Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assistant, Parrot, or Colonizing Loudspeaker? ChatGPT Metaphors for Developing Critical AI Literacies Cover

Assistant, Parrot, or Colonizing Loudspeaker? ChatGPT Metaphors for Developing Critical AI Literacies

Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Anderson, S. S. (2023). “Places to stand”: Multiple metaphors for framing ChatGPT’s corpus. Computers and Composition, 68, 102778. DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102778
  2. Bali, M. (2023, April 24). Tweet. https://t.co/1VkxHBYfVP [Tweet]. Twitter/X. https://twitter.com/Bali_Maha/status/1650582997614092288
  3. Bender, E. M. (2022, April 18). On NYT magazine on AI: Resist the urge to be impressed. Medium. https://medium.com/@emilymenonbender/on-nyt-magazine-on-ai-resist-the-urge-to-be-impressed-3d92fd9a0edd
  4. Bender, E. M. (2023, July 29). “Ensuring Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI”: What those seven companies avoided committing to. Medium. https://medium.com/@emilymenonbender/ensuring-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-ai-what-those-seven-companies-avoided-committing-to-8c297f9d71a
  5. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021, March). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 610623). DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445922
  6. Chiang, T. (2023, February 9). ChatGPT Is a blurry JPEG of the web. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web
  7. Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. LeftCoast Press.
  8. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589
  9. Geist-Martin, P., Gates, L., Weiring, L. M., Kirby, E., Houston, R., Lilly, A., & Moreno, J. (2010). Exemplifying collaborative autoethnographic practice via shared stories of mothering. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1). http://jrp.icaap.org/%20index.php/jrp/article/view/209/187
  10. Johnson, G. (2023). Don’t Act Like You Forgot: Approaching Another Literacy “Crisis” by (Re)Considering What We Know about Teaching Writing with and through Technologies. Composition Studies, 51(1), 169175.
  11. Hannigan, T., McCarthy I. P., & Spicer, A. (2024, forthcoming). Beware of botshit: How to manage the epistemic risks of generative chatbots. Business Horizons. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4678265
  12. Khadpe, P., Krishna, R., Fei-Fei, L., Hancock, J. T., & Bernstein, M. S. (2020). Conceptual metaphors impact perceptions of human-AI collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 126. DOI: 10.1145/3415234
  13. Kirschenbaum, M. (2023). Prepare for the Textpocalypse. The Atlantic, 8. https://rws511.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/154164033/Kirschenbaum%20Prepare%20for%20the%20Textpocalypse.pdf
  14. Klee, M. (2023, May 17). Professor Flunks All His Students After ChatGPT Falsely Claims It Wrote Their Papers. Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/texas-am-chatgpt-ai-professor-flunks-students-false-claims-1234736601/
  15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 (Original work published 1980).
  16. Lukeš, D. (2019). Explanation is an event, understanding is a process: How (not) to explain anything with metaphor. Metaphor Hacker. https://metaphorhacker.net/2019/05/explanation-is-an-event-understanding-is-a-process-how-not-to-explain-anything-with-metaphor/
  17. Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. Signs, 16(3), 485501. DOI: 10.1086/494680
  18. Mills, A(Curator). (2022). AI Text Generators and Teaching Writing: Starting Points For Inquiry. https://wac.colostate.edu/repository/collections/ai-text-generators-and-teaching-writing-starting-points-for-inquiry/. Last Updated November 18, 2023.
  19. Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). DOI: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34
  20. Mollick, E. (2023, May 9). AI is not good software, it is pretty good people. [Weblog post]. One useful thing. https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/ai-is-not-good-software-it-is-pretty
  21. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
  22. Nixon, J. (2012). Interpretive pedagogies for higher education: Arendt, Berger, Said, Nussbaum and their legacies. Bloomsbury.
  23. Owusu-Ansah, A. L. (2023). Defining moments, definitive programs, and the continued erasure of missing people. Composition Studies, 51(1), 143148.
  24. Pierre, E., & Oughton, J. (2007). The affective domain: Undiscovered country. College Quarterly, 10(4), 17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ813766
  25. Raffaghelli, J. E., Manca, S., Stewart, B., Prinsloo, P., & Sangrà, A. (2020). Supporting the development of critical data literacies in higher education: Building blocks for fair data cultures in society. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 58. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00235-w
  26. Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: Identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 14. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3
  27. Richardson, L. (1997). Fields Of Play: Constructing An Academic Life. L Rutgers University Press.
  28. Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), pp. 137163. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011
  29. Selber, S. (2004). Multiliteracies For A Digital Age. Southern Illinois University Press.
  30. Tham, J. C. K., Burnham, K. D., Hocutt, D. L., Ranade, N., Misak, J., Duin, A. H., Pedersen, I., & Campbell, J. L. (2021). Metaphors, mental models, and multiplicity: Understanding student perception of digital literacy. Computers and Composition, 59, 102628. DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102628
  31. Trimbur, J. (1991). Literacy and the discourse of crisis.” In R. Bullock, & J. Trimbur (Eds.), The Politics of Writing Instruction: Postsecondary, pp. 277295. Heinemann.
  32. Wang, F., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Zhou, Y. (2023). University students’ intentions to learn artificial intelligence: The roles of supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 51. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00417-2
  33. Weller, M. (2022). Metaphors of Ed Tech. Athabasca University Press. DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781771993500.01
  34. Willson, S. (2023). Think of language models like ChatGPT as a “calculator for words.” [weblog post]. https://simonwillison.net/2023/Apr/2/calculator-for-words/
  35. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 53
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2023
Accepted on: Jan 8, 2024
Published on: Feb 2, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Anuj Gupta, Yasser Atef, Anna Mills, Maha Bali, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.