, 5369. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203383216-14
  84. Xu, W., Dainoff, M. J., Ge, L., & Gao, Z. (2023). Transitioning to human interaction with AI systems: New challenges and opportunities for HCI professionals to enable human-centered AI. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 494518. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900
  85. Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in an L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 125. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
  86. Zhou, W. (2020). Sociocultural Theory and Its Implications in College English Teaching and Learning in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1646(1), 012142. IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1646/1/012142
  87. Zulfa, S., Dewi, R. S., Hidayat, D. N., Hamid, F., & Defianty, M. (2023). The Use of AI and Technology Tools in Developing Students’ English Academic Writing Skills. International Conference on Education, 4763. https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/1811
Language: English
Page range: 142 - 159
Submitted on: Jan 7, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 24, 2024
Published on: Apr 3, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Kgabo Bridget Maphoto, Kershnee Sevnarayan, Ntshimane Elphas Mohale, Zuleika Suliman, Tumelo Jacquiline Ntsopi, Douglas Mokoena, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.