References
- Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205–214. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
- Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Govaerts MJB, Heeneman S. Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Med Teach. 2015;37(7):641–646. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388
- Ekpenyong A, Padmore JS, Hauer KE. The Purpose, Structure, and Process of Clinical Competency Committees: guidance for members and program directors. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(2s):45–50. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00841.1
- Heeneman S, de Jong LH, Dawson LJ, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment–1. Agreement on the principles. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):1139–1148. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence committee guideline: process and procedures in decision-making. May 7, 2018. Accessed 29 November, 2024.
https://www.royalcollege.ca/content/dam/documents/accreditation/competence-by-design/directory/competence-committees-process-procedures-e.htmlCompetencecommittees - Andolsek K, Padmore J, Hauer K, et al. Clinical competency committees: a guidebook for programs (3rd Edition)
https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/acgmeclinicalcompetencycommitteeguidebook.pdf (accessed 29 November, 2024). - Duitsman ME, Fluit CRMG, van Alfen-van der Velden JAEM, et al. Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(1):1–8. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-018-0490-1
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence by Design: Technical Guide 3: Competence committees.
http://ww.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/assessment/committees/managing-competence-committees-e (accessed 29 November, 2024). - Acai A, Cupido N, Weavers A, et al. Competence committees: the steep climb from concept to implementation. Med Educ. 2021;55(9):1067–1077. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14585
- French JC, Dannefer EF, Colbert CY. A systematic approach toward building a fully operational clinical competency committee. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(6):22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.04.005
- Doty CI, Roppolo LP, Asher S, et al. How do emergency medicine residency programs structure their clinical competency committees? A survey. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(11):1351–1354. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12804
- Promes SB, Wagner MJ. Starting a clinical competency committee. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1):163–164. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00444.1
- Hauer KE, Chesluk B, Iobst W, et al. Reviewing residents’ competence: a qualitative study of the role of clinical competency committees in performance assessment. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1084–1092. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000736
- Kinnear B, Warm EJ, Hauer KE. Twelve tips to maximize the value of a clinical competency committee in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2018;40(11):1110–1115. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1474191
- Monrad SU, Mangrulkar RS, Woolliscroft JO, et al. Competency committees in undergraduate medical education: approaching tensions using a polarity management framework. Acad Med. 2019;94(12):1865–1872. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002816
- Schumacher DJ, Martini A, Sobolewski B, et al. Use of resident-sensitive quality measure data in entrustment decision making: a qualitative study of clinical competency committee members at one pediatric residency. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):1726–1735. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003435
- Schwartz A, Balmer DF, Borman-Shoap E, et al. Shared mental models among clinical competency committees in the context of time-variable, competency-based advancement to residency. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):S95–S102. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003638
- Hauer KE, Ten Cate O, Boscardin CK, et al. Ensuring resident competence: a narrative review of the literature on group decision making to inform the work of clinical competency committees. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2):156–164. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00144.1
- Edgar L, Jones MD, Harsy B, Passiment M, Hauer KE. Better decision-making: shared mental models and the clinical competency committee. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(2s):51–58. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00850.1
- Chahine S, Cristancho S, Padgett J, Lingard L. How do small groups make decisions?: A theoretical framework to inform the implementation and study of clinical competency committees. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(3):192–198. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-017-0357-X
- Colbert CY, French JC, Herring ME, Dannefer EF. Fairness: the hidden challenge for competency-based postgraduate medical education programs. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(5):347–355. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-017-0359-8
- Ekpenyong A, Baker E, Harris I, et al. How do clinical competency committees use different sources of data to assess residents’ performance on the internal medicine milestones? A mixed methods pilot study. Med Teach. 2017;39(10):1074–1083. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1353070
- Schumacher DJ, Michelson C, Poynter S, et al. Thresholds and interpretations: how clinical competency committees identify pediatric residents with performance concerns. Med Teach. 2018;40(1):70–79. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1394576
- Harris P, Snell L, Talbot M, Harden RM. Competency-based medical education: implications for undergraduate programs. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):646–650. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500703
- Hemmer PA, Kelly WF. We need to talk: clinical competency committees in the key of c(onversation). Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(3):141–143. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-017-0360-2
- Kulasegaram K, Mylopoulos M, Tonin P, et al. The alignment imperative in curriculum renewal. Med Teach. 2018;40(5):443–448. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1435858
- Tait GR, Kulasegaram KM. Assessment for learning: the University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine M.D. Program experience. Educ Sci (Basel). 2022;12(4). DOI: 10.3390/educsci12040249
- Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315617444
- Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O’Brien BC, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):40–50. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13124
- Thompson J. A guide to abductive thematic analysis. Qualitative Report. 2022;27(5):1410–1421. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340
- Pack R, Lingard L, Watling CJ, Chahine S, Cristancho SM. Some assembly required: tracing the interpretative work of Clinical Competency Committees. Med Educ. 2019;53(7):723–734. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13884
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Timmermans S, Tavory I.
Abductive Analysis . University of Chicago Press; 2014. - Cannon-Bowers J, Salas E, Converse S.
Shared mental models in expert team decision making . In: Castellan N, editor. Individual and group decision making. L. Erlbaum Associates; 1993. pp. 221–246. - Burns K.
Mental models and normal errors . In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B, editors. How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2005. pp. 15–28. - Dickey CC, Thomas C, Feroze U, Nakshabandi F, Cannon B. Cognitive demands and bias: challenges facing clinical competency committees. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(2):162–164. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00411.1
- Ekpenyong A, Becker K. What resources do clinical competency committees (CCCs) require to do their work? A pilot study comparing CCCs across specialties. Med Teach. 2021;43(1):86–92. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1817878
- Floren LC, Donesky DA, Whitaker E, Irby DM, Ten Cate O, O’Brien BC. Are we on the same page? Shared mental models to support clinical teamwork among health professions learners: A scoping review. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):498–509. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002019