Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Judging Oneself and the Feedback: Using a Feedback Literacy Lens to Explore How Learners Experience Professionalism Feedback Cover

Judging Oneself and the Feedback: Using a Feedback Literacy Lens to Explore How Learners Experience Professionalism Feedback

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Participant Characteristics (n = 49) of Medical Students and Residents Interviewed about Professionalism at 3 Medical Schools in 2021–2022.a

DEMOGRAPHICNUMBER (%)
Institution
      Mayo Clinic24 (49%)
      Morehouse7 (14%)
      University of California, San Francisco18 (37%)
Level of Training
      4th year medical student31 (63%)
      Senior resident18 (37%)
Specialty (n = 18 residents)
      Family Medicine3 (17%)
      General Surgery1 (6%)
      Internal Medicine7 (39%)
      Neurosurgery1 (6%)
      Obstetrics and Gynecology2 (11%)
      Pediatrics4 (22%)
Race/Ethnicity
      Asian or Pacific Islander10 (20%)
      Black or African American10 (20%)
      Latinx3 (6%)
      White16 (33%)
      More than one race/ethnicityb9 (18%)
      Prefer not to respond1 (2%)
Representation in medicine
      Underrepresented in medicine (URM)c17 (35%)
      People of color, not URMd15 (31%)
Gender
      Cis Women28 (57%)
      Cis Men21 (43%)
Sexual Orientation
      LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer)8 (16%)
      Straight39 (80%)
      Unsure or prefer not to respond2 (4%)

[i] aReproduced from Maristany D, Hauer KE, Leep Hunderfund AN, et al. The Problem and Power of Professionalism: A Critical Analysis of Medical Students’ and Residents’ Perspectives and Experiences of Professionalism. Acad Med. 2023;98(11S):S32–S41 [4].

bIncludes participants who self-identified as multiple races/ethnicities including Asian, Black, Latinx, Middle Eastern, and White.

cIncludes participants who self-identified as Black/African American, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Filipino, Hmong, or Vietnamese.

dIncludes participants who self-identified as a race/ethnicity other than White which is not included in the definition of URM (c).

pme-15-1-2320-g1.png
Figure 1

Four features of feedback literacy from a resident describing a professionalism feedback scenario.

pme-15-1-2320-g2.png
Figure 2

Proposed model for learner responses to professionalism feedback using Carless and Boud’s framework for feedback literacy23 (see main references list: 23. Carless & Boud).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.2320 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 3, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jan 12, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 4, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Daniela Maristany, Karen E. Hauer, Vincent Grospe, Andrea N. Leep Hunderfund, Martha L. Elks, Bridget C. O’Brien, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.