Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Musicology, Data Science and MIR: Enablers and Barriers to Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Research and Pedagogy Cover

Musicology, Data Science and MIR: Enablers and Barriers to Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Research and Pedagogy

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Bader, R. (2019). Computational music archiving as physical culture theory. In R. Bader (Ed.), Computational Phonogram Archiving, pp. 334. Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330623643_Computational_Music_Archiving_as_Physical_Culture_Theory.
  2. Bainbridge, D., Cowgill, R., Perry, F., Downie, J. S., Dix, A. J., and Twidale, M. B. (2023). Collaborative musicology: Designing a digital library of musical events ephemera. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, pp. 119127. https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/collaborative-musicology-designing-a-digital-library-of-musical-e.
  3. Barthet, M., and Dixon, S. (2011). Ethnographic observations of musicologists at the British Library: Implications for music information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 353358. https://ismir2011.ismir.net/papers/OS5-4.pdf.
  4. Ben‑Tal, O., Sturm, B. L., Quinton, E., Simonnot, J., and Helmlinger, A. (2019). Finding music in music data: A summary of the DaCaRyH project. In R. Bader (Ed.), Computational Phonogram Archiving, pp. 191201. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-02695-0_9.
  5. Born, G. (2010). For a relational musicology: Music and interdisciplinarity, beyond the practice turn. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 135(2), 205243. 10.1080/02690403.2010.506265.
  6. Born, G. (2021). Artistic research and music research: Epistemological status, interdisciplinary forms, and institutional conditions. In A. Huber, D. Ingrisch, T. Kaufmann, J. Kretz, G. Schröder, and T. Zembylas (Eds.), Knowing in Performing: Artistic Research in Music and the Performing Arts, pp. 3550. transcript Verlag. 10.1515/9783839452875-004.
  7. Borsan, V. N., Giraud, M., and Groult, R. (2023). The games we play: Exploring the impact of ISMIR on musicology. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 545552. https://archives.ismir.net/ismir2023/paper/000064.pdf.
  8. Boyd, D., and Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662679. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
  9. Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  10. Brétéché, S., and Esclapez, C. (2018). Music(s), musicology and science: Towards an interscience network. In O. Derrien, P. Hanna, and B. Yvert (Eds.), Music Technology with Swing, pp. 539550. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-01692-0_42.
  11. Calvo‑Zaragoza, J., Rizo Valero, D., and Iñesta Quereda, J. M. (2021). Reconocimiento Óptico de Partituras (OMR) aplicado al Fondo de Música Tradicional IMF‑CSIC. In M. Gembero‑Ustárroz (Ed.), Musicología en Web. Patrimonio musical y Humanidades Digitales, pp. 87109. CSIC.
  12. Cannam, C., Landone, D., Sandler, M., and Bello, J. P. (2006). The Sonic Visualiser: A visualisation platform for semantic descriptors from musical signals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pp. 324327. https://archives.ismir.net/ismir2006/paper/000050.pdf.
  13. Choi, B. C. K., and Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351364. https://domteamscience.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Multidisciplinarity-Interdisciplinarity-and-Transdisciplinarity-in-Health-Research-Services-Education-and-Policy-1.-Definitions-Objectives-and-Evidence-of-Effectiveness.pdf.
  14. Cook, N. (2005). Towards the complete musicologist? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pp. 17. https://ismir2005.ismir.net/documents/Cook-CompleatMusicologist.pdf.
  15. Cottrell, S. (2018). Big music data, musicology, and the study of recorded music: Three case studies. The Musical Quarterly, 101(2–3), 216243. 10.1093/musqtl/gdy013.
  16. Cuthbert, M. X., and Ariza, C. (2010). Music21: A toolkit for computer‑aided musicology and symbolic music data. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 119127. https://archives.ismir.net/ismir2010/paper/000108.pdf.
  17. De Valk, R., Volk, A., Holzapfel, A., Pikrakis, A., Kroher, N., and Six, J. (2017). MIRchiving: Challenges and opportunities of connecting MIR research and digital music archives. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology, pp. 2528. 10.1145/3144749.3144755.
  18. Elangovan, N., and Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8, 101326. 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326.
  19. Fazekas, G., Jacobson, K., Sandler, M., and Raimond, Y. (2010). An overview of Semantic Web activities in the OMRAS2 project. Journal of New Music Research, 39(4), 295311. 10.1080/09298215.2010.536555.
  20. Freedman, R. (Ed.). (2023). CRIM Project Perspectives: Essays and Experiments from Citations – The Renaissance Imitation Mass. Haverford College and The CRIM Project. https://crimproject.org.
  21. Freedman, R. (n.d.a). All About CRIM. Citations: The Renaissance Imitation Mass Project. https://crimproject.org.
  22. Freedman, R. (n.d.b). The Lost Voices Project: Les Livres de Chansons Nouvelles de Nicolas Du Chemin (1549–1568). Centre d’Études Supérieures de la Renaissance. https://digitalduchemin.org.
  23. Futrelle, J., and Downie, J. S. (2003). Interdisciplinary research issues in music information retrieval: ISMIR 2000–2002. Journal of New Music Research, 32(2), 121131. 10.1076/jnmr.32.2.121.16740.
  24. Gómez, E., Herrera, P., and Gómez‑Martin, F. (2013). Computational ethnomusicology: Perspectives and challenges. Journal of New Music Research, 42(2), 111112. 10.1080/09298215.2013.818038.
  25. Hopkins, E., Ju, Y., Polins Pedro, G., McKay, C., Cumming, J., and Fujinaga, I. (2019). SIMSSA DB: Symbolic music discovery and search. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology. https://simssa.ca/assets/files/hopkins_2019_dlfm_simssadb_poster.pdf.
  26. Huang, R. S., Holzapfel, A., Sturm, B. L., and Kaila, A.‑K. (2023). Beyond diverse datasets: Responsible MIR, interdisciplinarity, and the fractured worlds of music. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval, 6(1), 4359. 10.5334/tismir.141.
  27. Huron, D. (2000). Perceptual and cognitive applications in music information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval. https://archives.ismir.net/ismir2000/abstract/000000.pdf.
  28. Ishwar, V., Dutta, S., Bellur, A., and Murthy, H. (2013). Motif spotting in an Alapana in Carnatic music. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 499504. https://ismir2013.ismir.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/205_Paper.pdf.
  29. Leahey, E., Beckman, C. M., and Stanko, T. L. (2016). Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 105139. 10.1177/0001839216665364.
  30. Lenchitz, J. (2021). Reconsidering quantization in MIR. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 374380. https://archives.ismir.net/ismir2021/paper/000046.pdf.
  31. Marsden, A. (2016). Music analysis by computer: Ontology and epistemology. In D. Meredith (Ed.), Computational Music Analysis, pp. 328. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-25931-4_1.
  32. Martin, N. J. (2024). Corpus studies and ‘close listening’. Music Analysis, 43(2), 191246. 10.1111/musa.12229.
  33. McKay, C., Cumming, J., and Fujinaga, I. (2018). jSymbolic 2.2: Extracting features from symbolic music for use in musicological and MIR research. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 348354. https://ismir2018.ircam.fr/doc/pdfs/26_Paper.pdf.
  34. Miller, M., Schäfer, H., Kraus, M., Leman, M., Keim, D., and El‑Assady, M. (2019). Framing visual musicology through methodology transfer. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities at IEEE VIS. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10411.
  35. Morgado Vega, J. J., Sharma, S., and Simonetta, F. (2025). Drafting the landscape of computational musicology tools: A survey‑based approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, pp. 2835. 10.1145/3748336.3748340.
  36. Moss, F. C., and Neuwirth, M. (2021). FAIR, open, linked: Introducing the special issue on open science in musicology. Empirical Musicology Review, 16(1), 14. 10.18061/emr.v16i1.8246.
  37. Neubarth, K., Bergeron, M., and Conklin, D. (2011). Associations between musicology and music information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference. https://www.ehu.eus/cs-ikerbasque/conklin/papers/PS3-13.pdf.
  38. Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human–Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 139178. 10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4.
  39. Parncutt, R., Kessler, A., and Zimmer, F. (Eds.). (2004), Proceedings of the Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM04), Graz, Austria. Department of Musicology, University of Graz, pp. 1518. https://static.uni-graz.at/fileadmin/_Persoenliche_Webseite/parncutt_richard/Pdfs/PaKeZi04_CimAbstracts.pdf.
  40. Peeters, G., Rafii, Z., Fuentes, M., Duan, Z., Benetos, E., Nam, J., and Mitsufuji, Y. (2025). Twenty‑five years of MIR research: Achievements, practices, evaluations, and future challenges. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 15. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10888947.
  41. Plaja‑Roglans, G., Nuttall, T., Serra, X., and Miron, M. (2024). Continuing CompMusic: New approaches in the computational analysis of Carnatic music. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Frontiers of Research in Speech and Music, pp. 8999. Springer Nature Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-97-1549-7_7.
  42. Pugin, L. (2015). The challenge of data in digital musicology. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 2, 16. 10.3389/fdigh.2015.00004.
  43. Rodin, J., and Sapp, C. (n.d.). Josquin Research Project. Stanford University. https://josquin.stanford.edu.
  44. Savage, P. E., Jacoby, N., Margulis, E. H., Daikoku, H., Anglada‑Tort, M., Castelo‑Branco, S. E. S., & Schippers, H. (2023). Building sustainable global collaborative networks: Recommendations from music studies and the social sciences. In E. Margulis, D. Loughridge, and P. Loui (Eds.), The Science‑Music Borderlands: Reckoning with the Past and Imagining the Future, pp. 347365. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/14186.003.0032.
  45. Serra, X. (2011). A multicultural approach in music information research. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 151156. https://ismir2011.ismir.net/papers/OS2-1.pdf.
  46. Srinivasamurthy, A., Gulati, S., Caro Repetto, R., and Serra, X. (2023). Getting started on computational musicology and music information research: An Indian art music perspective. In P. Rao, H. A. Murthy, and S. R. M. Prasann (Eds.), Indian Art Music: A Computational Perspective, pp. 338. https://repositori.upf.edu/items/a19e7626-3543-46d7-b5f5-549e40f20888.
  47. Torrente, Á., and Llorens, A. (2021). The Musicology Lab: Teamwork and the musicological toolbox. Music Encoding Conference Proceedings, pp. 920. https://works.hcommons.org/records/7d2aw-60d54.
  48. Volk, A., de Haas, W. B., and van Kranenburg, P. (2012). Towards modelling variation in music as foundation for similarity. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, pp. 10851094. https://www.lodebar.nl/pvk/wp-content/uploads/avolk_paper_icmpc2012.pdf.
  49. Volk, A., and de Haas, W. B. (2013). A corpus‑based study on ragtime syncopation. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 163168. https://ismir2013.ismir.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/10_Paper.pdf.
  50. Volk, A., Wiering, F., and van Kranenburg, P. (2011). Unfolding the potential of computational musicology. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, pp. 137144. Fryske Akademy. https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/files/475092/avolk_paper_iciso2011.pdf.
  51. Weyde, T., Cottrell, S., Dykes, J., Benetos, E., Wolff, D., Tidhar, D., & Tovell, A. (2014). Big data for musicology. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology, pp. 13. 10.1145/2660168.2660187.
  52. Wiering, F., and Benetos, E. (2013). Digital musicology and MIR: Papers, projects and challenges. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pp. 14. https://ismir2013.ismir.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/lbd4.pdf.
  53. Wiering, F., and Inskip, C. (2015). What do musicologists do all day? Work processes and the adoption of software tools in musicological research. In IAML / IMS Congress. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1472114/1/WDMDAD-IAML-IMS%20(Conflicted%20copy%20+FW).pdf.
  54. Wiering, F., and Inskip, C. (2025). The impact of the pandemic on musicologists’ use of technology. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 19(2). 10.63744/jkpjxyzguaet.
  55. Zhang, G., Sun, J., and Sun, Y. (2023). Mapping interdisciplinary collaboration in music education: Analysis of models in higher education across North America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1284193. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1284193.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.299 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Page range: 234 - 246
Submitted on: Jun 27, 2025
Accepted on: May 4, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Cory McKay, María Elena Cuenca Rodríguez, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.