Table 1
Aspects of security: four concepts.
| TECHNICAL | PERCEIVED | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AGGREGATE | Term | Technical security | Perceived security |
| Definition | Freedom from threats of some group of individuals | Perceived freedom from threats of a group of individuals / fear of threats to the aggregate entity | |
| Empirical representation | |||
| Indicator | Average probability an individual member of a group will be subjected to a particular threat | Perceived average probability an individual member of a group will be subjected to a particular threat/perceived degree to which the aggregate entity is subjected to a particular threat | |
| INDIVIDUAL | Term | Technical safety | Perceived safety |
| Definition | Individual freedom from threats | Perceived individual freedom from threats / fear of threats to the individual | |
| Empirical representation | |||
| Indicator | Probability an individual will be subjected to a particular threat | Perceived probability an individual will be subjected to a particular threat / degree of fear an individual will be subjected to a particular threat |

Figure 1
Perceived security and technical security in the DRC.
Table 2
Correlations between UCDP and ACLED conflict data. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1.
| UCDP data | ACLED data | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Casualties from armed conflict events | Casualties from non-state conflict events | Casualties from one-sided violence events | |
| Armed conflict indicator | |||
| Spearman correlation | 0.5151*** | ||
| Point bi-serial correlation | 0.1215** | ||
| Battle-related deaths | |||
| Spearman correlation | 0.5639*** | ||
| Pearson correlation | 0.1757*** | ||
| Non-state conflict indicator | |||
| Spearman correlation | 0.5195*** | ||
| Point bi-serial correlation | 0.2311*** | ||
| Battle-related deaths from non-state conflict | |||
| Spearman correlation | 0.5492*** | ||
| Pearson correlation | 0.4764*** | ||
| One-sided violence indicator | |||
| Spearman correlation | 0.4501*** | ||
| Point bi-serial correlation | 0.1923*** | ||
| Deaths from one-sided violence | |||
| Spearman correlation | 0.5292*** | ||
| Pearson correlation | 0.7469*** | ||

Figure 2
Perceived safety in South Sudan in May 2013.

Figure 3
Technical security and perceived safety from the LRA in South Sudan.
Table 3
Correlation distance to LRA-related events, fear and experience of LRA. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1.
| Fear of LRA | Indicator directly subjected to LRA | Indicator indirectly subjected to LRA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman | Pearson | Spearman | Point bi-serial | Spearman | Point-biserial | |
| Distance to closest LRA event: | ||||||
| In the last year | −0.0072 | −0.0380 | −0.0214 | 0.0070 | −0.0469 | −0.0534 |
| In the last year, involving civilians | −0.1351*** | −0.1873*** | −0.0100 | −0.0193 | 0.0675 | 0.0662 |
| In the last 2 years | −0.0892* | −0.1141** | −0.0212 | −0.0363 | −0.0432 | −0.0378 |
| In the last 2 years involving civilians | −0.0937* | −0.1096** | −0.0230 | −0.0341 | −0.0023 | −0.0159 |
| In the last 5 years | 0.0478 | −0.0203 | 0.0217 | 0.0235 | −0.0330 | −0.0227 |
| In the last 5 years involving civilians | 0.0128 | −0.0414 | 0.0639 | 0.0400 | −0.0126 | −0.0140 |
| Average distance to 10 closest LRA events: | ||||||
| In the last year | −0.1560*** | −0.1886*** | 0.0266 | −0.0060 | 0.0559 | 0.0356 |
| In the last year, involving civilians | −0.1691*** | −0.2048*** | 0.0227 | −0.0165 | 0.0597 | 0.0667 |
| In the last 2 years | −0.1761*** | −0.2160*** | −0.0083 | −0.0083 | 0.0840* | 0.0692 |
| In the last 2 years involving civilians | −0.2001*** | −0.2228*** | 0.0044 | 0.0051 | 0.1092** | 0.0986* |
| In the last 5 years | −0.0251 | −0.0815* | 0.0498 | 0.0222 | −0.0251 | −0.0001 |
| In the last 5 years involving civilians | −0.0487 | −0.0923* | 0.0498 | 0.0206 | 0.0140 | 0.0043 |
| Fear LRA | 0.0539 | 0.0487 | 0.0087 | −0.0267 | ||
