References
- 1Aichholzer, G., & Strauß, S. (2010). Electronic identity management in e-Government 2.0: Exploring a system innovation exemplified by Austria. Information Polity, 15(1–2), 139–152. 10.3233/IP-2010-0203
- 2Aldane, J. (2022, April 4). Eight countries set out principles for the future of digital ID.
https://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/eight-countries-set-out-principles-for-the-future-of-digital-id/ - 3Alharbi, N., Papadaki, M., & Dowland, P. (2017). The impact of security and its antecedents in behaviour intention of using e-government services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(6), 620–636. 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1269198
- 4Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 189–203. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025
- 5Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2010). Implementation of e-Government: Advantages and Challenges. International Association for Scientific Knowledge (IASK).
- 6Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164–175. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004
- 7Argento, D., & Peda, P. (2015). Interactions fostering trust and contract combinations in local public services provision. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 335–351. 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0154
- 8Axelsson, K., & Melin, U. (2012). Citizens’ attitudes towards electronic identification in a public e-service context–an essential perspective in the eid development process. 7443, 260–272. 10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4
- 9Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. Information Polity, 17(3,4), 211–226. 10.3233/IP-2012-000282
- 10Barkane, I. (2022). Questioning the EU proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act: The need for prohibitions and a stricter approach to biometric surveillance1. Information Polity, 27(2), 147–162. 10.3233/IP-211524
- 11Barrett, M., Grant, D., & Wailes, N. (2006). ICT and organizational change: Introduction to the special issue. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. 10.1177/0021886305285299
- 12Beynon-Davies, P. (2006). Personal identity management in the information polity: The case of the UK national identity card. Information Polity, 11(1), 3–19. 10.3233/IP-2006-0085
- 13Beynon-Davies, P. (2021). Data and society. World Scientific. 10.1142/12287
- 14Bostan, A., Şengül, G., & Karakaya, K. M. (2017). Biometric Verification on e-ID-Card Secure Access Devices: A Case Study on Turkish National e-ID Card Secure Access Device Specifications. International Journal of Information Security Science, 6(4), 87–92.
- 15Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438
- 16Buess, M., Ramsden, A., & Bieri, O. (2019). Nationale E-Government-Studie 2019. E Government in der Schweiz aus Sicht der Bevölkerung, der Unternehmen und der Verwaltung. Demo SCOPE AG/Interface Politikstudien Forschung Beratung GmbH.
- 17Bühlmann, J. (2017, May 17). SwissID: einheitliche digitale Identität kommt auf den Markt.
https://www.post.ch/de/ueber-uns/medien/medienmitteilungen/2017/swissid-einheitliche-digitale-identitaet-kommt-auf-den-markt - 18Cahlikova, T. (2015). Introduction of e-Participation in Switzerland: Impact of transparent policy-making and of the empowerment of citizens. Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences, 6(1),
49 . 10.5334/ssas.80 - 19Cahlikova, T. (2021). The Introduction of e-Government in Switzerland: Many Sparks, No Fire. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-78624-3
- 20Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
- 21Carter, L., Weerakkody, V., Phillips, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2016). Citizen Adoption of E-Government Services: Exploring Citizen Perceptions of Online Services in the United States and United Kingdom. Information Systems Management, 33(2), 124–140. 10.1080/10580530.2016.1155948
- 22Chan, F., Thong, J., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., Hu, P., & Tam, K. (2010). Modeling Citizen Satisfaction with Mandatory Adoption of an E-Government Technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 519–549. 10.17705/1jais.00239
- 23Chappelet, J.-L. (2004).
e-Government as an Enabler of Public Management Reform: The Case of Switzerland . In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic Government (Vol. 3183, pp. 283–288). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-540-30078-6_47 - 24Chen, C., Xu, X., & Arpan, L. (2017). Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 25, 93–104. 10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.011
- 25Commonwealth of Australia (Digital Transformation Agency). (2022). Digital Identity in response to COVID-19.
https://www.tech.gov.sg/files/media/corporate-publications/FY2021/dgx_2021_digital_identity_in_response_to_covid-19.pdf - 26Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
- 27Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4),
101409 . 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409 - 28Crompton, M. (2010). User-centric identity management: An oxymoron or the key to getting identity management right? Information Polity, 15(4), 291–297. 10.3233/IP-2010-0193
- 29Dahi, M., & Ezziane, Z. (2015). Measuring e-government adoption in Abu Dhabi with technology acceptance model (TAM). International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(3), 206–231. 10.1504/IJEG.2015.071564
- 30Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- 31Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3),
319 . 10.2307/249008 - 32Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- 33Distel, B. (2020). Assessing citizens’ non-adoption of public e-services in Germany. Information Polity, 25(3), 339–360. 10.3233/IP-190214
- 34Dowling, G. R. (1986). Perceived risk: The concept and its measurement. Psychology & Marketing 3.3 (1986): 193–210. Psychology & Marketing, 3.3, 193–210. 10.1002/mar.4220030307
- 35Dutton, W., Guerra, G. A., Zizzo, D. J., & Peltu, M. (2005). The cyber trust tension in E-government: Balancing identity, privacy, security. Information Polity, 10(1–2), 13–23. 10.3233/IP-2005-0066
- 36Eaton, B., Hedman, J., & Medaglia, R. (2018). Three Different Ways to Skin a Cat: Financialization in the Emergence of National e-ID Solutions. Journal of Information Technology, 33(1), 70–83. 10.1057/s41265-017-0036-8
- 37ELKheshin, S., & Saleeb, N. (2020). Assessing the adoption of e-government using TAM model: Case of Egypt. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 12, 1–14. 10.5121/ijmit.2020.12101
- 38European Commission, Capgemini, Sogeti, IDC, & Politecnico di Milano. (2021). eGovernment benchmark 2021: Entering a new digital government era: background report. Publications Office.
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/798973 - 39Federal Statistical Office. (2022). Stimmbeteiligung. Stimmberechtigte, Stimmbeteiligung, Anzahl Urnengänge seit 1990.
https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/politik/abstimmungen/stimmbeteiligung.html - 40Federal Statistical Office (FSO). (2022). Switzerland’s population in 2021.
https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/en/1155-2100 - 41Fitri, A. (2022, October 24). The state of digital identity in Europe.
https://techmonitor.ai/digital-identity/the-state-of-digital-identity-in-europe - 42Fowler, F. J.,
Jr. , & Cosenza, C. (2009).Design and Evaluation of Survey Questions . In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods (2nd edition). Sage. 10.4135/9781483348858.n12 - 43Gartner. (2023). Gartner Information Technology Glossary. Identity and Access Management (IAM).
https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/identity-and-access-management-iam - 44Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Flores-Zúñiga, M. Á. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success: Integrating implementation and adoption factors. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4),
101518 . 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101518 - 45Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2022). The role of trust in e-credentials markets. Information Polity, 1–17. 10.3233/IP-211508
- 46Güler, M., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). A survey of digital government: Science mapping approach, application areas, and future directions. Systems, 11(12),
563 . 10.3390/systems11120563 - 47Harbach, M., Fahl, S., Rieger, M., & Smith, M. (2013).
On the Acceptance of Privacy-Preserving Authentication Technology: The Curious Case of National Identity Cards . In E. De Cristofaro & M. Wright (Eds.), Privacy Enhancing Technologies (Vol. 7981, pp. 245–264). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-39077-7_13 - 48Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2012). Identifying factors of e-government acceptance–A literature review. Human Behavior in IT Adoption and Use, 1–19.
- 49Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., & Kuo, S.-R. (2013). User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 33–44. 10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.008
- 50Israel, D., & Tiwari, R. (2011). Empirical study of factors influencing acceptance of e-government services in India. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance – ICEGOV ’11, 141. 10.1145/2072069.2072093
- 51Kalvet, T., Tiits, M., & Laas-Mikko, K. (2018). Public Acceptance of Advanced Identity Documents. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 429–432. 10.1145/3209415.3209456
- 52Kanwar, S., Reddy, A., Kedia, M., & Manish, M. (2022). The Emerging Era of Digital Identities: Challenges and Opportunities for the G20 (ADBI Policy Briefs) [ADBI Policy Briefs]. Asian Development Bank Institute. 10.56506/XCNN8924
- 53Kemppainen, L., Kemppainen, T., Kouvonen, A., Shin, Y.-K., Lilja, E., Vehko, T., & Kuusio, H. (2023). Electronic identification (e-ID) as a socio-technical system moderating migrants’ access to essential public services–The case of Finland. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4),
101839 . 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101839 - 54Kofler, R., Krimmer, R., & Prosser, A. (2003). Electronic voting: Algorithmic and implementation issues. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of The, p. 7. 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174319
- 55Kumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). Qualitative approach to determine user experience of e-government services. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 299–306. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.023
- 56Leimgruber, P. (2011). Values and Votes: The Indirect Effect of Personal Values on Voting Behavior: Values and Votes. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(2), 107–127. 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02009.x
- 57Lentner, G. M., & Parycek, P. (2016). Electronic identity (eID) and electronic signature (eSig) for eGovernment services–a comparative legal study. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 10.1108/TG-11-2013-0047
- 58Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. 10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002
- 59Lips, M. (2010). Rethinking citizen – government relationships in the age of digital identity: Insights from research. Information Polity, 15(4), 273–289. 10.3233/IP-2010-0216
- 60Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Does e-government performance actually boost citizen use? Evidence from European countries. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1513–1532. 10.1080/14719037.2017.1412117
- 61Mahadeo, J. D. (2009). Towards an Understanding of the Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Diffusion of e-Government Services. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7(4), 381–392.
- 62Melin, U., Axelsson, K., & Söderström, F. (2016). Managing the development of e-ID in a public e-service context: Challenges and path dependencies from a life-cycle perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 10.1108/TG-11-2013-0046
- 63Mettler, T., & Guenduez, A. A. (2019). From SuisseID to SwissID: Overcoming the key challenges in Switzerland’s e-credential market. Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems, Munich.
- 64Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154,
119973 . 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973 - 65Plattner, R. (2022).
Digitale Identitäten im Behördenverkehr – eine rechtliche Betrachtung . In L. E. Pleger & A. Mertes (Eds.), Digitale Transformation der öffentlichen Verwaltung in der Schweiz (pp. 277–297). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. 10.1007/978-3-658-36591-2_12 - 66Pleger, L. E., Guirguis, K., & Mertes, A. (2021). Making public concerns tangible: An empirical study of German and UK citizens’ perception of data protection and data security. Computers in Human Behavior, 122,
106830 . 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106830 - 67Pleger, L. E., Mertes, A., Rey, A., & Brüesch, C. (2020). Allowing users to pick and choose: A conjoint analysis of end-user preferences of public e-services. Government Information Quarterly,
101473 . 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101473 - 68Rey-Moreno, M., Felício, J. A., Medina-Molina, C., & Rufín, R. (2018). Facilitator and inhibitor factors: Adopting e-government in a dual model. Journal of Business Research, 88, 542–549. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.015
- 69Sang, S., & Lee, J.-D. (2009). A conceptual model of e-government acceptance in public sector. 2009 Third International Conference on Digital Society, 71–76. 10.1109/ICDS.2009.30
- 70Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90–103. 10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
- 71Sialm, G., & Knittl, S. (2016).
Bring Your Own Identity—Case Study from the Swiss Government . In S. Schiffner, J. Serna, D. Ikonomou, & K. Rannenberg (Eds.), Privacy Technologies and Policy (Vol. 9857, pp. 38–47). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-44760-5_3 - 72Singh, S., Kumar, V., Paliwal, M., Verma, P., & Rajak, B. (2022). A citizen-centric approach to understand the effectiveness of e-government web portals: Empirical evidence from India. Information Polity, 27(4), 539–555. 10.3233/IP-220001
- 73Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Xu, K., & Wibowo, K. (2019). Privacy and the Panopticon: Online mass surveillance’s deterrence and chilling effects. New Media & Society, 21(3), 602–619. 10.1177/1461444818801317
- 74Sury, U. (2020). Identitäten in der virtuellen Welt: Zugang, Versenden, Bestellen, Hochladen, Streamen etc. Informatik Spektrum, 42(6), 451–452. 10.1007/s00287-019-01228-4
- 75Swiss Federal Department of Justice and Police EJPD. (2021).
Electronic identity: The E-ID law ,https://www.ejpd.admin.ch/ejpd/de/home/themen/abstimmungen/bgeid.html [last accessed on 10.08.21]. - 76Swiss Parliament. (2022). Gesetzgebung.
https://www.parlament.ch/de/%C3%BCber-das-parlament/parlamentsportraet/aufgaben-der-bundesversammlung/rechtsetzung/gesetzgebung - 77SwissSign AG. (2021, September 14). Strong growth and even more ways to use SwissID.
https://www.swissid.ch/en/news/detail-page~newsID=a49bf797-a3cc-416c-a4e6-5344ddf6d7ab~.html - 78Swissvotes. (2021). Votes.
https://swissvotes.ch/votes - 79Taylor, J. A., & Lips, A. M. B. (2008). The citizen in the information polity: Exposing the limits of the e-government paradigm. Information Polity, 13(3,4), 139–152. 10.3233/IP-2008-0163
- 80Tiits, M., Kalvet, T., & Mikko, K.-L. (2014). Social acceptance of epassports. 6.
- 81Tsap, V., Lips, S., & Draheim, D. (2020a). Analyzing eID public acceptance and user preferences for current authentication options in Estonia. International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 159–173. 10.1007/978-3-030-58957-8_12
- 82Tsap, V., Lips, S., & Draheim, D. (2020b). eID Public Acceptance in Estonia: Towards Understanding the Citizen. The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 340–341. 10.1145/3396956.3397009
- 83Tsap, V., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2019). Factors affecting e-ID public acceptance: A literature review. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (pp. 176–188). Springer Cham. 10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_13
- 84Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
- 85van Dijck, J., & Jacobs, B. (2020). Electronic identity services as sociotechnical and political-economic constructs. New Media & Society, 22(5), 896–914. 10.1177/1461444819872537
- 86Vatter, A. (2014). The political system of Switzerland. Nomos.
- 87Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3),
425 . 10.2307/30036540 - 88Wang, Y.-S. (2003). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 333–352. 10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.005
- 89Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017). Predictors for e-government adoption: Integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk. The Electronic Library, 35(1), 2–20. 10.1108/EL-08-2015-0141
- 90Zhao, F., Naidu, S., & Wallis, J. (2019). An empirical study of e-government adoption in the United Arab Emirates: A social cognitive perspective. Information Polity, 24(1), 91–109. 10.3233/IP-180087
- 91Zwattendorfer, B., & Slamanig, D. (2015). Design strategies for a privacy-friendly Austrian eID system in the public cloud. Computers & Security, 52, 178–193. 10.1016/j.cose.2015.03.002