Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Use and Assessment of E-Voting Systems: Findings from an Online-Survey among Swiss Nationals Living Abroad Cover

Use and Assessment of E-Voting Systems: Findings from an Online-Survey among Swiss Nationals Living Abroad

Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Verwaltungswissenschaften
Volume 9 (2018): Issue 1
By: Lyn E. Pleger and  Alexander Mertes  
Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. 1Abu-Shanab, E. (2014). Antecedents of trust in e-government services: An empirical test in Jordan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 480–499. DOI: 10.1108/TG-08-2013-0027
    Back to article
  2. 2Braun, N., Buchsbaum, T., Krimmer, R., & Prosser, A. (2004). E-Democracy und E-Voting für Auslandsbürger: Arbeitspapiere zum Tätigkeitsfeld Informationsverarbeitung und Informationswirtschaft. (3).
    Back to article
  3. 3Breindl, Y., & Francq, P. (2008). Can Web 2.0 applications save e-democracy? A study of how new internet applications may enhance citizen participation in the political process online. International Journal of Electronic Democracy, 1(1), 14. DOI: 10.1504/IJED.2008.021276
    Back to article
  4. 4Buchstein, H. (2001). Modernisierung der Demokratie durch e-Voting? Leviathan, 29(2), 147–155. DOI: 10.1007/s11578-001-0010-1
    Back to article
  5. 5BV. (1999). Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation.
    Back to article
  6. 6Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
    Back to article
  7. 7Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
    Back to article
  8. 8Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Back to article
  9. 9Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. DOI: 10.2307/249008
    Back to article
  10. 10Federal Chancellery FCh. (2018a). Faktenblatt, Vote électronique. Retrieved from: https://www.bk.admin.ch/dam/bk-intra/de/dokumente_alt/2017/04/e-voting_faktenblatt.pdf.download.pdf/e-voting_faktenblatt.pdf [Last retrieved on 22.02.2018].
    Back to article
  11. 11Federal Chancellery FCh. (2018b). Vote électronique. Retrieved from: https://www.bk.admin.ch/bk/de/home/politische-rechte/e-voting.html [Last retrieved on 21.02.2018].
    Back to article
  12. 12FSO, F. S. O. (2017). Auslandschweizer im Jahr 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/aktuell/neue-veroeffentlichungen.assetdetail.4883813.html.
    Back to article
  13. 13FSO, F. S. O. (2018). Auslandschweizer. Retrieved from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung/stand-entwicklung/auslandschweizer.html [Last retrieved on 21.02.2018].
    Back to article
  14. 14Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838–1852. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003
    Back to article
  15. 15Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., & Yu, T.-J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005
    Back to article
  16. 16Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35(4), 237–250. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
    Back to article
  17. 17Kim, H. J., Pan, G., & Pan, S. L. (2007). Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 338–352. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.09.007
    Back to article
  18. 18Moynihan, D. P. (2004). Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 515–528. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00400.x
    Back to article
  19. 19Ondrisek, B. (2009). Risiken von E-Voting–Sicherheit und Probleme elektronischer Wahlen. Informatik-Spektrum, 32(5), 373–377. DOI: 10.1007/s00287-009-0341-x
    Back to article
  20. 20Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. DOI: 10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
    Back to article
  21. 21Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162. DOI: 10.1080/101967802320245929
    Back to article
  22. 22Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2004). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui021
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.1 | Journal eISSN: 2632-9255
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: May 23, 2018
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2018
Published on: Sep 26, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Digitalization,
E-Voting,
Technology Acceptance Model

© 2018 Lyn E. Pleger, Alexander Mertes, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2018): Issue 1Next article