Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From Readiness to Regulation: Practice-Oriented Measures to Increase the Adoption of Generative AI in the Swiss Public Administration Cover

From Readiness to Regulation: Practice-Oriented Measures to Increase the Adoption of Generative AI in the Swiss Public Administration

By: Moritz Stübi  
Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Agarwal, P. K. (2018). Public administration challenges in the world of AI and bots. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 917921. 10.1111/puar.12979
  2. Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y. C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664. 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
  3. Ajayi, A., Akerele, J., Odio, P. E., Collins, A., et al. (2025). A data-driven approach to strengthening cybersecurity policies in government agencies: Best practices and case studies. International Journal of Engineering Research, 21(3), 3856.
  4. Allen, D., & Weyl, E. G. (2024). The real dangers of generative AI. Journal of Democracy, 35(1), 147162. 10.1353/jod.2024.a915355
  5. Alshahrani, A., Dennehy, D., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). An attention-based view of AI assimilation in public sector organizations: The case of Saudi Arabia. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4). 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101617
  6. Anz, P. (2025, March 24). Bund testet eigene KI “Gov-GPT”. inside-it.ch. https://www.inside-it.ch/post/bund-testet-eigene-ki-gov-gpt-20250324
  7. Aoki, N. (2020). An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector. Government information quarterly, 37(4), 101490. 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490
  8. Arduini, D., Belotti, F., Denni, M., Giungato, G., & Zanfei, A. (2010). Technology adoption and innovation in public services the case of e-government in Italy. Information economics and policy, 22(3), 257275. 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.12.007
  9. Arce-Urriza, M., Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., & Marcos-Matas, G. (2025). From familiarity to acceptance: The impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on consumer adoption of retail chatbots. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84, 104234. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104234
  10. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2020). Administration by algorithm: A risk management framework. Information Polity, 25(4), 471490. 10.3233/IP-200249
  11. Barrett, D., & Heale, R. (2020). What are Delphi studies? Evidence-based nursing, 23(3), 6869. 10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303
  12. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544559.
  13. Beltran, M. A., Ruiz Mondragon, M. I., & Han, S. H. (2024, June). Comparative analysis of generative ai risks in the public sector. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 610617). 10.1145/3657054.3657125
  14. Berryhill, J., Heang, K. K., Clogher, R., & McBride, K. (2019). Hello, World: Artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 36, 1184.
  15. Boston Consulting Group. (2023, November 30). Public sector poised for $1.75 trillion boost in annual productivity by 2033, propelled by GenAI. https://www.bcg.com/press/30november2023-public-sector-boost-in-annual-productivity-genai
  16. Breimaier, H. E., Heckemann, B., Halfens, R. J., & Lohrmann, C. (2015). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): a useful theoretical framework for guiding and evaluating a guideline implementation process in a hospital-based nursing practice. BMC nursing, 14(1), 43. 10.1186/s12912-015-0088-4
  17. Bright, J., Enock, F. E., Esnaashari, S., Francis, J., Hashem, Y., & Morgan, D. (2024). Generative AI is already widespread in the public sector. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01291.
  18. Bundesrat. (2024, January 18). Fact Sheet über den Einsatz von generativen KI-Tools in der Bundesverwaltung (Version 1.2).
  19. Bundesrat. (2025a, March 21). Bundesverwaltung legt Grundsätze für Einsatz von KI in der Verwaltung fest. https://www.news.admin.ch/de/nsb?id=104596
  20. Bundesrat. (2025b, November 26). Bundesrat verabschiedet Bericht zur Digitalen Souveränität der Schweiz. https://www.news.admin.ch/de/newnsb/2VPWG78YrVs4eAVeiklQx
  21. Bundesrat. (2025c, December 12). Leitlinien für die digitale Souveränität in der Bundesverwaltung. https://www.news.admin.ch/de/newnsb/JxuzVHViGShum_f1h_WDu
  22. Cantens, T. (2025). How will the state think with ChatGPT? The challenges of generative artificial intelligence for public administrations. AI & SOCIETY, 40(1), 133144. 10.1007/s00146-023-01840-9
  23. Capgemini, Sogeti, IDC, & Politecnico di Milano. (2024). eGovernment Benchmark 2024 Insight Report. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-strategy/document/download/eGovernment-Benchmark-2024
  24. Chen, T., Gascó-Hernandez, M., & Esteve, M. (2024). The adoption and implementation of artificial intelligence chatbots in public organizations: Evidence from US state governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(3), 255270. 10.1177/02750740231200522
  25. Chun, S. A., & Noveck, B. S. (2025). Introduction to the Special Issue on ChatGPT and other Generative AI Commentaries: AI Augmentation in Government 4.0: AI Augmentation in Government 4.0. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(1), 18. 10.1145/3716859
  26. Ciriello, R. F., Richter, A., & Schwabe, G. (2018). Digital innovation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(6), 563569. 10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8
  27. Coelho, F., Augusto, M., & Lages, L. F. (2011). Contextual factors and the creativity of frontline employees: The mediating effects of role stress and intrinsic motivation. Journal of retailing, 87(1), 3145. 10.1016/j.jretai.2010.11.004
  28. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209(240), 209240.
  29. Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438450. 10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
  30. Damschroeder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation science, 4, 115. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
  31. Damschroeder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Opra Widerquist, M. A., & Lowery, J. (2022). Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Implementation science, 17(1), 7. 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5
  32. Day, J., & Bobeva, M. (2005). A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 3(2), 103116.
  33. De Sousa, W. G., de Melo, E. R. P., Bermejo, P. H. D. S., Farias, R. A. S., & Gomes, A. O. (2019). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). 10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004
  34. Desouza, K. C., Dawson, G. S., & Chenok, D. (2020). Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector. Business Horizons, 63(2), 205213. 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.004
  35. Dhillon, G., Smith, K., & Dissanayaka, I. (2021). Information systems security research agenda: Exploring the gap between research and practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(4), 101693. 10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101693
  36. Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014). Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 67(4), 401409. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
  37. Dzwigol, H. (2022). Research methodology in management science: Triangulation. Virtual Economics, 5(1), 7893. 10.34021/ve.2022.05.01(5)
  38. Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Investigators of Human Creativity, Akten, M., Farid, H., Fjeld, J., … & Smith, A. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380(6650), 11101111. 10.1126/science.adh4451
  39. Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative ai. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111126. 10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
  40. Fleiner, T. (2009). The Curent Situation of Federalism in Switzerland. Revista d’estudis autonòmics i federals, (9), 5190.
  41. Füglister, K., & Wasserfallen, F. (2014). Swiss federalism in a changing environment. Comparative European Politics, 12, 404421. 10.1057/cep.2014.28
  42. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American political science review, 98(2), 341354. 10.1017/S0003055404001182
  43. Guenduez, A. A., et al. (2025, August). Innovation & generative künstliche Intelligenz: Ergebnisse aus der Schweizer Verwaltungspraxis [Report]. Smart Government Lab. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/123251
  44. Guenduez, A. A., & Mettler, T. (2023). Strategically constructed narratives on artificial intelligence: What stories are told in governmental artificial intelligence policies? Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101719. 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101719
  45. Hong, S., Kim, S. H., & Kwon, M. (2022). Determinants of digital innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101723. 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101723
  46. Hopster, J. K., & Maas, M. M. (2024). The technology triad: disruptive AI, regulatory gaps and value change. AI and Ethics, 4(4), 10511069. 10.1007/s43681-023-00305-5
  47. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18(1), 320. 10.1177/1525822X05282260
  48. Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 371377. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011
  49. Jones, R. A., Jimmieson, N. L., & Griffiths, A. (2005). The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of management studies, 42(2), 361386. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00500.x
  50. Kanbach, D. K., Heiduk, L., Blueher, G., Schreiter, M., & Lahmann, A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 18(4), 11891220. 10.1007/s11846-023-00696-z
  51. Keith, R. E., Crosson, J. C., O’Malley, A. S., Cromp, D., & Taylor, E. F. (2017). Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implementation Science, 12, 112. 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7
  52. Knellwolf, T. (2025, March 24). Federal Council experiments with its own AI. Tages-Anzeiger. https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/bundesrat-experimentiert-mit-eigener-ki-123456789
  53. Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976. 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
  54. Lam, H., Quinn, M., Cipriano-Steffens, T., Jayaprakash, M., Koebnick, E., Randal, F., … & Kim, K. (2021). Identifying actionable strategies: using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed interviews to evaluate the implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening. Implementation science communications, 2(1), 57. 10.1186/s43058-021-00150-9
  55. Landis, M. (2025, March 24). Bund testet Gov-GPT in geschützter Umgebung. IT-Markt. Bund testet Gov-GPT in geschützter Umgebung. IT-Markt. Bund testet Gov-GPT in geschützter Umgebung | IT-Markt.
  56. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS quarterly, 5987. 10.2307/25148781
  57. Linder, W., & Vatter, A. (2001). Institutions and outcomes of Swiss federalism: The role of the cantons in Swiss politics. West European Politics, 24(2), 95122. 10.1080/01402380108425435
  58. Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101774. 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774
  59. Maragno, G., Tangi, L., Gastaldi, L., & Benedetti, M. (2023). AI as an organizational agent to nurture: effectively introducing chatbots in public entities. Public Management Review, 25(11), 21352165. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2063935
  60. Margetts, H., Dorobantu, C., & Bright, J. (2024). How to build progressive public services with data science and artificial intelligence. The Political Quarterly, 95(4), 653662. 10.1111/1467-923X.13448
  61. McKinsey & Company. (2023, December 7). Unlocking the potential of generative AI: Three key questions for government agencies. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/unlocking-the-potential-of-generative-ai-three-key-questions-for-government-agencies
  62. Mellouli, S., Janssen, M., & Ojo, A. (2024). Introduction to the issue on artificial intelligence in the public sector: risks and benefits of AI for governments. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(1), 16. 10.1145/3636550
  63. Mergel, I., Dickinson, H., Stenvall, J., & Gasco, M. (2024). Implementing AI in the public sector. Public Management Review, 114. 10.1080/14719037.2023.2231950
  64. Mikhaylov, S. J., Esteve, M., & Campion, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophical transactions of the royal society a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 376(2128), 20170357. 10.1098/rsta.2017.0357
  65. Nanthagopan, Y. (2021). Review and comparison of multi-method and mixed method application in research studies. Journal of Advanced Research, 2(3), 5578.
  66. Neumann, O., Guirguis, K., & Steiner, R. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations: a comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(1), 114141. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685
  67. Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Public administration review, 76(1), 2432. 10.1111/puar.12464
  68. Paré, G., Cameron, A. F., Poba-Nzaou, P., & Templier, M. (2013). A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Information & management, 50(5), 207217. 10.1016/j.im.2013.03.003
  69. Qadir, J. (2023, May). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON) (1–9). IEEE. 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
  70. Reardon, C. M., Damschroder, L. J., Ashcraft, L. E., Kerins, C., Bachrach, R. L., Nevedal, A. L., … & Rogal, S. (2025). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework. Implementation Science, 20(1), 39. 10.1186/s13012-025-01450-7
  71. Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., & Al Halbusi, H. (2024). The good, the bad, and the GPT: Reviewing the impact of generative artificial intelligence on psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 101872. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101872
  72. Schedler, K., & Summermatter, L. (2005). 3. Bericht zum Stand von E-Government in der Schweiz: Teil Kantone. IDT-HSG.
  73. Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763774. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
  74. Scupola, A., & Zanfei, A. (2016). Governance and innovation in public sector services: The case of the digital library. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 237249. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.005
  75. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political research quarterly, 61(2), 294308. 10.1177/1065912907313077
  76. Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024). Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101885. 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885
  77. Simon, H. A. (1995). Artificial intelligence: an empirical science. Artificial intelligence, 77(1), 95127. 10.1016/0004-3702(95)00039-H
  78. Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government information quarterly, 36(2), 368383. 10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
  79. Taeihagh, A. (2025). Governance of generative AI. Policy and society, 44(1), 122. 10.1093/polsoc/puaf001
  80. Von Der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological forecasting and social change, 79(8), 15251536. 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
  81. Wang, C., Teo, T. S., & Janssen, M. (2021). Public and private value creation using artificial intelligence: An empirical study of AI voice robot users in Chinese public sector. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102401. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102401
  82. Wang, J., Kiran, E., Aurora, S. R., Simeone, M., & Lobo, J. (2025). ChatGPT on ChatGPT: An exploratory analysis of its performance in the public sector workplace. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(2), 128. 10.1145/3676281
  83. Wirtz, B. W., Langer, P. F., & Fenner, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the public sector-a research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 11031128. 10.1080/01900692.2021.1947319
  84. Wirtz, B. W., & Müller, W. M. (2019). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management. Public Management Review, 21(7), 10761100. 10.1080/14719037.2018.1549268
  85. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector – applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596615. 10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
  86. Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., … & Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4). 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179
  87. Yigitcanlar, T., David, A., Li, W., Fookes, C., Bibri, S. E., & Ye, X. (2024). Unlocking artificial intelligence adoption in local governments: best practice lessons from real-world implementations. Smart Cities, 7(4), 15761625. 10.3390/smartcities7040064
  88. Zhang, P., & Kamel Boulos, M. N. (2023). Generative AI in medicine and healthcare: promises, opportunities and challenges. Future Internet, 15(9), 286. 10.3390/fi15090286
  89. Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government information quarterly, 38(3). 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.239 | Journal eISSN: 2632-9255
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 12, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Moritz Stübi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 17 (2026): Issue 1