Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fibroglandular tissue and quantitative background parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance breast images are inversely correlated with menopause in Thai women Cover

Fibroglandular tissue and quantitative background parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance breast images are inversely correlated with menopause in Thai women

Open Access
|Jan 2017

References

  1. Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res. 2008; 10: 209.10.1186/bcr210218598375
  2. Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998; 209:511-8.10.1148/radiology.209.2.98075819807581
  3. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138:168-75.10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-0000812558355
  4. del Carmen MG, Halpern EF, Kopans DB, Moy B, Moore RH, Goss PE, et al. Mammographic breast density and race. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 1147-50.10.2214/AJR.06.061917377060
  5. Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G. Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30: 959-65.10.1093/ije/30.5.95911689504
  6. Kawashima H, Matsui O, Suzuki M, Kadoya M, Tawara M, Nonomura A, et al. Breast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11:233-43.10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200003)11:3<233::AID-JMRI1>3.0.CO;2-X10739554
  7. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology. 2007; 244:356-78.10.1148/radiol.244205162017641361
  8. Ko ES, Lee BH, Choi HY, Kim RB, Noh WC. Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound. Euro J Radiol. 2011; 80:719-23.10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.019
  9. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, Kreft BP, Sommer T, Lutterbey G, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology. 1997; 203:137-44.912238210.1148/radiology.203.1.9122382
  10. Cubuk R, Tasali N, Narin B, Keskiner F, Celik L, Guney S. Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography. La Radiol Medica. 2010; 115:434-41.10.1007/s11547-010-0513-4
  11. Jansen SA, Lin VC, Giger ML, Li H, Karczmar GS, Newstead GM. Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast. Euro Radiol. 2011; 21:1374-82.10.1007/s00330-011-2080-z
  12. Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Dietz K, Claussen CD. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology. 1997; 203:145-9.912238310.1148/radiology.203.1.9122383
  13. Scaranelo AM, Carrillo MC, Fleming R, Jacks LM, Kulkarni SR, Crystal P. Pilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast density. Radiology. 2013; 267: 692-700.2341800510.1148/radiol.13120121
  14. King V, Gu Y, Kaplan JB, Brooks JD, Pike MC, Morris EA. Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI. Euro Radiol. 2012; 22:2641-7.10.1007/s00330-012-2553-8
  15. DeMartini WB, Liu F, Peacock S, Eby PR, Gutierrez RL, Lehman CD. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: W373-80.2245157610.2214/AJR.10.6272
  16. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J. Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?. Euro Radiol. 2011; 21:2261-7.10.1007/s00330-011-2175-6
  17. Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, Lehman CD, Ikeda DM, Newstead GM, et al. ACR BI-RADS Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA : American College of Radiology. 2013.
  18. Molleran V, Mahoney MC. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010; 18:171-85.10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.00120494304
  19. Esserman L, Hylton N, George T, Weidner N. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast J. 1999; 5:13-21.1134825010.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001013.x
  20. Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198:W292-5.2235802810.2214/AJR.10.6049
  21. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S. Mammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer. J Brit Menopause Soc. 2006; 12:186-93.10.1258/136218006779160436
  22. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G, et al. Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15:2086-92.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-034517119032
  23. Khazen M, Warren RM, Boggis CR, Bryant EC, Reed S, Warsi I, et al. A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17:2268-74.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-254718768492
  24. Thompson DJ, Leach MO, Kwan-Lim G, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Warsi I, et al. Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer, the UK MARIBS study. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11:R80.10.1186/bcr2447
  25. Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF. Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Brit J Cancer. 1996; 73:162-8.10.1038/bjc.1996.30
  26. Lee NA, Rusinek H, Weinreb J, Chandra R, Toth H, Singer C, et al. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20–83 years old: comparison of x-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168:501-6.10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016235
  27. Iacconi C, Thakur SB, Dershaw DD, Brooks J, Fry CW, Morris EA. Impact of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging of breast lesions. Euro J Radiol. 2014; 83:2137-43.10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.004
  28. King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA. Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology. 2011; 260:50-60.10.1148/radiol.1110215621493794
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0904.422 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 519 - 526
Published on: Jan 31, 2017
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2017 Anchukorn Rijiravanich, Jatuporn Chayakulkheeree, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.