“It’s Like Listening to a Really Nice Sermon”: Emotional Engagement with Science Television Amongst UK Atheist and Nonreligious People and its Implications
References
- Agee, J. 2009. ‘Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4): 431–447. DOI: 10.1080/09518390902736512
- Adam, S, Urman, A, Arlt, D, Gil-Lopez, T, Makhortykh, M and Maier, M. 2023. ‘Media trust and the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of short-term trust changes, their ideological drivers and consequences in Switzerland’. Communication Research, 50(2): 205–229. DOI: 10.1177/00936502221127484
- Beaman, LG. 2021. ‘Reclaiming enchantment: The transformational possibilities of immanence’. Secularism and Nonreligion, 10(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/snr.149
- Berger, PL. 2011. The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York, NY: Open Road Media.
- Berger, PL and Luckmann, T. 1991. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin
- Catto, R and Eccles, J. 2013. ‘(Dis)believing and belonging: Investigating the narratives of young British atheists’. Temenos, 49(1): 37–63. DOI: 10.33356/temenos.8616
- Catto, R, Riley, J, Elsdon-Baker, F, Jones, SH and Leicht, C. 2023. ‘Science, religion, and nonreligion: Engaging subdisciplines to move further beyond mythbusting’. Acta Sociologica, 66(1): 96–110. DOI: 10.1177/00016993221116248
- Catto, R, Shillitoe, R, Jones, S, Kaden, T and Elsdon-Baker, F. 2023b. The social imaginary of science and nonreligion: Narrating the connection in the Anglophone West. Secularism and Nonreligion, 12(3): 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/snr.163
- Collins, H, Leonard-Clarke, W and Mason-Wilkes, W. 2023. Scientific conferences, socialization, and the Covid-19 pandemic: A conceptual and empirical enquiry. Social Studies of Science, 53(3): 379–401. DOI: 10.1177/03063127221138521
- Collins, HM and Evans, R. 2017. Why democracies need science. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Collins, HM, Evans, R, Durant, D and Weinel, M. 2020. Experts and the will of the people: Society, Populism and Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26983-8
- Corbeil, PJ. 2019. ‘Grounding non-theological morality: The Victorian secularist movement, secular ethics, and human progress’. Secularism and Nonreligion, 8(0):
4 . DOI: 10.5334/snr.93 - Cotter, C. 2020. The critical study of non-religion: Discourse, identification and locality. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: 10.5040/9781350095274
- Davies, SR. 2019. ‘Science communication as emotion work: Negotiating curiosity and wonder at a science festival’. Science as Culture, 28(4): 538–561. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2019.1597035
- Dawkins, R. 2006. The god delusion. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
- Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS. (eds.) 2017. The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th edition). London: Sage.
- Durant, J. 2022. ‘Book review: Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench (eds), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology’. Public Understanding of Science, 31(5): 691–692. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221079995
- Elsdon-Baker, F, Leicht, C, Mason-Wilkes, W, Preece, E and Piggot, L. 2017. Science and religion: Exploring the spectrum: Summary report of preliminary findings for a survey of public perspectives on evolution and the relationship between evolutionary science and religion. Birmingham, UK: Newman University and YouGov.
- Elsdon-Baker, F and Lightman, B. 2020.
‘Coda’ . In: Elsdon-Baker, F and Lightman, B (eds.) Identity in a secular age: science, religion, and public perceptions. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 202–208. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1595n98.18 - Fedtke, J, Ibahrine, M, Zaid, B and Shin, DD. 2021. ‘Containing a corona misinfodemic and covidiocy: Political talk shows on German public-service TV’. Journalism Practice, 17(8): 1740–1754. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2021.2004201
- Gubrium, J and Holstein, J. 2003. Postmodern interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985437
- Hall, A. 2022. ‘That fine rain that soaks you through. exploring the role of weather lore, cultural identity, and community memory in shaping attitudes to climate change’. Front. Clim, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2022.808609
- Hall, A and Mason-Wilkes, W (eds.). 2024. Most Adaptable to Change: Evolution and Religion in Global Popular Media. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Hodson, J, Reid, D, Veletsianos, G, Houlden, S and Thompson, C. 2022. ‘Heuristic responses to pandemic uncertainty: practicable communication strategies of “reasoned transparency” to aid public reception of changing science’. Public Understanding of Science, 32(4): 428–441. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221135425
- Hopfe, LM and Woodhead, L. 2008. Religions of the world. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
- Hutchby, I. 2001. ‘Technologies, Texts and Affordances’. Sociology, 35(2): 441–456. DOI: 10.1177/S0038038501000219
- Joffe, H and Yardley, L. 2004.
‘Content and thematic analysis’ . In: Marks, DF and Yardley, L (eds.) Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: SAGE. pp. 56–68. - Johnson, D and Ecklund, E. 2021. Varieties of atheism in science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197539163.001.0001
- Jones, SH, Elsdon-Baker, F, Catto, R and Kaden, T. 2020. ‘What science means to me: Understanding personal identification with (evolutionary) science using the sociology of (non)religion’. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6): 579–596. DOI: 10.1177/0963662520923110
- Leicht, C and Sharp, C. 2020.
‘Beyond belief systems: Promoting a social identity approach to the study of science and religion’ . In: Elsdon-Baker, F and Lightman, B (eds.) Identity in a secular age: science, religion, and public perceptions. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 111–126. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1595n98.12 - Lightman. B. 2007. Victorian popularizers of science: Designing nature for new audiences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226481173.001.0001
- Marsh, O. 2020.
‘Science, emotion and identity online: Constructing science and selves on ‘I fucking love science’ . In: Felt, U and Davies, S (eds.) Exploring science communication: A science and technology studies approach. London: Sage. pp. 171–187. DOI: 10.4135/9781529721256.n9 - Mason-Wilkes, W. 2018. Science as Religion? Science Communication and Elective Modernism. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Cardiff University.
- Mason-Wilkes, W. 2020. ‘Divine DNA? “Secular” and “religious” representations of science in nonfiction science television programs’. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 55(1): 6–26. DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12574
- Mason-Wilkes, W. 2023. ‘Emphasizing uncertainty, celebrating community and valuing values: science communication remedies for the COVID-19 era and beyond’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(2): 379–393. DOI: 10.1080/03080188.2022.2152245
- Mason-Wilkes, W and Hall, A. 2024.
‘From science and humanism to science as religion: The emerging representation of science as a worldview in BBC blue-chip documentaries’ . In: Hall, A and Mason-Wilkes, W (eds.) Most Adaptable to Change: Evolution and Religion in Global Popular Media. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 78–96. DOI: 10.2307/jj.17102084.8 - McLuhan, M. 1967. The medium is the message: An inventory of effects. London: Penguin Books.
- Midgley, M. 2002. Evolution as a religion: Strange hopes and stranger fears. London: Routledge, Chapman & Hall. DOI: 10.4324/9780203472682
- Riley, J. 2022. ‘From ‘first-order’ to ‘second-order’ survey measures of science and religion’. In: International Research Network for the Study of Science & Belief in Society Annual Conference.
University of Birmingham , UK on13-15th July 2002 . - Scheer, M, Fadil, N and Johansen, BS. 2019. Secular bodies, affects and emotions: European configurations. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: 10.5040/9781350065253
- Scheidt, HK. 2021. Practicing atheism: Culture, media, and ritual in the contemporary atheist network. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197536940.001.0001
- Schreier, M. 2018.
‘Sampling and generalization’ . In: Flick, U (ed.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. London: SAGE. pp. 84–97. DOI: 10.4135/9781526416070.n6 - Silva Luna, D and Bering, JM. 2022. ‘Varieties of awe in science communication: Reflexive thematic analysis of practitioners’ experiences and uses of this emotion’. Science Communication, 44(3): 347–374. DOI: 10.1177/10755470221098100
- Stacey, T. 2020. ‘Imaginary friends and made-up stories: How to explore (non)religious imaginaries without asking belief-centred questions’. Secularism and Nonreligion, 9(0): 1–7. DOI: 10.5334/snr.125
- Taves, A, Asprem, E and Ihm, E. 2018. ‘Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion’. Psychology of religion and spirituality, 10(3): 207–217. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000201
- Wilson, TD, Houston, CE, Etling, KM and Brekke, N. 1996. ‘A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(4): 387–402. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.387
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.171 | Journal eISSN: 2053-6712
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 12
Submitted on: Jun 7, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2026
Published on: Jul 22, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2026 Will Mason-Wilkes, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.