Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Malpractice and Error Cases Influence Information Recall in General Practice Residents, a Vignette Study Cover

How Malpractice and Error Cases Influence Information Recall in General Practice Residents, a Vignette Study

Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. 1Singh H, Meyer AND, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):72731. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627
  2. 2van Sassen CGM, van den Berg PJ, Mamede S, Knol L, Eikens-Jansen MP, van den Broek WW, et al. Identifying and prioritizing educational content from a malpractice claims database for clinical reasoning education in the vocational training of general practitioners. Adv Health Sci Educ [Internet]. 2022 Dec 19 [cited 2022 Dec 19]; Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-022-10194-8.
  3. 3Custers EJ, Regehr G, Norman GR. Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: a review. Acad Med. 1996 Oct;71(10):S5561. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199610000-00044
  4. 4Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HPA. Scripts and Medical Diagnostic Knowledge: Theory and Applications for Clinical Reasoning Instruction and Research. Acad Med [Internet]. 2000;75(2). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2000/02000/Scripts_and_Medical_Diagnostic_Knowledge__Theory.20.aspx.
  5. 5Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning: clinical expertise. Med Educ. 2007 Nov 28;41(12):117884. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02924.x
  6. 6Lubarsky S, Dory V, Audétat MC, Custers E, Charlin B. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J. 2015;6(2):e6170. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.36631
  7. 7Harp SF, Mayer RE. The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. J Educ Psychol. 1997 Mar;89(1):92102. DOI: 10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.92
  8. 8Fischer MA, Mazor KM, Baril J, Alper E, DeMarco D, Pugnaire M. Learning from mistakes: Factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):41923. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00420.x
  9. 9Hidi S. Interest, Reading, and Learning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Educ Psychol Rev. 2001;13(3):191209. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016667621114
  10. 10Hidi S, Renninger KA. The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educ Psychol. 2006 Jun;41(2):11127. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  11. 11Renninger KA, Hidi S. Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest. Educ Psychol. 2011 Jul;46(3):16884. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
  12. 12Tobias S. Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning. Rev Educ Res. 1994 Mar;64(1):3754. DOI: 10.3102/00346543064001037
  13. 13Bean JP, Bradley RK. Untangling the Satisfaction-Performance Relationship for College Students. J High Educ. 1986 Jul;57(4):393412. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1986.11778785
  14. 14Santini FDO, Ladeira WJ, Sampaio CH, Da Silva Costa G. Student satisfaction in higher education: a meta-analytic study. J Mark High Educ. 2017 Jan 2;27(1):118. DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2017.1311980
  15. 15Rey GD. A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educ Res Rev. 2012 Dec;7(3):21637. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003
  16. 16Sundararajan N, Adesope O. Keep it Coherent: A Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Details Effect. Educ Psychol Rev. 2020 Sep;32(3):70734. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09522-4
  17. 17Lehman S, Schraw G, McCrudden MT, Hartley K. Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2007 Oct;32(4):56987. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002
  18. 18Peshkam A, Mensink MC, Putnam AL, Rapp DN. Warning readers to avoid irrelevant information: When being vague might be valuable. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2011 Jul;36(3):21931. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.006
  19. 19Wang ZJ, Adesope O. Does learners’ prior knowledge moderate the detrimental effects of seductive details in reading from text? A 2 by 3 study. Int J Instr. 2016;9(2). DOI: 10.12973/iji.2016.923a
  20. 20Campion N, Martins D, Wilhelm A. Contradictions and Predictions: Two Sources of Uncertainty That Raise the Cognitive Interest of Readers. Discourse Process. 2009 Jul 9;46(4):34168. DOI: 10.1080/01638530802629125
  21. 21Kintsch W. Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics. 1980 Jun;9(1–3):8798. DOI: 10.1016/0304-422X(80)90013-3
  22. 22Mensink MC. Emotional Responses to Seductive Scientific Texts During Online and Offline Reading Tasks. Discourse Process. 2022 Feb 7;59(1–2):7693. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1918492
  23. 23Ruedinger E, Olson M, Yee J, Borman-Shoap E, Olson APJ. Education for the Next Frontier in Patient Safety: A Longitudinal Resident Curriculum on Diagnostic Error. Am J Med Qual. 2017 Nov;32(6):62531. DOI: 10.1177/1062860616681626
  24. 24Kiesewetter I, Könings KD, Kager M, Kiesewetter J. Undergraduate medical students’ behavioural intentions towards medical errors and how to handle them: a qualitative vignette study. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar;8(3):e019500. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019500
  25. 25McConnell MM, Eva KW. The Role of Emotion in the Learning and Transfer of Clinical Skills and Knowledge: Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):131622. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182675af2
  26. 26Pekrun R. Emotions in Reading and Learning from Texts: Progress and Open Problems. Discourse Process. 2022 Feb 7;59(1–2):11625. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1938878
  27. 27Phye GD, Schutz P, Pekrun R. Emotion in Education. [Internet]. Burlington: Elsevier Science; 2011 [cited 2022 Jul 6]. Available from: http://qut.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=291662.
  28. 28Blanchette I, Richards A. The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. In: Houwer and Hermans, editor. Cognition and Emotion: Psychology Press; 2010. DOI: 10.1080/02699930903132496
  29. 29Barroso C, Ganley CM, McGraw AL, Geer EA, Hart SA, Daucourt MC. A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychol Bull. 2021 Feb;147(2):13468. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000307
  30. 30Camacho-Morles J, Slemp GR, Pekrun R, Loderer K, Hou H, Oades LG. Activity Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev. 2021 Sep;33(3):105195. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3
  31. 31Loderer K, Pekrun R, Lester JC. Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments. Learn Instr. 2020 Dec;70:101162. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.08.002
  32. 32Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, Baxter H, Wright B, McLaughlin K. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training: Emotion and cognitive load during simulation. Med Educ. 2012 Nov;46(11):105562. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04355.x
  33. 33Schmidt HG, van Gog T, CE Schuit S, Van den Berge K, Van Daele PLA, Bueving H, et al. Do patients’ disruptive behaviours influence the accuracy of a doctor’s diagnosis? A randomised experiment: Table 1. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):1923. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004109
  34. 34Kremer T, Mamede S, van den Broek WW, Schmidt HG, Nunes M do PT, Martins MA. Influence of negative emotions on residents’ learning of scientific information: an experimental study. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Aug;8(4):20915. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-019-00525-8
  35. 35Tiedens LZ, Linton S. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(6):97388. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
  36. 36Clore GL, Huntsinger JR. How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep;11(9):3939. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005
  37. 37Weary G, Jacobson JA. Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(4):83948. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.839
  38. 38Van Sassen C, Mamede S, Bos M, Van Den Broek W, Bindels P, Zwaan L. Do malpractice claim clinical case vignettes enhance diagnostic accuracy and acceptance in clinical reasoning education during GP training? BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 26;23(1):474. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04448-1
  39. 39Van Sassen C, Mamede S, Hooftman J, Van Den Broek W, Bindels P, Zwaan L. Using clinical cases with diagnostic errors and malpractice claims: impact on anxiety and diagnostic performance in GP clinical reasoning education. Adv Health Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Feb 3 [cited 2025 Feb 4]; Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-025-10412-z.
  40. 40Jaarverslag ErasmusMC 2023 [Internet]. Available from: https://jaarverslag.erasmusmc.nl/jaarverslag-2023/1-bestuursverslag/woord-vooraf.
  41. 41SBOH jaarbeeld 2023 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sboh.nl/media/cqjpepnq/sboh-jaarbeeld-sboh_2023.pdf.
  42. 42Defares PB, van der Ploeg HM, Spielberger CD. Handleiding bij de Zelf-beoordelings Vragenlijst ZBV. Een nederlandstalige bewerking van de Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1980.
  43. 43Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y1-Y2). Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
  44. 44Van der Ploeg HM. De zelf-beoordelings vragenlijst (STAI-DY). Tijdschr Psychiatr, 24, 576–588. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 1982;(24):57688.
  45. 45Spielberger, Charles DS, Sumner J. ‘State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory’. In: The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Maruish ME, editor. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994. 637 p.
  46. 46Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992 Jun;1(3):98101. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
  47. 47Kühl T, Moersdorf F, Römer M, Münzer S. Adding emotionality to seductive details— C onsequences for learning? Appl Cogn Psychol. 2019 Jan;33(1):4861. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3477
  48. 48Sanchez CA, Wiley J. An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):34455. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193412
  49. 49Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies: Cognitive load theory. Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):8593. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x
  50. 50Leppink J, van den Heuvel A. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Jun;4(3):11927. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-015-0192-X
  51. 51Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ. 2007 Nov 14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02915.x
  52. 52Mamede S, Schmidt HG. Reflection in Medical Diagnosis: A Literature Review. Health Prof Educ. 2017 Jun 1;3(1):1525. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpe.2017.01.003
  53. 53Royce CS, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM. Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety. Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518
  54. 54Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Cognitive metaphors of expertise and knowledge: prospects and limitations for medical education. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):115965. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02912.x
  55. 55Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Putting the expert together again. Med Educ. 2011;45(9):9206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04032.x
  56. 56Pusic MV, Santen SA, Dekhtyar M, Poncelet AN, Roberts NK, Wilson-Delfosse AL, et al. Learning to balance efficiency and innovation for optimal adaptive expertise. Med Teach. 2018 Aug 3;40(8):8207. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1485887
  57. 57Kensinger EA, Corkin S. Effect of Negative Emotional Content on Working Memory and Long-Term Memory. Emotion. 2003;3(4):37893. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.378
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1730 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 12, 2025
Published on: Apr 29, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Charlotte van Sassen, Walter van den Broek, Patrick Bindels, Laura Zwaan, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.