Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
No Environment, No Education: Honoring the Clinical Learning Environment as the Engine of Competency-Based Education – A Call to Action Cover

No Environment, No Education: Honoring the Clinical Learning Environment as the Engine of Competency-Based Education – A Call to Action

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Torre D, Rice NE, Ryan A, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment-2. Implementation and practice. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):11491160. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1956681
  2. Boursicot K, Kemp S, Wilkinson T, et al. Performance assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the 2020 Ottawa Conference. Med Teach. 2021;43(1):5867. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1830052
  3. Van Melle E, Frank JR, Holmboe ES, et al. A core components framework for evaluating implementation of competency-based medical education programs. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):10021009. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002743
  4. Ryan MS, Lomis KD, Deiorio NM, et al. Competency-based medical education in a norm-referenced world: A root cause analysis of challenges to the competency-based paradigm in medical school. Acad Med. 2023;98(11):12511260. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005220
  5. Hall J, Atkinson A, Chan MK, et al. The clinical learning environment in CanMEDS 2025. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(1). DOI: 10.36834/cmej.75537
  6. Sawatsky AP, Huffman BM, Hafferty FW. Coaching versus competency to facilitate professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2020;95(10):15111514. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003144
  7. Ahn E, LaDonna KA, Landreville JM, et al. Only as strong as the weakest link: Resident perspectives on entrustable professional activities and their impact on learning. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(6):676684. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00204.1
  8. Asch DA, Nicholson S, Srinivas SK, et al. How do you deliver a good obstetrician? Outcome-based evaluation of medical education. Acad Med. 2014;89(1):2426. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000067
  9. Koh NJ, Wagner R, Newton RC, et al. CLER National Report of Findings 2025. Chicago: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2025.
  10. Thoma B, Caretta-Weyer H, Schumacher DJ, et al. Becoming a deliberately developmental organization: Using competency-based assessment data for organizational development. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):801809. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1925100
  11. Nordquist J, Silva S, Caverzagie K, et al. Clinical learning environments: Updates. Med Teach. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2025.2459361
  12. Miller KA, Nagler J, Wolff M, et al. It takes a village: Optimal graduate medical education requires a deliberately developmental organization. Perspect Med Educ. 2023;12(1):282293. DOI: 10.5334/pme.936
  13. Do V, Lewis M, Goldstein C, et al. Fostering a health-promoting learning environment in medical education: Adapting the Okanagan Charter for administrators and medical educators. Acad Med. 2023;98(6):672679. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005159
  14. Rosenthal GE, McClain DA, High KP, et al. The academic learning health system: A framework for integrating the multiple missions of academic medical centers. Acad Med. 2023;98(9):10021007. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005259
  15. Woodruff JN, Vela MB, Lee WW, et al. Enhancing the graduate medical education clinical learning environment through community of practice forums. Acad Med. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005862
  16. Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: A systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):947952. DOI: 10.3109/01421591003686229
  17. Ferguson PC, Caverzagie KJ, Nousiainen MT, et al. Changing the culture of medical training: An important step toward the implementation of competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):599602. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315079
  18. Cartwright-Stroupe LM, Cosme S. Creating an optimal IP learning environment: NCICLE Pathways to Excellence. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022;53(4):150152. DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20220311-02
  19. National Collaborative for Improving the Clinical Learning Environment. NCICLE Pathways to Excellence 2021. Chicago: NCICLE; 2021. DOI: 10.33385/NCICLE.0003
  20. Hallen S, Zelaya MI, White P, et al. Creating optimal clinical learning environments through interprofessional bedside rounding models: Lessons from the iPACE story. Acad Med. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005863
  21. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350383. DOI: 10.2307/2666999
  22. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Role modelling: Making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ. 2008;336(7646):718721. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE
  23. Ulmer F, Krings R, Haberli C, et al. Patient safety 4.0: “Failure of the Week”: It’s all about role modelling. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023;148(15):E87E97. DOI: 10.1055/a-2061-1554
  24. Richardson D, Kinnear B, Hauer KE, et al. Growth mindset in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):751757. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928036
  25. Pot M. Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare. Med Health Care Philos. 2022;25(4):681692. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10112-0
  26. LaDonna KA, Hatala R, Lingard L, et al. Staging a performance: Learners’ perceptions about direct observation during residency. Med Educ. 2017;51(5):498510. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13232
  27. Sivananthajothy P, Adel A, Afhami S, et al. Equity, diversity, and… exclusion? A national mixed methods study of “belonging” in Canadian undergraduate medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-023-10265-4
  28. Dweck CS. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Updated ed. New York: Random House; 2016.
  29. Hopkins SR, Rae VI, Smith SE, et al. From safety net to trampoline: Elevating learning with growth mindset in healthcare simulation. Adv Simul (Lond). 2023;8(1):16. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-023-00264-1
  30. Xiao F, Zhang Z, Zhou J, et al. The relationship between a growth mindset and the learning engagement of nursing students: A structural equation modeling approach. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;73:103796. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103796
  31. Shida Q. Mediating effects of achievement goal orientation on the relationship between growth mindset and learning engagement in medical students: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(21):e38158. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038158
  32. Field L. Guglielmino’s Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale: Should it continue to be used? Adult Educ Q. 1991;41(2):100103. DOI: 10.1177/0001848191041002004
  33. Wolcott MD, McLaughlin JE, Hann A, et al. A review to characterise and map the growth mindset theory in health professions education. Med Educ. 2021;55(4):430440. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14381
  34. Hopkins SR, Rae VI, Smith SE, et al. Trainee growth vs. fixed mindset in clinical learning environments: Enhancing, hindering and goldilocks factors. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1199. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06211-6
  35. Bell ST, Brown SG, Colaneri A, et al. Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork. Am Psychol. 2018;73(4):349362. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000305
  36. Szulewski A, Braund H, Dagnone DJ, et al. The assessment burden in competency-based medical education: How programs are adapting. Acad Med. 2023;98(11):12611267. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005305
  37. Ginsburg S, Stroud L. Necessary but insufficient and possibly counterproductive: The complex problem of teaching evaluations. Acad Med. 2023;98(3):300303. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005006
  38. Wisener K, Driessen E, Tan A, et al. From constructive to critical and everywhere in between: Education leaders’ decision-making related to harsh feedback from learners about their teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025;30(2):497513. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-024-10367-7
  39. Seabrook MA. Medical teachers’ concerns about the clinical teaching context. Med Educ. 2003;37(3):213222. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01437.x
  40. Damodaran AK, Jones P, Shulruf B. Trust and risk pitfalls in medical education: A qualitative study of clinical teachers. Med Teach. 2021;43(11):13091316. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1944613
  41. Terrett AM, Damodaran A, Burnet S, et al. The rheumatology workforce in Australia: Current and projected shortfalls. Intern Med J. 2025;55(9):15001507. DOI: 10.1111/imj.70123
  42. Vygotsky L, Kozulin A. Thought and Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.
  43. Bjork EL, Bjork RA. Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In: Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society. New York: Worth Publishers; 2011. pp. 5664.
  44. Guadagnoli M, Morin MP, Dubrowski A. The application of the challenge point framework in medical education. Med Educ. 2012;46(5):447453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04210.x
  45. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212224. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
  46. Branfield Day L, Miles A, Ginsburg S, et al. Resident perceptions of assessment and feedback in competency-based medical education: A focus group study of one internal medicine residency program. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):17121717. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003315
  47. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638645. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190
  48. Auerbach L, Santen SA, Cutrer WB, et al. The educators’ experience: Learning environments that support the master adaptive learner. Med Teach. 2020;42(11):12701274. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1801998
  49. Snydman LK, Memari M, Puri A, et al. The master adaptive clinician educator: A framework for future educational leaders in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2025;40(4):927932. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09199-3
  50. Daloz LA. Effective Teaching and Mentoring: Realizing the Transformational Power of Adult Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1986.
  51. Lingard L. Paradoxical truths and persistent myths: Reframing the team competence conversation. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36(Suppl 1):S19S21. DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000078
  52. Langlois S. Collective competence: Moving from individual to collaborative expertise. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9(2):7173. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00575-3
  53. Bleakley A. Embracing the collective through medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(5):11771189. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-020-10005-y
  54. Sebok-Syer SS, Chahine S, Watling CJ, et al. Considering the interdependence of clinical performance: Implications for assessment and entrustment. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):970980. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13588
  55. Ginsburg S, McIlroy J, Oulanova O, et al. Toward authentic clinical evaluation: Pitfalls in the pursuit of competency. Acad Med. 2010;85(5):780786. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d73fb6
  56. Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings Psychol Cult. 2011;2(1). DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  57. Morera I, Galván C. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in the educational context. In: Proceedings. 2019. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.04.02.38
  58. Ahn E, Sebok-Syer SS, Maniate JM, et al. Beyond individualism and independence: Exploring collectivism and interdependence as paradigms of healthcare and health professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 2025;14(1):939955. DOI: 10.5334/pme.2000
  59. Crossley N. A dependent structure of interdependence: Structure and agency in relational perspective. Sociology. 2022;56(1):166182. DOI: 10.1177/00380385211020231
  60. Van Lange PAM, Balliet D. Interdependence theory. In: APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal Relations. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2015. pp. 6592. DOI: 10.1037/14344-003
  61. O’Brien BC, Battista A. Situated learning theory in health professions education research: A scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(2):483509. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
  62. Barry ES, Teunissen P, Varpio L, et al. Leadership and followership dynamics in interprofessional health care teams: Attending physician perspectives. Acad Med. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005819
  63. Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. New York: HarperBusiness Essentials; 2006.
  64. Molloy E, Bearman M. Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility: “Intellectual candour” in health professions education. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):3241. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13649
  65. Sebok-Syer SS, Lingard L, Panza M, et al. Supportive and collaborative interdependence: Distinguishing residents’ contributions within health care teams. Med Educ. 2023;57(10):921931. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15064
  66. Schrage M. Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration. New York: Random House; 1990.
  67. Sebok-Syer SS, Shaw JM, Asghar F, et al. A scoping review of approaches for measuring “interdependent” collaborative performances. Med Educ. 2021;55(10):11231130. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14531
  68. Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK. Followership theory: A review and research agenda. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(1):83104. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007
  69. Baldwin J. Extreme ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs lead and win. Engineer. 2017;47(2):55.
  70. Skochelak SE, Hammoud MM, Lomis KD. Health Systems Science. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021.
  71. Miles S, Swift L, Leinster SJ. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM): A review of its adoption and use. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):e620e634. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668625
  72. Chan CYW, Sum MY, Lim WS, et al. Adoption and correlates of Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) in the evaluation of learning environments: A systematic review. Med Teach. 2016;38(12):12481255. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1210108
  73. Bradham TS, Sponsler KC, Watkins SC, Ehrenfeld JM. Creating a quality improvement course for undergraduate medical education: Practice what you teach. Acad Med. 2018;93(10):15271530. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002253
  74. Shaheen AW, Fedoriw KB, Khachaturyan S, et al. Aligning medical student curriculum with practice quality goals: Impacts on quality metrics and practice capacity for students. Am J Med. 2019;132(12):14781483. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.011
  75. Gonzalo JD. Value-Added Roles for Medical Students. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021.
  76. National Academy of Medicine. Learning Health System Shared Commitments Initiative. https://nam.edu/publications-of-the-leadership-consortium (accessed 6 June 2026).
  77. Kegan R, Lahey L, Fleming A, et al. The deliberately developmental organization. https://orghacking.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/thedeliberatelydevelopmentalorganization.pdf (accessed 6 June 2026).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2548 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 771 - 782
Submitted on: Mar 5, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2026
Published on: Sep 9, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Eusang Ahn, Kelly J. Caverzagie, Arvin Damodaran, Soeren Huwendiek, Kimberly Lomis, Adrian P. Marty, David A. Turner, Teri Turner, Adelle Atkinson, As members of the International Competency-Based Health Professions Educators Collaborative, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.