Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Service Models in the Public Sector Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. 1Agarwal, R., Mittal, N., Patterson, E., & Giorcelli, M. (2021). Evolution of the Indian LPG industry: Exploring conditions for public sector business model innovation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104196. 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104196
  2. 2Akingbola, O. A. (2003). Government funding and staffing in the nonprofit sector: a case study of the Canadian Red Cross, Toronto Region. National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, Ottawa.
  3. 3Askim, J., Fimreite, A. L., Moseley, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2011). One-stop shops for social welfare: The adaptation of an organizational form in three countries. Public Administration, 89(4), 14511468. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01933.x
  4. 4Axelson, M., Netz, J., & Sandström, C. (2017). Collective action problems in public sector innovation: A business model perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 370378. 10.1111/caim.12250
  5. 5Ayele, Y. Z., Aliyari, M., Griffiths, D., & Droguett, E. L. (2020). Automatic crack segmentation for UAV-assisted bridge inspection. Energies, 13(23), 6250. 10.3390/en13236250
  6. 6Bahta, Y. T., & Musara, J. P. (2022). Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 Relief Vouchers Schemes on Food Security: Empirical Evidence Insights from South Africa. Land, 11(9), 1431. 10.3390/land11091431
  7. 7Bakos, G. (1997). Seed money approach in Japanese technorogy policy. 彦根論叢(308), 75104.
  8. 8Bellone, C. J., & Goerl, G. F. (1992). Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 130134. 10.2307/976466
  9. 9Bennett, J., & Iossa, E. (2010). Contracting out public service provision to not-for-profit firms. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series, 62(4), 784802. 10.1093/oep/gpp040
  10. 10Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133145. 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008
  11. 11Blomqvist, P., & Winblad, U. (2022). Contracting out welfare services: how are private contractors held accountable? Public Management Review, 24(2), 233254. 10.1080/14719037.2020.1817530
  12. 12Boase, J. P. (2000). Beyond government? The appeal of public-private partnerships. Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada, 43(1), 7592. 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01561.x
  13. 13Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101479 [101471101415]. 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479
  14. 14Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2020). The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971. 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971
  15. 15Box, R. C. (1999). Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 1943. 10.1177/02750749922064256
  16. 16Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: what’s the difference? Journal of management studies, 39(1), 97122. 10.1111/1467-6486.00284
  17. 17Bradshaw, T. K. (2002). The contribution of small business loan guarantees to economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 16(4), 360369. 10.1177/089124202237199
  18. 18Buurma, H. (2001). Public policy marketing: marketing exchange in the public sector. European Journal of Marketing. 10.1108/EUM0000000006483
  19. 19Carpintero, S., & Petersen, O. H. (2016). Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in local services: risk-sharing and private delivery of water services in Spain. Local Government Studies, 42(6), 958979. 10.1080/03003930.2016.1204297
  20. 20Carrera, S. (2014). The price of EU citizenship: The Maltese citizenship-for-sale affair and the principle of sincere cooperation in nationality matters. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 21(3), 406427. 10.1177/1023263X1402100302
  21. 21Chen, Y.-C., & Perry, J. (2003). Outsourcing for e-government: Managing for success. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 404421. 10.1177/1530957603026004007
  22. 22Cho, D.-S. (1992). From subsidizer to regulator—the changing role of Korean government. Long Range Planning, 25(6), 4855. 10.1016/0024-6301(92)90169-3
  23. 23Chow, V. (2020). Predicting auction price of vehicle license plate with deep recurrent neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 142, 113008. 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113008
  24. 24Cinar, E., Simms, C., Trott, P., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2024). Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types. Public Management Review, 26(1), 265292. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2080860
  25. 25Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655669. 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
  26. 26Cutler, D. M. (2002). Health care and the public sector. Handbook of public economics, 4, 21432243. 10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80010-6
  27. 27Damuri, Y. R., & Atje, R. (2012). Investment incentives for renewable energy: case study of Indonesia. Trade Knowledge Network. Available online: https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/investment_incentives_indonesia.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2018).
  28. 28De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146166. 10.1111/padm.12209
  29. 29Demircioglu, M. A. (2024). Public sector innovation: sources, benefits, and leadership. International Public Management Journal, 27(2), 190220. 10.1080/10967494.2023.2276481
  30. 30Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2024). Public Sector Innovation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009279277
  31. 31Dickinson, H. (2016). From new public management to new public governance: The implications for a ‘new public service’. The Three Sector Solution: Delivering public policy in collaboration with not-for-profits and business, 41. 10.22459/TSS.07.2016.03
  32. 32Ehtasham, L. (2022). An Overview of Municipal Solid Waste Collection in Singapore, Mongolia, and Nepal. Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues (IJSEI), 3(2), 122127. 10.47540/ijsei.v3i2.455
  33. 33Feller, J., Finnegan, P., & Nilsson, O. (2011). Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 358374. 10.1057/ejis.2010.65
  34. 34Flick, U. (Ed.) (2013). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. sage. 10.4135/9781446282243
  35. 35Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of management, 43(1), 200227. 10.1177/0149206316675927
  36. 36García, L., Parra, L., Jimenez, J. M., Lloret, J., & Lorenz, P. (2020). IoT-based smart irrigation systems: An overview on the recent trends on sensors and IoT systems for irrigation in precision agriculture. Sensors, 20(4), 1042. 10.3390/s20041042
  37. 37Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Choudury, M. (2020). The business model navigator: the strategies behind the most successful companies. FT Pearson. 10.3139/9783446467620.035
  38. 38Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Csik, M. (2014). The Business Model navigator: 55 Models That Will Revolutionise Your Business. Pearson.
  39. 39Gilson, L., Russell, S., & Buse, K. (1995). The political economy of user fees with targeting: developing equitable health financing policy. Journal of international Development, 7(3), 369401. 10.1002/jid.3380070305
  40. 40Goedkoop, F., & Devine-Wright, P. (2016). Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 135146. 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.021
  41. 41Gomes de Sousa, W., Pereira de Melo, E. R., De Souza Bermejo, P. H., Sousa Farias, R. A., & Oliveira Gomes, A. (2019). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101392 [101391101314], Article 101392. 10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004
  42. 42Guenduez, A. A., & Mettler, T. (2023). Strategically constructed narratives on artificial intelligence: What stories are told in governmental artificial intelligence policies? Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101719. 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101719
  43. 43Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2020). Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data? Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101406 [101401-101412], Article 101406. 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406
  44. 44Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2023). The role of trust in the adoption of cooperative arrangement types in e-credentials markets. Information Polity, 28, 4359. 10.3233/IP-211508
  45. 45Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106, 787804. 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
  46. 46Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2019). The logic of public-private partnerships. The enduring interdependency of politics and markets. Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781784716691
  47. 47Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public administration, 69(1), 319. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  48. 48Hoppe, M., & Thimm, T. (2018). E-mobility in Tourism: Why New Mobility Solutions Have to Overcome Borders. Spaces & Flows: An International Journal of Urban & Extra Urban Studies, 9(4). 10.18848/2154-8676/CGP/v09i04/35-44
  49. 49Ibrahim, I. (2013). Perceptions of a Pre-filled Tax Return System Among Personal Income Taxpayers in Malaysia. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing and Informatics, ICOCI 2013 28–30 August, 2013 Sarawak, Malaysia.
  50. 50Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance: Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(SUPPL. 1), S1S8. 10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
  51. 51Janus, H., & Keijzer, N. (2015). Big results now? Emerging lessons from results-based aid in Tanzania. Emerging Lessons from Results-Based Aid in Tanzania (June 1, 2015). German Development Institute Discussion Paper, 4. 10.2139/ssrn.2673227
  52. 52Jung, D., Kim, B. C., Park, M., & Straub, D. W. (2019). Innovation and Policy Support for Two-Sided Market Platforms: Can Government Policy Makers and Executives Optimize Both Societal Value and Profits? Information Systems Research, 30(3), 10371050. 10.1287/isre.2019.0851
  53. 53Kabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C., & Tam, V. W. (2020). Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121265. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121265
  54. 54Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2011, 28 August—2 September). Open government data: A stage model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2011. Delft, The Netherlands.
  55. 55Kaplan, S. (2011). Business models aren’t just for business. Harvard Business Review.
  56. 56Kim, G.-H., Trimi, S., & Chung, J.-H. (2014). Big-data applications in the government sector. Communications of the ACM, 57(3), 7885. 10.1145/2500873
  57. 57Klasen, A. (2022). Innovative funding schemes in public management. In K. Schedler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public Management. Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781800375499.innovative.financing.schemes
  58. 58Kratzer, J., & Kato, M. P. (2013). Empowering women through microfinance: Evidence from Tanzania.
  59. 59Ladychenko, K., & Tunitska, J. (2019). Features of trade facilitation in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development strategy. By the Academic Council of State University of Jan Kochanowski Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of SSI “Institute for the Education Content Modernization” of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (Minutes No. 6 on 26. 06. 2019), 234.
  60. 60Lee, C. H., Zhao, J. L., & Hassna, G. (2016). Government-incentivized crowdfunding for one-belt, one-road enterprises: design and research issues. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 2. 10.1186/s40854-016-0022-0
  61. 61Lee, J.-A. (2016). Licensing open government data. Hastings Bus. LJ, 13, 207.
  62. 62Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427436. 10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002
  63. 63Liu, H. K. (2017). Crowdsourcing Government: Lessons from Multiple Disciplines. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 656667. 10.1111/puar.12808
  64. 64Lorenz, S., Heigl, B., Palmié, M., & Oghazi, P. (2024). From business models for public actors to public service provision models: Extending the business model concept to the public sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123273. 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123273
  65. 65Luppi, B., Parisi, F., & Rajagopalan, S. (2012). The rise and fall of the polluter-pays principle in developing countries. International Review of Law and Economics, 32(1), 135144. 10.1016/j.irle.2011.10.002
  66. 66Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86+. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000175232600015
  67. 67Martins, H. F., Mota, J. P., & Marini, C. (2019). Business models in the public domain: the public governance canvas. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 17(1), 4967. 10.1590/1679-395167893
  68. 68Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management annals, 11(1), 73104. 10.5465/annals.2014.0072
  69. 69McPherson, M. A., & Liedholm, C. (1996). Determinants of small and micro enterprise registration: Results from surveys in Niger and Swaziland. World Development, 24(3), 481487. 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00147-5
  70. 70Micheli, P., Schoeman, M., Baxter, D., & Goffin, K. (2012). New business models for public-sector innovation: Successful technological innovation for government. Research-Technology Management, 55(5), 5157. 10.5437/08956308X5505067
  71. 71Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489509. 10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2
  72. 72Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 12691280. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
  73. 73Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press.
  74. 74Moran, M. (2002). Understanding the regulatory state. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 391413. 10.1017/S0007123402000169
  75. 75Mules, T. (1998). Taxpayer subsidies for major sporting events. Sport Management Review, 1(1), 2543. 10.1016/S1441-3523(98)70098-1
  76. 76Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 2032. 10.1111/2041-210X.12860
  77. 77Ono, T. (2002). The effects of emission permits on growth and the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21, 7587. 10.1023/A:1014595532338
  78. 78Örnberg, J. C., & Ólafsdóttir, H. (2008). How to sell alcohol? Nordic alcohol monopolies in a changing epoch. Nordic studies on alcohol and Drugs, 25(2), 129153. 10.1177/145507250802500205
  79. 79Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? 1. In: Taylor & Francis. 10.1080/14719030600853022
  80. 80Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135158. 10.1177/0275074012466935
  81. 81Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public management review, 18(5), 639653. 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
  82. 82Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley.
  83. 83Paulin, A. (2013). Towards Self-Service Government-A Study on the Computability of Legal Eligibilities. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(12), 17611791.
  84. 84Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (2003). Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters, 27(4), 336350. 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x
  85. 85Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70, s246s254. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x
  86. 86Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (2005). Elements of strategic planning and management in municipal government: Status after two decades. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 4556. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00429.x
  87. 87Pongsiri, N. (2002). Regulation and public-private partnerships. International Journal of Public sector management, 15(6), 487495. 10.1108/09513550210439634
  88. 88Prager, J. (1994). Contracting out government services: Lessons from the private sector. Public Administration Review, 176184.
  89. 89Ranerup, A., Henriksen, H. Z., & Hedman, J. (2016). An analysis of business models in Public Service Platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 614. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.010
  90. 90Schedler, K. (2023). Business model innovation and the financial dimension of strategy in the public sector. In: C. Greve & T. Ysa (Eds.), Handbook on Strategic Public Management, pp. 211226. 10.4337/9781789907193.00023
  91. 91Schedler, K., & Proeller, I. (2000). New public management. Stuttgart/Wien.
  92. 92Schiuma, G., & Lerro, A. (2017). The business model prism: managing and innovating business models of arts and cultural organisations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(1), 13. 10.1186/s40852-017-0066-z
  93. 93Shaw, D. R., Achuthan, K., Sharma, A., & Grainger, A. (2019). Resilience orchestration and resilience facilitation: How government can orchestrate the whole UK ports market with limited resources – the case of UK ports resilience. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 252263. 10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.003
  94. 94Snihur, Y., & Wiklund, J. (2019). Searching for innovation: Product, process, and business model innovations and search behavior in established firms. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 305325. 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.05.003
  95. 95Srivastava, P. (2010). Public–private partnerships or privatisation? Questioning the state’s role in education in India. Development in Practice, 20(4–5), 540553. 10.1080/09614521003763079
  96. 96Tahir, R., & Wang, A. I. (2019). How to Evaluate Educational Games With Refugee Children: Methodological Aspects and Lessons Learned From EduApp4syria. European Conference on Games Based Learning.
  97. 97Thoring, K., Mueller, R., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2020). Workshops as a Research Method: Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Artifacts Through Workshops. 10.24251/HICSS.2020.620
  98. 98Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2013). What’s in a name? Grasping new public governance as a political-administrative system. International review of public administration, 18(2), 925. 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805250
  99. 99Tummers, L. L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 10991126. 10.1093/jopart/muu056
  100. 100Vining, A. R., & Globerman, S. (1999). Contracting-out health care services: a conceptual framework. Health policy, 46(2), 7796. 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00056-6
  101. 101Vink, M., Schmeets, H., & Mennes, H. (2019). Double standards? Attitudes towards immigrant and emigrant dual citizenship in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(16), 83101. 10.1080/01419870.2019.1567929
  102. 102Wang, H., Liu, Y., Xiong, W., & Zhu, D. (2019). Government support programs and private investments in PPP markets. International Public Management Journal, 22(3), 499523. 10.1080/10967494.2018.1538025
  103. 103Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2015). Evaluation of the excess revenue sharing ratio in PPP projects using principal–agent models. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 13171324. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.002
  104. 104Waters, R. D., & Williams, J. M. (2011). Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. Journal of public affairs, 11(4), 353363. 10.1002/pa.385
  105. 105Wirtz, B. W., Kubin, P. R. M., & Weyerer, J. C. (2021). Business model innovation in the public sector: an integrative framework. Public Management Review, 136. 10.1080/14719037.2021.1972703
  106. 106Woo, C.-K., Horowitz, I., Luk, S., & Lai, A. (2008). Willingness to pay and nuanced cultural cues: Evidence from Hong Kong’s license-plate auction market. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 3553. 10.1016/j.joep.2007.03.002
  107. 107Yadav, A. S., Singh, N., & Kushwaha, D. S. (2022). Sidechain: storage land registry data using blockchain improve performance of search records. Cluster Computing, 25(2), 14751495. 10.1007/s10586-022-03535-0
  108. 108Zahnow, R., Bennett, S., Bates, L., Antrobus, E., & Irvine, C. (2022). An analysis of the effect of social norms on payment of speeding fines. Psychology, Crime & Law, 117. 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2104278
  109. 109Zhang, W., Chiu, Y.-B., & Hsiao, C. Y.-L. (2022). Effects of country risks and government subsidies on renewable energy firms’ performance: Evidence from China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112164. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112164
  110. 110Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 216226. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
  111. 111Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 10191042. 10.1177/0149206311406265
  112. 112Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), [119. 101577. 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.222 | Journal eISSN: 2632-9255
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 18, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2024
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Kuno Schedler, Ali Asker Guenduez, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.