Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Increased Wellbeing from Social Interaction in a Secular Congregation Cover

Increased Wellbeing from Social Interaction in a Secular Congregation

Open Access
|Aug 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Intercorrelations and Descriptive Statistics.

12345678MSD
1. All close relationships7.515.09
2. SA close relationships.65**1.211.87
3. SA Sunday attendance.05.191.990.49
4. Other SA activities.20.50**.44**1.550.58
5. Non-SA activities–.06–.15–.03–.111.750.66
6. WE wellbeing.33**.23*.03.18.093.710.44
7. ONS wellbeing.14.10–.06.14.09.82**7.281.15
8. Loneliness–.41**–.32**.07–.22*.03–.69**–.66**2.240.79
9. Composite wellbeing.32**.23*–.03.21*.05.92**.91**–.87**0.070.78

[i] Note. *p < .05, **p < .01. Descriptive statistics are averaged across all six surveys. SA = Sunday Assembly, WE = Warwick-Edinburgh, ONS = Office of National Statistics.

Table 2a–b

Effects of Activities on Sense of Community and Friendship Formation.

ab
Activity%Activity%
1. Socializing before/after service341. Socializing before/after service48
2. Helping organise/run service202. Helping organise/run service15
3. Singing153. Eating together after service10
4. Attending in general; event atmosphere084. Meeting people seated next to you09
5. Listening to speakers085. Attending in general; event atmosphere04
6. Greeting or being greeted056. Greeting or being greeted04
7. Meeting people seated next to you047. Singing03

[i] Note. For Table 2a–b, figures in the % column indicate mean percentage of participants (of those who mentioned at least one activity) per survey who mentioned the activity in response to the question of which SA Sunday service activities most contribute to sense of community (Table 2a) or friendship formation (Table 2b). Participants could name more than one activity per question. Only the seven most frequently mentioned activities are listed in each table.

Table 3

Coefficients, standard error (SE) and p-values of each of the activities predicting wellbeing measures in panel analysis.

Wellbeing measurePredictorCoefficientSEp-value
WESA Sunday attendance–0.0060.03.8
Other SA activities0.0080.004.02
Non-SA activities0.0020.004.6
ONSSA Sunday attendance0.050.07.5
Other SA activities0.030.001<.01
Non-SA activities0.0050.01.6
CompositeSA Sunday attendance0.040.04.3
Other SA activities0.020.005<.01
Non-SA activities0.0030.006.6

[i] Note. WE = Warwick-Edinburgh, ONS = Office of National Statistics, SA = Sunday Assembly.

snr-7-102-g1.png
Figure 1

Standardized coefficients describing effects of Other SA Activities and Non-SA Activities on three wellbeing measures: Warwick-Edinburgh (WE), Office of National Statistics (ONS), and composite (composed of WE, ONS, and Loneliness). Effects are significant for Other SA Activities (all three p values ≤ .02) and non-significant for Non-SA Activities (all three p values ≥ .6). Error bars represent one standard error.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.102 | Journal eISSN: 2053-6712
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 11, 2017
Accepted on: Jul 20, 2018
Published on: Aug 8, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Michael E. Price, Jacques Launay, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.