Chart, Don’t Theme. Why Reflexive Thematic Analysis is a Poor Fit for Scoping Reviews
By: Anél Wiese, Lauren A. Maggio and Deirdre Bennett
References
- Maggio LA, Costello JA, Norton C, Driessen EW, Artino AR. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00626-9
- Mak S, Thomas A. An Introduction to Scoping Reviews. J Grad Med Educ. 2022;14:561–564. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00620.1
- Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:
143 . DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x - Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:
2119 . DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167 - Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2021. DOI: 10.4135/9781036232078.n9
- Coates WC, Jordan J, Clarke SO. A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 2—Coding and thematic analysis. AEM Educ Train. 2021;5:
e10645 . DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10645 - Kiger ME, Varpio L.
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131 . Med Teach. Taylor & Francis. 2020;42:846–854. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030 - Braun V, Clarke V.
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. Routledge. 2021;18:328–352. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 - Braun V, Clarke V.
Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher . Int J Transgender Health. Taylor & Francis. 2023;24:1–6. DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 - Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G.
Thematic Analysis . Handb Res Methods Health Soc Sci [Internet]. Singapore: Springer; 2019 [cited 2026 Mar 1]. p. 843–860. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103 - Maggio LA, Larsen K, Thomas A, Costello JA, Artino AR. Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review. Med Educ. 2021;55:689–700. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14431
- Arksey H, O’Malley L.
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework . Int J Soc Res Methodol. Routledge. 2005;8:19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:
69 . DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 - Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ.
Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria . Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1609406917733847 . SAGE Publications Inc. DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847 - Dhakal K. NVivo. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2022;110:270–272. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1271
- Flemming K, Noyes J.
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where Are We at? Int J Qual Methods. SAGE Publications Inc. 2021;20:1609406921993276 . DOI: 10.1177/1609406921993276 - Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:
45 . DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 - Braun V, Clarke V.
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis . Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11:589–597. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 - Morriss L.
Themes do not emerge. An editor’s reflections on the use of Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis . Qual Soc Work. 2024;23:745–749. SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.1177/14733250241277355 - Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21:
520 . DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123 - Braun V, Clarke V.
Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. Routledge. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa - Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291–1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
- Braun V, Clarke V.
Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis . Qual Psychol. US: Educational Publishing Foundation; 2022;9:3–26. DOI: 10.1037/qup0000196 - Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:45–53. DOI: 10.1177/135581960501000110
- Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:
48 . DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48 - Park JO, Lee-Jayaram J, Sato E, Eto Y, Kahili-Heede M, Hirayama K, et al. A scoping review of remote facilitation during simulation-based healthcare education. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:
592 . DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04551-3 - Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:
117 . DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 - Dixon-Woods M. Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Med. 2011;9:
39 . DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-39 - Meyer EG, Chen HC, Uijtdehaage S, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Scoping Review of Entrustable Professional Activities in Undergraduate Medical Education. Acad Med. 2019;94:
1040 . DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002735 - Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
- Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE.
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis . Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288. SAGE Publications Inc. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687 - Bochatay N, Ju M, O’Brien BC, van Schaik SM. A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Simul Healthc. 2025;20:
33 . DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792 - Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation . Ann Intern Med. American College of Physicians; 2018;169:467–473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850 - Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant. 2022;56:1391–1412. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
- Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5:371–385. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123
- Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini S, Khalil H, Parker D.
Chapter 11: Scoping reviews . Joanna Briggs Inst Rev Man. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2670 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 573 - 582
Submitted on: Apr 9, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2026
Published on: Jul 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2026 Anél Wiese, Lauren A. Maggio, Deirdre Bennett, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.