Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Atheism, Social Networks and Health: A Review and Theoretical Model Cover

Atheism, Social Networks and Health: A Review and Theoretical Model

Secularism and Nonreligion
Volume 8 (2019): Issue 0
By: Kevin McCaffree  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. 1Abbott, S and Freeth, D. 2008. Social capital and health: starting to make sense of the role of generalized trust and reciprocity. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(7): 874–883. DOI: 10.1177/1359105308095060
    Back to article
  2. 2Abu-Raiya, H and Pargament, KI. 2015. Religious coping among diverse religions: Commonalities and divergences. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(1): 24–33. DOI: 10.1037/a0037652
    Back to article
  3. 3Acevedo, G, Ellison, C and Xu, X. 2014. Is it really religion? Comparing the main and stress-buffering effects of religious and secular civic engagement on psychological distress. Society and Mental Health, 4: 111–128. DOI: 10.1177/2156869313520558
    Back to article
  4. 4Ano, G and Vasconcelles, E. 2005. Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4): 461–480. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20049
    Back to article
  5. 5Bainbridge, WS. 2005. Atheism. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1: 1–26.
    Back to article
  6. 6Baker, JO and Smith, BG. 2009. The nones: Social characteristics of the religiously unaffiliated. Social Forces, 87(3): 1251–1263. DOI: 10.1353/sof.0.0181
    Back to article
  7. 7Baker, JO and Smith, BG. 2015. American secularism: Cultural contours of nonreligious belief systems. NY: NYU Press.
    Back to article
  8. 8Baker, JO, Stroope, S and Walker, MH. 2018. Secularity, religiosity, and health: Physical and mental health differences between atheists, agnostics, and nonaffiliated theists compared to religiously affiliated individuals. Social Science Research, 75: 44–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.07.003
    Back to article
  9. 9Barber, N. 2011. A cross-national test of the uncertainty hypothesis of religious belief. Cross-Cultural Research, 45: 318–333. DOI: 10.1177/1069397111402465
    Back to article
  10. 10Barnidge, M. 2018. Social affect and political disagreement on social media. Social Media + Society, 4(3): 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118797721
    Back to article
  11. 11Becker, GS. 1964. Human capital theory. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Back to article
  12. 12Beit-Hallahmi, B. 2015. Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315749846
    Back to article
  13. 13Berger, PL. 1967. The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor Doubleday.
    Back to article
  14. 14Berthold, A and Ruch, W. 2014. Satisfaction with life and character strengths of non-religious and religious people: It’s practicing one’s religion that makes the difference. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(876): 1–9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00876
    Back to article
  15. 15Bhattacharya, K, Ghosh, A, Monsivais, D, Dunbar, RI and Kaski, K. 2016. Sex differences in social focus across the life cycle in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 3(4). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160097
    Back to article
  16. 16Bjornstrom, EE, Ralston, ML and Kuhl, DC. 2013. Social cohesion and self-rated health: the moderating effect of neighborhood physical disorder. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3–4): 302–312. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-013-9595-1
    Back to article
  17. 17Blanchard, TC. 2007. Conservative protestant congregations and racial residential segregation: Evaluating the closed community thesis in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties. American Sociological Review, 72(3): 416–433. DOI: 10.1177/000312240707200305
    Back to article
  18. 18Boehm, C. 2012. Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. New York: Basic Books.
    Back to article
  19. 19Bradley, E. 1995. Religious involvement and social resources: Evidence from the data set ‘Americans’ changing lives’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(2): 259–267. DOI: 10.2307/1386771
    Back to article
  20. 20Bryant-Davis, T and Wong, EC. 2013. Faith to move mountains: Religious coping, spirituality, and interpersonal trauma recovery. American Psychologist, 68: 675–684. DOI: 10.1037/a0034380
    Back to article
  21. 21Burke, PJ and Stets, JE. 2009. Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001
    Back to article
  22. 22Caldwell-Harris, CL. 2012. Understanding atheism/non-belief as an expected individual-differences variable. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2(1): 4–23. DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2012.668395
    Back to article
  23. 23Chen, X, Wang, P, Wegner, R, Gong, J, Fang, X and Kaljee, L. 2015. Measuring social capital investment: Scale development and examination of links to social capital and perceived stress. Social Indicators Research, 120(3): 669–687. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0611-0
    Back to article
  24. 24Cockerham, WC, Hamby, BW and Oates, GR. 2017. The social determinants of chronic disease. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(1): S5–S12 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.010
    Back to article
  25. 25Coleman, JS. 1986. Social structure and the emergence of norms among rational actors. In: Diekman, A and Mitter, P (eds.), Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior, 55–83. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_6
    Back to article
  26. 26Colucci, E and Martin, G. 2008. Religion and spirituality along the suicidal path. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 38(2): 229–244. DOI: 10.1521/suli.2008.38.2.229
    Back to article
  27. 27Cragun, RT, Kosmin, B, Keysar, A, Hammer, JH and Nielsen, M. 2012. On the receiving end: Discrimination toward the non-religious in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1): 105–127. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2012.642741
    Back to article
  28. 28Currier, JM, Smith, PN and Kuhlman, S. 2017. Assessing the unique role of religious coping in suicidal behavior among US Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(1): 118–123. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000055
    Back to article
  29. 29Dubois, E and Blank, G. 2018. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5): 729–745. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
    Back to article
  30. 30Edgell, P, Frost, J and Stewart, E. 2017. From existential to social understandings of risk: Examining gender differences in nonreligion. Social Currents, 4(6): 556–574. DOI: 10.1177/2329496516686619
    Back to article
  31. 31Edgell, P, Gerteis, J and Hartmann, D. 2006. Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71(2): 211–234. DOI: 10.1177/000312240607100203
    Back to article
  32. 32Edgell, P, Hartmann, D, Stewart, E and Gerteis, J. 2016. Atheists and Other Cultural Outsiders: Moral Boundaries and the Non-Religious in the United States. Social Forces, 95(2): 607–638. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sow063
    Back to article
  33. 33Edgell, P and Tranby, E. 2010. Shared visions? Diversity and cultural membership in American life. Social Problems, 57(2): 175–204. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2010.57.2.175
    Back to article
  34. 34Eisenberger, NI and Lieberman, MD. 2004. Why rejection hurts: a common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7): 294–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010
    Back to article
  35. 35Ellison, CG and George, LK. 1994. Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33(1): 46–61. DOI: 10.2307/1386636
    Back to article
  36. 36Emerson, MO and Smith, C. 2000. Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  37. 37Everton, SF. 2015. Networks and religion: Ties that bind, loose, build up, and tear down. Journal of Social Structure, 16(45): 1–34.
    Back to article
  38. 38Fenelon, A and Danielsen, S. 2016. Leaving my religion: Understanding the relationship between religious disaffiliation, health, and well-being. Social Science Research, 57: 49–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.01.007
    Back to article
  39. 39Flaxman, S, Goel, S and Rao, JM. 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1): 298–320. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfw006
    Back to article
  40. 40Fletcher, R and Nielsen, RK. 2018. Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7): 2450–2468. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817724170
    Back to article
  41. 41Forest, AL and Wood, JV. 2012. When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23(3): 295–302. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611429709
    Back to article
  42. 42Froese, P and Bader, C. 2010. America’s four Gods: What we say about god--and what that says about us. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  43. 43Frost, J and Edgell, P. 2018. Rescuing nones from the reference category: civic engagement among the nonreligious in America. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2): 417–438. DOI: 10.1177/0899764017746251
    Back to article
  44. 44Galen, LW. 2009. Profiles of the godless. Free Inquiry, 29: 41–45.
    Back to article
  45. 45Galen, LW. 2012. Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5): 876–906. DOI: 10.1037/a0028251
    Back to article
  46. 46Galen, LW. 2015. Atheism, wellbeing, and the wager: Why not believing in God (with others) is good for you. Science, Religion and Culture, 2(3): 54–69. DOI: 10.17582/journal.src/2015/2.3.54.69
    Back to article
  47. 47Galen, LW. 2018. Focusing on the nonreligious reveals secular mechanisms underlying well-being and prosociality. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3): 296–306. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000202
    Back to article
  48. 48Galen, LW and Kloet, J. 2011. Personality and social integration factors distinguishing nonreligious from religious groups: The importance of controlling for attendance and demographics. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33(2): 205–228. DOI: 10.1163/157361211X570047
    Back to article
  49. 49Galen, LW, Williams, TJ and Ver Wey, AL. 2014. Personality ratings are influenced by religious stereotype and ingroup bias. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24(4): 282–297. DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2013.837658
    Back to article
  50. 50García, A and Blankholm, J. 2016. The social context of organized nonbelief: County-level predictors of nonbeliever organizations in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(1): 70–90. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12250
    Back to article
  51. 51Garneau, C. 2012. Perceived stigma management of Midwest seculars. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
    Back to article
  52. 52Garofalo, R, Kuhns, LM, Hidalgo, M, Gayles, T, Kwon, S, Muldoon, AL and Mustanski, B. 2015. Impact of religiosity on the sexual risk behaviors of young men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 52(5): 590–598. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2014.910290
    Back to article
  53. 53Gebauer, JE, Sedikides, C and Neberich, W. 2012. Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment: On the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23(2): 158–160. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611427045
    Back to article
  54. 54Gebauer, JE, Sedikides, C, Schönbrodt, FD, Bleidorn, W, Rentfrow, PJ, Potter, J and Gosling, SD. 2017. The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3): e18–e39. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000104
    Back to article
  55. 55Gervais, WM. 2014. Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PloS one, 9(4): e92302. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092302
    Back to article
  56. 56Gervais, WM and Najle, MB. 2018. How many atheists are there? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(1): 3–10. DOI: 10.1177/1948550617707015
    Back to article
  57. 57Gervais, WM, Shariff, AF and Norenzayan, A. 2011. Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6): 1189–1206. DOI: 10.1037/a0025882
    Back to article
  58. 58Graham, C and Crown, S. 2014. Religion and well-being around the world: Social purpose, social time, or social insurance? International Journal of Wellbeing, 4(1): 1–27. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v4i1.1
    Back to article
  59. 59Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 73: 1361–1380. DOI: 10.1086/225469
    Back to article
  60. 60Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties—A network theory revisited. In: Collins, R (ed.), Sociological Theory, 201–233. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. DOI: 10.2307/202051
    Back to article
  61. 61Granovetter, M. 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1): 33–50. DOI: 10.1257/0895330053147958
    Back to article
  62. 62Hastings, OP. 2016. Not a lonely crowd? Social connectedness, religious service attendance, and the spiritual but not religious. Social Science Research, 57: 63–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.01.006
    Back to article
  63. 63Henderson, H, Child, S, Moore, S, Moore, JB and Kaczynski, AT. 2016. The Influence of Neighborhood Aesthetics, Safety, and Social Cohesion on Perceived Stress in Disadvantaged Communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(1–2): 80–88. DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12081
    Back to article
  64. 64Hill, TD, Rote, SM, Ellison, CG and Burdette, AM. 2014. Religious attendance and biological functioning: A multiple specification approach. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(5): 766–785. DOI: 10.1177/0898264314529333
    Back to article
  65. 65Hirschi, T. 1969. Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Back to article
  66. 66Holt-Lunstad, J and Smith, TB. 2012. Social relationships and mortality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(1): 41–53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00406.x
    Back to article
  67. 67Holt-Lunstad, J, Smith, TB, Baker, M, Harris, T and Stephenson, D. 2015. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2): 227–237. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614568352
    Back to article
  68. 68Horning, SM, Davis, HP, Stirrat, M and Cornwell, RE. 2011. Atheistic, agnostic, and religious older adults on well-being and coping behaviors. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(2): 177–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2010.08.022
    Back to article
  69. 69Hout, M and Fischer, CS. 2002. Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67(2): 165–190. DOI: 10.2307/3088891
    Back to article
  70. 70Hrdy, SB. 2011. Mothers and others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Back to article
  71. 71Hruschka, D, Efferson, C, Jiang, T, Falletta-Cowden, A, Sigurdsson, S, McNamara, R, Sands, M, Munira, S, Slingerland, E and Henrich, J. 2014. Impartial institutions, pathogen stress, and the expanding social network. Human Nature, 25(4): 567–579. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-014-9217-0
    Back to article
  72. 72Hummer, RA, Rogers, RG, Nam, CB and Ellison, CG, 1999. Religious Involvement and U.S. Adult Mortality. Demography, 36(2): 273–285. DOI: 10.2307/2648114
    Back to article
  73. 73Iannaccone, LR. 1992. Sacrifice and stigma: reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2): 271–291. DOI: 10.1086/261818
    Back to article
  74. 74Iannaccone, LR. 1994. Why strict churches are strong. American journal of sociology, 99(5): 1180–1211. DOI: 10.1086/230409
    Back to article
  75. 75Immerzeel, T and Van Tubergen, F. 2013. Religion as reassurance? Testing the insecurity theory in 26 European countries. European Sociological Review, 29(2): 359–372. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcr072
    Back to article
  76. 76Johnson, KA, Li, YJ, Cohen, AB and Okun, MA. 2013. Friends in high places: The influence of authoritarian and benevolent god-concepts on social attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(1): 15–22. DOI: 10.1037/a0030138
    Back to article
  77. 77King, PE and Furrow, JL. 2004. Religion as a resource for positive youth development: Religion, social capital, and moral out-comes. Developmental Psychology, 40(5): 703–713. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.703
    Back to article
  78. 78Kugelmass, H and Garcia, A. 2015. Mental disorder among nonreligious adolescents. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 18(5): 368–379. DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2015.1063044
    Back to article
  79. 79Langston, J, Hammer, J and Cragun, RT. 2015. Atheism looking in: On the goals and strategies of organized nonbelief. Science, Religion, & Culture, 2(3): 70–85. DOI: 10.17582/journal.src/2015/2.3.70.85
    Back to article
  80. 80Larson, RW, Hansen, DM and Moneta, G. 2006. Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42(5): 849–863. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.849
    Back to article
  81. 81Lawler, EJ, Thye, SR and Yoon, J. 2009. Social commitments in a depersonalized world. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Back to article
  82. 82Lee, S, Chung, JE and Park, N. 2016. Network Environments and Well-Being: An Examination of Personal Network Structure, Social Capital, and Perceived Social Support. Health Communication, 33(1): 22–31. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1242032
    Back to article
  83. 83Lewis, VA, MacGregor, CA and Putnam, RD. 2013. Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42(2), 331–346. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.011
    Back to article
  84. 84Lieberman, MD. 2013. Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  85. 85Li, S, Stampfer, MJ, Williams, DR and VanderWeele, TJ. 2016. Association of religious service attendance with mortality among women. JAMA internal medicine, 176(6), 777–785. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1615
    Back to article
  86. 86Logan, TD and Parman, JM. 2017. The national rise in residential segregation. The Journal of Economic History, 77(1): 127–170. DOI: 10.1017/S0022050717000079
    Back to article
  87. 87Loveland, MT, Capella, AG and Maisonet, I. 2017. Prosocial skeptics: Skepticism and generalized trust. Critical Research on Religion, 5(3): 251–265. DOI: 10.1177/2050303217707245
    Back to article
  88. 88Lund, R, Christensen, U, Nilsson, CJ, Kriegbaum, M and Rod, NH. 2014. Stressful social relations and mortality: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68: 720–727. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203675
    Back to article
  89. 89Marmot, MG. 2006. Status syndrome: a challenge to medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(11): 1304–1307. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1304
    Back to article
  90. 90Marsden, PV and Campbell, KE. 1984. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2): 482–501. DOI: 10.2307/2579058
    Back to article
  91. 91Marsden, PV and Campbell, KE. 2012. Reflections on conceptualizing and measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 91(1): 17–23. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sos112
    Back to article
  92. 92McCaffree, K. 2015. What morality means: An interdisciplinary synthesis for the social sciences. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1057/9781137449290
    Back to article
  93. 93McCaffree, K. 2017. The secular landscape: The decline of religion in America. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50262-5
    Back to article
  94. 94McCaffree, KJ and Saide, AR. 2017. Do secular and religious social networks meet the same individual and societal needs? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 309–312. DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249912
    Back to article
  95. 95McClure, PK. 2016. Faith and Facebook in a Pluralistic Age: The Effects of Social Networking Sites on the Religious Beliefs of Emerging Adults. Sociological Perspectives, 59(4): 818–834. DOI: 10.1177/0731121416647361
    Back to article
  96. 96McCullough, ME, Hoyt, WT, Larson, DB, Koenig, HG and Thoresen, C. 2000. Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review. Health Psychology, 19(3): 211–222. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.211
    Back to article
  97. 97McDougle, L, Konrath, S, Walk, M and Handy, F. 2016. Religious and secular coping strategies and mortality risk among older adults. Social Indicators Research, 125(2): 677–694. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0852-y
    Back to article
  98. 98McPherson, M, Smith-Lovin, L and Cook, JM. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1): 415–444. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
    Back to article
  99. 99Merino, SM. 2014. Social support and the religious dimensions of close ties. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(3): 595–612. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12134
    Back to article
  100. 100Miller, BJ, Mundey, P and Hill, JP. 2013. Faith in the Age of Facebook: Exploring the Links Between Religion and Social Network Site Membership and Use. Sociology of Religion, 74(2): 227–253. DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srs073
    Back to article
  101. 101Moren-Cross, JL and Lin, N. 2006. Social networks and health. In: Binstock, RH and George, LK (ed.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 111–126. New York: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012088388-2/50010-9
    Back to article
  102. 102Mosher, CE, Ott, MA, Hanna, N, Jalal, SI and Champion, VL. 2015. Coping with physical and psychological symptoms: a qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23(7): 2053–2060. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2566-8
    Back to article
  103. 103Musick, MA. 2000. Theodicy and life satisfaction among black and white Americans. Sociology of Religion, 61(3): 267–287. DOI: 10.2307/3712579
    Back to article
  104. 104Nabi, RL, Prestin, A and So, J. 2013. Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10): 721–727. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0521
    Back to article
  105. 105Nelson, G, Hanna, R, Houri, A and Klimes-Dougan, B. 2012. Protective functions of religious traditions for suicide risk. Suicidology Online, 3(1): 59–71.
    Back to article
  106. 106Neumann, ID and Landgraf, R. 2012. Balance of brain oxytocin and vasopressin: implications for anxiety, depression, and social behaviors. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(11): 649–659. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.08.004
    Back to article
  107. 107Nonnemaker, JM, McNeely, CA and Blum, RW. 2003. Public and private domains of religiosity and adolescent health risk behaviors: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Social Science & Medicine, 57(11): 2049–2054. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00096-0
    Back to article
  108. 108Norris, P and Inglehart, R. 2011. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511894862
    Back to article
  109. 109Pargament, KI, Ensing, DS, Falgout, K, Olsen, H, Reilly, B, Van Haitsma, K and Warren, R. 1990. God help me: Religious coping efforts as predictors of the outcomes to significant negative life events. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(6): 793–824. DOI: 10.1007/BF00938065
    Back to article
  110. 110Parigi, P and Henson, W. 2014. Social isolation in America. Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 153–171. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145646
    Back to article
  111. 111Park, CL. 2007. Religiousness/spirituality and health: A meaning systems perspective. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(4): 319–328. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-007-9111-x
    Back to article
  112. 112Paul, G. 2009. The chronic dependence of popular religiosity upon dysfunctional psychological conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3): 398–441. DOI: 10.1177/147470490900700305
    Back to article
  113. 113Peterson, RD and Krivo, LJ. 2010. Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Back to article
  114. 114Pew Research Center. 2014 America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Washington.
    Back to article
  115. 115Phelan, JC, Link, BG and Tehranifar, P. 2010. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities theory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1): 28–40. DOI: 10.1177/0022146510383498
    Back to article
  116. 116Pinker, S. 2010. The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, May 2010, 200914630.
    Back to article
  117. 117Porter, JR. 2010. Diversity, macrosociology, and religious belonging: Using mixed-level models in examining spatial variation and the closed community thesis. Sociological Focus, 43(2): 128–149. DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2010.10571372
    Back to article
  118. 118Porter, JR and Capellan, J. 2014. The ties that bind: Linking religious organizational segregation to the individual level closure of close friendship networks. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41: 32–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.06.003
    Back to article
  119. 119Porter, JR, Capellan, J and Chintakrindi, S. 2015. Social Disorganization Theory. In: Jennings, WG (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment, 1–7. New York: Wiley and Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx169
    Back to article
  120. 120Powell, LH, Shahabi, L and Thoresen, CE. 2003. Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health. American Psychologist, 58: 36–52. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.36
    Back to article
  121. 121Price, ME and Johnson, DD. 2011. The adaptationist theory of cooperation in groups: evolutionary predictions for organizational cooperation. In: Saad, G (ed.), Evolutionary psychology in the business sciences, 95–133. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92784-6_5
    Back to article
  122. 122Price, ME and Launay, J. 2018. Increased Wellbeing from Social Interaction in a Secular Congregation. Secularism and Nonreligion, 7(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.5334/snr.102
    Back to article
  123. 123Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone, the collapse and revival of civic America. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: 10.1145/358916.361990
    Back to article
  124. 124Ramsay, JE, Tong, EM, Chowdhury, A and Ho, MHR. 2018. Teleological explanation and positive emotion serially mediate the effect of religion on well-being. Journal of Personality. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12425
    Back to article
  125. 125Rebellon, CJ and Anskat, P. 2018. Crime, deviance, and social control: Travis Hirschi and his legacy. In: Triplett, RA (ed.), The Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Criminology, 189–206. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119011385.ch11
    Back to article
  126. 126Riley, J, Best, S and Charlton, BG. 2005. Religious believers and strong atheists may both be less depressed than existentially-uncertain people. QJM, 98(11): 840–840. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hci132
    Back to article
  127. 127Ritter, RS, Preston, JL and Hernandez, I. 2014. Happy tweets: Christians are happier, more socially connected, and less analytical than atheists on Twitter. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(2): 243–249. DOI: 10.1177/1948550613492345
    Back to article
  128. 128Ross, CE and Mirowsky, J. 2009. Neighborhood disorder, subjective alienation, and distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1): 49–64. DOI: 10.1177/002214650905000104
    Back to article
  129. 129Sampson, RJ. 2011. Collective efficacy theory: Lessons learned and directions for future inquiry. In Cullen, FT, Wright, J and Blevins, K (eds.), Taking stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, 149–168. New Jersey: Transaction. DOI: 10.4324/9781315130620-6
    Back to article
  130. 130Scheitle, CP and Adamczyk, A. 2009. It takes two: The interplay of individual and group theology on social embeddedness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(1): 16–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01427.x
    Back to article
  131. 131Scheitle, CP, Corcoran, KE and Hudnall, EB. 2018. Adopting a Stigmatized Label: Social Determinants of Identifying as an Atheist beyond Disbelief. Social Forces. DOI: 10.1093/sf/soy084
    Back to article
  132. 132Schnittker, J and McLeod, JD. 2005. The social psychology of health disparities. Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 75–103. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110622
    Back to article
  133. 133Schultz, TW. 1961. Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51: 1–17.
    Back to article
  134. 134Schutz, A. 2017. Organizational Variation in the American Nonreligious Community. In: Cragun, RT, Manning, C and Fazzino, LL (ed.), Organized Secularism in the United States: New Directions in Research, 113–134. Berlin: De Gruyter Press DOI: 10.1515/9783110458657-007
    Back to article
  135. 135Sherkat, DE. 2014. Changing faith: The dynamics and consequences of Americans’ shifting religious identities. New York: NYU Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814741269.001.0001
    Back to article
  136. 136Shor, E and Roelfs, DJ. 2013. The Longevity Effects of Religious and Non -Religious Participation: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1): 120–145. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12006
    Back to article
  137. 137Shor, E and Roelfs, DJ. 2015. Social contact frequency and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Social Science & Medicine, 128: 76–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.010
    Back to article
  138. 138Shor, E, Roelfs, DJ and Yogev, T. 2013. The strength of family ties: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of self-reported social support and mortality. Social Networks, 35(4): 626–638. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.004
    Back to article
  139. 139Sinha, JW, Cnaan, RA and Gelles, RJ. 2007. Adolescent risk behaviors and religion: Findings from a national study. Journal of Adolescence, 30(2): 231–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.02.005
    Back to article
  140. 140Smith, JM. 2010. Becoming an atheist in America: Constructing identity and meaning from the rejection of theism. Sociology of Religion, 72(2): 215–237. DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srq082
    Back to article
  141. 141Smith, JM. 2013. Creating a godless community: The collective identity work of contemporary American atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1): 80–99. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12009
    Back to article
  142. 142Smith, JM. 2017. Can the secular be the object of belief and belonging? The Sunday assembly. Qualitative Sociology, 40(1): 83–109. DOI: 10.1007/s11133-016-9350-7
    Back to article
  143. 143Snedker, KA and Hooven, C. 2013. Neighborhood perceptions and emotional well-being in young adulthood. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 26: 62–73. DOI: 10.1111/jcap.12016
    Back to article
  144. 144Song, L. 2011. Social capital and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(4): 478–492. DOI: 10.1177/0022146511411921
    Back to article
  145. 145Stark, R and Bainbridge, WS. 1985. The future of religion: Secularization, revival, and cult formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Back to article
  146. 146Stavrova, O. 2015. Religion, self-rated health, and mortality: whether religiosity delays death depends on the cultural context. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8): 911–922. DOI: 10.1177/1948550615593149
    Back to article
  147. 147Stavrova, O, Fetchenhauer, D and Schlösser, T. 2013. Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research, 42(1): 90–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.07.002
    Back to article
  148. 148Steinfield, C, Ellison, NB and Lampe, C. 2008. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6): 434–445. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002
    Back to article
  149. 149Stroope, S and Baker, JO. 2014. Structural and cultural sources of community in American congregations. Social Science Research, 45: 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.12.010
    Back to article
  150. 150Sullivan, AR. 2010. Mortality differentials and religion in the United States: religious affiliation and attendance. Journal for the Scientific Study Religion, 49(4): 740–753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01543.x
    Back to article
  151. 151Sunstein, CR. 2002. The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2): 175–195. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9760.00148
    Back to article
  152. 152Sunstein, CR. 2009. Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  153. 153Tavris, C and Aronson, E. 2008. Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    Back to article
  154. 154Taylor, SE, Kemeny, ME, Reed, GM, Bower, JE and Gruenewald, TL. 2000. Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. American Psychologist, 55(1): 99–109. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.99
    Back to article
  155. 155Thoits, PA. 2011. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2): 145–161. DOI: 10.1177/0022146510395592
    Back to article
  156. 156Tooby, J and Cosmides, L. 2015. The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology. In: Buss, DM (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, 3–87. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9780470939376.ch1
    Back to article
  157. 157Tranby, E and Hartmann, D. 2008. Critical whiteness theories and the evangelical “race problem”: Extending Emerson and Smith’s Divided by faith. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(3): 341–359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00414.x
    Back to article
  158. 158Umberson, D and Montez, KJ. 2010. Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1): S54–S66. DOI: 10.1177/0022146510383501
    Back to article
  159. 159Van Cappellen, P, Toth-Gauthier, M, Saroglou, V and Fredrickson, BL. 2016. Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2): 485–505. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-014-9605-5
    Back to article
  160. 160Vergeer, M and Pelzer, B. 2009. Consequences of media and Internet use for offline and online network capital and well-being. A causal model approach. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1): 189–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01499.x
    Back to article
  161. 161Webber, MP and Huxley, PJ. 2007. Measuring access to social capital: The validity and reliability of the Resource Generator-UK and its association with common mental disorder. Social Science & Medicine, 65(3): 481–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.030
    Back to article
  162. 162Weber, SR, Pargament, KI, Kunik, ME, Lomax, JW and Stanley, MA. 2012. Psychological distress among religious nonbelievers: A systematic review. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(1): 72–86. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-011-9541-1
    Back to article
  163. 163Zuckerman, P, Galen, LW and Pasquale, FL. 2016. The nonreligious: Understanding secular people and societies. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924950.001.0001
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.101 | Journal eISSN: 2053-6712
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 18, 2017
Accepted on: Jul 11, 2019
Published on: Oct 16, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Kevin McCaffree, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2019): Issue 0Next article