Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Overview of the methodological evolution, shared infrastructures, and main application areas of MIR, from music analysis and representation to interactive systems and generation.

Methodological EvolutionData and Software InfrastructuresMusic Analysis and RepresentationAccess, Interaction and PracticeMusic Generation
  • From hand‑crafted features to learned representations

  • Increasingly data‑intensive and large‑scale models

  • New challenges in interpretability, generalization, and evaluation

  • Audio, symbolic, textual, metadata, and multimodal resources

  • Shared datasets, repositories, and open‑source tools

  • Reproducible workflows and standardized evaluation

  • Openness constrained by copyright, access, and annotation costs

  • Growing emphasis on documentation, diversity, and coverage

  • Transcription, harmony, rhythm, structure, and similarity

  • Source separation and performance‑related analysis

  • Audio, symbolic, textual, visual, and multimodal representations

  • Support for inquiry, retrieval, education, and musicology

  • Validity dependent on musical and cultural context

  • Retrieval, recommendation, browsing, and visualization

  • Learning, performance, accompaniment, and creative support

  • Interactive systems emphasizing human control and collaboration

  • Access to and preservation of musical heritage

  • Symbolic, audio, and multimodal generation

  • Shared methods with analysis and representation learning

  • Shift in scale, accessibility, modality, and autonomy

  • Challenges in transparency, controllability, and reproducibility

Table 2

Indicative distinctions between exploratory research and commercial deployment in music‑AI; their boundaries vary across jurisdictions and use cases.

Exploratory ResearchCommercial Deployment
PurposeScientific exploration, methodological development, and validationOperational use, market delivery, and sustained user‑facing services
Scale and contextPrototypes, controlled studies, restricted access, and pre‑deployment testing; datasets and models may still be largeSystems placed on the market or put into service, often with broad access, continuous operation, and substantial impact
Legal contextMay benefit from research exceptions or exclusions, including text and data mining provisions, fair‑use interpretations, and some pre‑deployment activities under the EU AI Act; other laws still applySubject to applicable licensing, contractual, consumer‑protection, risk‑management, and sector‑specific requirements
ResponsibilitiesResearch integrity, documentation, reproducibility, ethical review, disclosure of limitations, and legal complianceLicensing, accountability, user transparency, risk management, monitoring, consumer protection, and regulatory compliance
EvaluationScientific validity, robustness, generalization, and reproducibilityReal‑world reliability, user impact, safety, fairness, and ongoing monitoring
Failure risksInvalid claims, misleading results, and wasted research resourcesHarm to users, creators, communities, markets, and public trust
Table 3

Proposed and interconnected principles for critically assessing current MIR research practices and guiding future work in trustworthy music‑AI.

TransparencyAccountabilityProvenanceSustainability
  • Assumptions, inputs, and limitations

  • Model architecture and design choices

  • Evaluation protocols and metrics

  • Biases, uncertainties, and intended use

  • Clear roles and responsibility

  • Documented datasets and pipelines

  • Reproducible experiments and appropriate benchmarks

  • Failure cases, negative results, and correction

  • Data origin, licensing, and attribution

  • Curation and annotation procedures

  • Preprocessing, augmentation, cleaning, and deduplication

  • Model lineage and output traceability

  • Computational and energy awareness

  • Model scale and resource reporting

  • Maintenance, governance, and stewardship

  • Long‑term accessibility of data, tools, benchmarks, and educational resources

Table 4

Six interconnected and mutually reinforcing priority areas for advancing trustworthy music‑AI that is open, culturally inclusive, and ethically grounded.

Mission‑Oriented CollaborationSustainable Open InfrastructuresRigorous and Context‑Sensitive EvaluationCultural Diversity and ResponsibilityEngagement Across Research, Industry, Policy, and SocietyInterdisciplinary Education and Capacity‑Building
  • Grand challenges for music‑AI

  • Shared research agendas and priorities

  • Long‑term interdisciplinary programs

  • Co‑design with musicians and communities

  • Community governance and impact assessment

  • Open datasets, models, tools, and resources

  • Interoperable and open‑source infrastructures

  • FAIR, documentation, and quality standards

  • Collective funding and institutional support

  • Community governance and stewardship

  • Transparent and open evaluation tools

  • Robustness across repertoires and contexts

  • Bias, fairness, and cultural validity

  • Reproducibility and statistical rigor

  • Reporting of limitations and failures

  • Diversity in data, models, and participation

  • Collaboration with musicians and communities

  • Culturally informed design and evaluation

  • Respect for rights, attribution, and consent

  • Fair participation and benefit‑sharing

  • Dialogue across research, industry, policy, and society

  • Policy and governance forums within ISMIR

  • Evidence for standards and regulation

  • Transparency and public communication

  • Support for creative labor and fair distribution of value

  • Interdisciplinary and cross‑cultural education

  • Reciprocal learning with musicians and communities

  • Tutorials, mentoring, and participatory activities

  • Open and accessible educational resources

  • Support for early‑career and underrepresented participants

Figure 1

Conceptual framework connecting music‑AI challenges with principles for assessment, priorities for collective action, and the desired qualities of trustworthy music‑AI.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.372 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Page range: 510 - 525
Submitted on: Feb 12, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 22, 2026
Published on: Sep 25, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Xavier Serra, Vinoo Alluri, Stefan Balke, Juan Pablo Bello, Emmanouil Benetos, Dmitry Bogdanov, Johanna Devaney, Simon Dixon, Zhiyao Duan, George Fazekas, Arthur Flexer, Frederic Font, Magdalena Fuentes, Ichiro Fujinaga, Emilia Gómez, Masataka Goto, Romain Hennequin, Dorien Herremans, Xiao Hu, Dasaem Jeong, Peter Knees, Filip Korzeniowski, Stefan Lattner, Jin Ha Lee, Alexander Lerch, Cynthia Liem, Brian McFee, Emilio Molina, Meinard Müller, Tomoyasu Nakano, Juhan Nam, Oriol Nieto, Sergio Oramas, Bryan Pardo, Geoffroy Peeters, Preeti Rao, Gaël Richard, Martín Rocamora, Ajay Srinivasamurthy, Li Su, Bob L. T. Sturm, George Tzanetakis, Anja Volk, Ye Wang, Gerhard Widmer, Frans Wiering, Christof Weiß, Yi-Hsuan Yang, Eva Zangerle, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.