Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Management of Elevated Therapeutic Impedances on Deep Brain Stimulation Leads Cover

Management of Elevated Therapeutic Impedances on Deep Brain Stimulation Leads

Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
Volume 7 (2017): Issue 0
By: Wissam Deeb,  Amar Patel,  Michael S. Okun and  Aysegul Gunduz  
Open Access
|Sep 2017

References

  1. 1
    FarrisSVitekJGirouxMLDeep brain stimulation hardware complications: The role of electrode impedance and current measurementsMov Disord20082375560doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.2193618186117
    Back to article
  2. 2
    ButsonCRMaksCBMcIntyreCCSources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulationClin Neurophysiol200611744754doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.00716376143
    Back to article
  3. 3
    YangH-JYunJYKimYELimYHKimH-JPaekSHet alSudden loss of the deep brain stimulation effect with high impedance without macroscopic fracture: A case report and review of the published literatureNeuropsychiatr Dis Treat2015111799803doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S8612026229475
    Back to article
  4. 4
    BronsteinJMTagliatiMMcIntyreCChenRCheungTHargreavesELet alThe rationale driving the evolution of deep brain stimulation to constant-current devicesNeuromodulation201518858doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.1222725171762
    Back to article
  5. 5
    SatzerDMaurerEWLanctinDGuanWAboschAAnatomic correlates of deep brain stimulation electrode impedanceJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry201586398403doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-30728424935985
    Back to article
  6. 6
    PredaFCavandoliCLettieriCPilleriMAntoniniAEleopraRet alSwitching from constant voltage to constant current in deep brain stimulation: a multicenter experience of mixed implants for movement disordersEur J Neurol2016231905doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.1283526498428
    Back to article
  7. 7
    SamuraKMiyagiYOkamotoTHayamiTKishimotoJKatanoMet alShort circuit in deep brain stimulationJ Neurosurg201211795561doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2012.8.JNS11207322957525
    Back to article
  8. 8
    FernandezFSAlvarez VegaMAAntuna RamosAFernandez GonzalezFLozano AragonesesBLead fractures in deep brain stimulation during long-term follow-upPark Dis20102010409356doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/409356
    Back to article
  9. 9
    GuridiJRodriguez-OrozMCAlegreMObesoJAHardware complications in deep brain stimulation: Electrode impedance and loss of clinical benefitPark Relat Disord2012187659doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.03.014
    Back to article
  10. 10
    AllertNMarkouMMiskiewiczAANoldenLKarbeHElectrode dysfunctions in patients with deep brain stimulation: a clinical retrospective studyActa Neurochir (Wien)201115323439doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1187-y21989778
    Back to article
  11. 11
    LunguCMalonePWuTGhoshPMcElroyBZaghloulKet alTemporal macrodynamics and microdynamics of the postoperative impedance at the tissue-electrode interface in deep brain stimulation patientsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2014858169doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-30606624218525
    Back to article
  12. 12
    CheungTNuñoMHoffmanMKatzMKilbaneCAltermanRet alLongitudinal impedance variability in patients with chronically implanted DBS devicesBrain Stimul2013674651doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.03.01023619246
    Back to article
  13. 13
    HartmannCJWojteckiLVesperJVolkmannJGroissSJSchnitzlerAet alLong-term evaluation of impedance levels and clinical development in subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s diseasePark Relat Disord201521124750doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.07.019
    Back to article
  14. 14
    SatzerDLanctinDEberlyLEAboschAVariation in deep brain stimulation electrode impedance over years following electrode implantationStereotact Funct Neurosurg20149294102doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/00035801424503709
    Back to article
  15. 15
    LettieriCRinaldoSDevigiliGPisaFMucchiutMBelgradoEet alClinical outcome of deep brain stimulation for dystonia: constant-current or constant-voltage stimulation? A non-randomized studyEur J Neurol20152291926doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.1251525041419
    Back to article
  16. 16
    OkunMSGalloBVMandyburGJagidJFooteKDRevillaFJet alSubthalamic deep brain stimulation with a constant-current device in Parkinson’s disease: an open-label randomised controlled trialLancet Neurol2012111409doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70308-822239915
    Back to article
  17. 17
    Ramirez de NoriegaFEitanRMarmorOLaviALinetzkyEBergmanHet alConstant current versus constant voltage subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s diseaseStereotact Funct Neurosurg20159311421doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/00036844325721228
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.370 | Journal eISSN: 2160-8288
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 10, 2017
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2017
Published on: Sep 21, 2017
Published by: Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Therapeutic impedance,
lead integrity impedance,
deep brain stimulation,
open circuit,
short circuit,
constant current

© 2017 Wissam Deeb, Amar Patel, Michael S. Okun, Aysegul Gunduz, published by Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 7 (2017): Issue 0Next article