Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“The Doctor Helped Me Decide”: A Linguistic Analysis of Contraceptive Shared Decision-Making Narratives in Clinical Encounters Supported by a Decision Aid Mobile Application Cover

“The Doctor Helped Me Decide”: A Linguistic Analysis of Contraceptive Shared Decision-Making Narratives in Clinical Encounters Supported by a Decision Aid Mobile Application

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Rabi DM, Kunneman M, Montori VM. When guidelines recommend shared decision-making. JAMA. 2020;323(14):13451346. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.1525
  2. Informed consent and shared decision making in obstetrics and gynecology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 819. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):e34e41. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004247
  3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Milestones by Specialty. Accessed January 25, 2026. https://www.acgme.org/milestones/milestones-by-specialty/.
  4. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Understanding the CanMEDS Role: Communicator. Accessed January 25, 2026. https://www.royalcollege.ca/en/standards-and-accreditation/canmeds/communicator-role.html.
  5. Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, Cochran N, Frosch D, Galasiński D, Gulbrandsen P, Han PKJ, Härter M, Kinnersley P, Lloyd A, Mishra M, Perestelo-Perez L, Scholl I, Tomori K, Trevena L, Witteman HO, Van der Weijden T. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017;359:j4891. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4891
  6. Müller E, Strukava A, Scholl I, Härter M, Diouf NT, Légaré F, Buchholz A. Strategies to evaluate healthcare provider trainings in shared decision-making (SDM): a systematic review of evaluation studies. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e026488. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026488
  7. Cooke-Jackson A, Rubinsky V, Gunning JN. “Wish I would have known that before I started using it”: contraceptive messages and information seeking among young women. Health Commun. 2023;38(4):834843. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1980249
  8. Alspaugh A, Barroso J, Reibel M, Phillips S. Women’s contraceptive perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes: an integrative review of qualitative research. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(1):6484. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12992
  9. Konopasky AW, Sheridan K M. Towards a diagnostic toolkit for the language of agency. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2016;23(2):108123. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2015.1128952
  10. Côté CI. A critical and systematic literature review of epistemic justice applied to healthcare: recommendations for a patient partnership approach. Med Health Care Philos. 2024;27(3):455477. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10210-1
  11. Thomas A, Kuper A, Chin-Yee B, Park M. What is “shared” in shared decision-making? Philosophical perspectives, epistemic justice, and implications for health professions education. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(2):409418. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13370
  12. Stavropoulou C. The doctor-patient relationship: a review of the theory and policy implications. In: McGuire A, Costa-Font J, editors. The LSE companion to health policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2012. pp. 31426. DOI: 10.4337/9781781004241.00030
  13. Koopman WJ, LaDonna KA, Anne Kinsella E, Venance SL, Watling CJ. Getting airtime: exploring how patients shape the stories they tell health practitioners. Med Educ. 2021;55(10):11421151. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14561
  14. Martin J, Sugarman J, Thompson J, editors. Psychology and the question of agency. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2003. DOI: 10.1353/book4669
  15. Miller JG, Das R, Chakravarthy S. Culture and the role of choice in agency. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101(1):4661. DOI: 10.1037/a0023330
  16. Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA. Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772
  17. Sun S, Simonsson O, McGarvey S, Torous J, Goldberg SB. Mobile phone interventions to improve health outcomes among patients with chronic diseases: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis from 34 meta-analyses. Lancet Digit Health. 2024;6(11):e857e870. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00119-5
  18. Holland D, Lachicotte W Jr, Skinner D, Cain C, editors. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2001.
  19. Konopasky A, O’Brien BC, Artino AR Jr, Driessen EW, Watling CJ, Maggio LA. I, we and they: a linguistic and narrative exploration of the authorship process. Med Educ. 2022;56(4):456464. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14697
  20. Konopasky A, Varpio L, Stalmeijer RE. The potential of narrative analysis for HPE research: highlighting five analytic lenses. Med Educ. 2021;55(12):13691375. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14597. Erratum in: Med Educ. 2023;57(2):204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14999
  21. Konopasky A, Finn GM, Varpio L. Moving beyond static, individualistic approaches to agency: theories of agency for medical education researchers: AMEE Guide No. 177. Med Teach. 2025;47(8):12521261. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2445045
  22. Kaufman R, Brown R, Martínez Coral C, Jacob J, Onyango M, Thomasen K. Global impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and abortion regression in the United States. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022;30(1):2135574. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2135574
  23. Dehlendorf C, Krajewski C, Borrero S. Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(4):65973. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000059
  24. Meier S, Sundstrom B, Delay C, DeMaria AL. “Nobody’s ever told me that”: women’s experiences with shared decision-making when accessing contraception. Health Commun. 2021;36(2):179187. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1669271
  25. Witkop CT, Maggio LA, Harvey EJ, Torre DM. Complexity in shared decision making: a qualitative analysis of clinical encounters and patient/physician interviews. MedEdPublish. 2022;12:17. DOI: 10.12688/mep.19043.1
  26. Witkop CT, Torre DM, Maggio LA. Decide + Be Ready: a contraceptive decision-making mobile application for servicewomen. Mil Med. 2021;186(11–12):300304. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab194
  27. Dedoose [Computer software]. Version 9.0.18. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants; 2023. Available from: https://www.dedoose.com.
  28. Martin JR, Rose D, editors. Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2003.
  29. Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CM, editors. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2014. DOI: 10.4324/9780203783771
  30. Konopasky AW, Sheridan KM. Towards a diagnostic toolkit for the language of agency. Mind Cult Act. 2016;23(2):10823. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2015.1128952
  31. Enfield NJ. Distribution of agency. In: Enfield NJ, Kockelman P, editors. Distributed agency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 914. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457204.003.0002
  32. Fulcher K, Drabkin M, Gibson J, Francoeur J, Eurchuk A, Weaver M, et al. Contraceptive decision-making and priorities: what happens before patients see a healthcare provider. Can J Hum Sex. 2021;30(1):5664. DOI: 10.3138/cjhs.2020-0052
  33. Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA. Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772
  34. O’Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Entwistle V, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner DR. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007;27(5):55474. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07307319
  35. Sepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, Ropka ME, Stacey D, Joseph-Williams N, Wills CE, Thomson R. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S12. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S12
  36. Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC, Han PK, Boss EF, Ofstad EH, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(9):150510. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014
  37. Staples S. The discourse of nurse-patient interactions: contrasting the communicative styles of U.S. and international nurses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2015. DOI: 10.1075/scl.72
  38. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):13617. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
  39. Loder CM, Minadeo L, Jimenez L, Luna Z, Ross L, Rosenbloom N, Stalburg CM, Harris LH. Bridging the expertise of advocates and academics to identify reproductive justice learning outcomes. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(1):1122. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1631168
  40. Bachorik AE, Shankar M, Williams M, Beaman J, McClintock AH. Teaching reproductive justice. Clin Teach. 2023;20(4):e13593. DOI: 10.1111/tct.13593
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2372 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 24, 2025
|
Accepted on: Feb 3, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 23, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Catherine T. Witkop, Lauren A. Maggio, Abigail Konopasky, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.