Table 1
Table 2
Multilevel analyses results for the intensity of interest and confusion.
| RANDOM EFFECTS | VARIANCE | STD.DEV | CORRELATION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | .311 | .56 | |||||
| Emotion | .15 | .39 | –.44 | ||||
| Stimuli | .09 | .32 | |||||
| Condition | .008 | .08 | .63 | ||||
| Emotion | .25 | .50 | .66 | .20 | |||
| FIXED EFFECTS | SUM SQ | MEAN SQ | NUMDF | DENDF | F VALUE | PR(>F) | BF |
| Emotion | 7.05 | 7.05 | 1 | 37 | 4.28 | .05 | 572.41 |
| Complexity | 276.85 | 276.85 | 1 | 10233 | 168.19 | .001 | >1000 |
| Novelty | 83.94 | 83.94 | 1 | 9830 | 50.99 | .001 | >1000 |
| Value | 1966.44 | 1966.44 | 1 | 9736 | 1194.64 | .001 | >1000 |
| Coping Potential | 8.73 | 8.73 | 1 | 9530 | 5.30 | .02 | .137 |
| Condition | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1 | 22 | 0.01 | .91 | . 013 |
| Hunger | 9.90 | 9.90 | 1 | 119 | 6.01 | .02 | .417 |
| Emotion*Complexity | 253.75 | 253.75 | 1 | 9310 | 154.16 | .001 | >1000 |
| Emotion*Novelty | 4.40 | 4.40 | 1 | 9366 | 2.67 | .10 | . 033 |
| Emotion*Value | 292.07 | 292.07 | 1 | 9384 | 177.44 | .001 | >1000 |
| Emotion*Coping Potential | 194.38 | 194.38 | 1 | 7512 | 118.09 | .001 | >1000 |
| Emotion*Condition | 4.51 | 4.51 | 1 | 10375 | 2.74 | .10 | .026 |
[i] Note: Variance (τ) and standard deviation (ρ) are reported for random intercepts for participants and items as well as random slopes by emotion per participants and condition and emotions by items.

Figure 1
Graphical representation of the effect of Complexity, Novelty, Value and Coping potential on the intensity of Interest and Confusion.
