References
- Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478–85. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
- Bok H, Teunissen T, Favier Rea. Programmatic Assessment of Competency Based Workplace Learning: where theory meets practice. Med Educ. 2013;13:123. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-123
- van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LK, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205–14. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
- van der Vleuten CP, Heeneman S. On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5(5):303–7. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-016-0295-Z
- Jackson D, Davison I, Adams R, Edordu A, Picton A. A systematic review of supervisory relationships in general practitioner training. Med Educ. 2019;53(9):874–85. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13897
- O’Dowd E, Lydon S, O’Connor P, Madden C, Byrne D. A systematic review of 7 years of research on entrustable professional activities in graduate medical education, 2011–2018. Med Educ. 2019;53(3):234–49. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13792
- Schultz K, Griffiths J, Lacasse M. The Application of Entrustable Professional Activities to Inform Competency Decisions in a Family Medicine Residency Program. Acad Med. 2015;90(7):888–97. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000671
- Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, Van Der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308
- De Jonge LPJWM, Timmerman AA, Govaerts MJB, Muris JWM, Muijtjens AMM, Kramer AWM, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on workplace-based performance assessment: towards a better understanding of assessor behaviour. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(5):1213–43. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-017-9760-7
- Torre D, Schuwirth L, Van der Vleuten C, Heeneman S. An international study on the implementation of programmatic assessment: Understanding challenges and exploring solutions. Med Teach. 2022;44(8):928–37. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2083487
- Barrett A, Galvin R, Steinert Y, Scherpbier A, O’Shaughnessy A, Horgan M, et al. A BEME (Best Evidence in Medical Education) review of the use of workplace-based assessment in identifying and remediating underperformance among postgraduate medical trainees: BEME Guide No. 43. Med Teach. 2016;38(12):1188–98. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215413
- Jackson D, Davison I. Tensions in postgraduate training: Meaningful engagement or ‘tick-box’ supervision? Med Educ. 2020;54(11):970–2. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14300
- Toale C, Nally DM, Ryan DM, Morris M, Kavanagh DO. How do Trainers and Trainees use Formative Workplace-based Assessments of Operative Competence to Deliver and Receive Structured Feedback? J Surg Educ. 2022;79(2):485–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.023
- Prentice S, Benson J, Kirkpatrick E, Schuwirth L. Workplace-based assessments in postgraduate medical education: A hermeneutic review. Med Educ. 2020;54(11):981–92. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14221
- Govaerts M. Workplace-Based Assessment and Assessment for Learning: Threats to Validity. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(2):265–7. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00101.1
- Prins SH, Brondt SG, Malling B. Implementation of workplace-based assessment in general practice. Educ Prim Care. 2019;30(3):133–44. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2019.1588788
- Barrett A, Hanley K. Myths and legends in workplace-based assessment; it’s all about perspective? Educ Prim Care. 2020;31(2):74–80. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1712664
- Jamieson J, Hay M, Gibson S, Palermo C. Implementing programmatic assessment transforms supervisor attitudes: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Med Teach. 2021;43(6):709–17. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1893678
- McEllistrem B, Barrett A, Hanley K. Performance in practice; exploring trainer and trainee experiences of user-designed formative assessment tools. Educ Prim Care. 2021;32(1):27–33. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1815085
- Taylor DR, Park YS, Egan R, Chan MK, Karpinski J, Touchie C, et al. EQual, a Novel Rubric to Evaluate Entrustable Professional Activities for Quality and Structure. Acad Med. 2017;92(11S)S110–S7. Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001908
- Windak A, Rochfort A, Jacquet J. The revised European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine. A pivotal role of One Health, Planetary Health and Sustainable Development Goals. Eur J Gen Pract. 2024;30(1):2306936. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2306936
- Family Medicine Milestones US. The Accrediation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2019.
- WPBA capabilities with IPUs RCGP: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2021 Available from:
https://www.rcgp.org.uk/mrcgp-exams/wpba/capability-framework . - EPAs in Medical Education: Competency based training with MyProgress: MyKnowledgeMap; 2024 Available from:
https://www.myknowledgemap.com/news-events/posts/epas-in-medical-education-competency-based-training-with-myprogress/ . - Biggs JB. Aligning teaching for constructive learning: The Higher Education Academy; 2003 Available from:
https://www.biol.uzh.ch/education/pdf/ConstructiveAlignment_Biggs.pdf . - McEllistrem B, Hennus M, Fawns T, Hanley K. Dashboard Implementation Exploring the Irish General Practice training community’s perceptions on how an Entrustable Professional Activities could facilitate the delivery of General Practice training in Ireland. Educ Prim Care. 2022;34(3):1–9. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2023.2191340
- Rothwell C, Kehoe A, Farook SF, Illing J. Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):
e052929 . DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929 - Schut S, Maggio LA, Heeneman S, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Driessen E. Where the rubber meets the road – An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(1):6–13. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00625-W
- Govaerts M, Van Der Vleuten CP. Validity in work-based assessment: expanding our horizons. Med Educ. 2013;47(12):1164–74. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12289
- Driessen E, Scheele F. What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):569–74. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.798403
- Ben David MF, Davis MH, Harden RM, Howie PW, Ker J, Pippard MJ. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23(6):535–51. DOI: 10.1080/01421590120090952
- Duitsman ME, Fluit CRMG, Van Alfen-Van Der Velden JAEM, De Visser M, Ten Kate-Booij M, Dolmans DHJM, et al. Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(1):1–8. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-018-0490-1
- Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, et al. Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206–14. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559
- Colbert CY, French JC, Herring ME, Dannefer EF. Fairness: the hidden challenge for competency-based postgraduate medical education programs. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(5):347–55. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-017-0359-8
- Promes SB, Wagner MJ. Starting a Clinical Competency Committee. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1):163–4. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00444.1
- Noble C, Billett S, Armit L, Collier L, Hilder J, Sly C, et al. “It’s yours to take”: generating learner feedback literacy in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2020;25(1):55–74. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09905-5
- Carless D. Double duty, shared responsibilities and feedback literacy. Perspect Med Educ; 2020. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-020-00599-9
- Xu Y, Carless D. ‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy. Assess Eval High Educ. 2017;42(7):1082–94. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759
- Richardson D, Kinnear B, Hauer KE, Turner TL, Warm EJ, Hall AK, et al. Growth mindset in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2021:1–7. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928036
- Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R, Brydges R. What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19(2):233–50. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-013-9458-4
- Ten Cate O, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):1106–14. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838465
- McEllistrem B, Hennus MP, Fawns T, Hanley K. Exploring the Irish general practice training community’s perceptions on how an entrustable professional activities dashboard implementation could facilitate general practice training in Ireland. Educ Prim Care. 2023:1–9. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2023.2191340
- Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten CP.
How to design a useful test : The Principles of Assessment . In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding Medical Education. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: Wiley Blackwell; 2019. - Heeneman S, De Jong LH, Dawson LJ, Wilkinson TJ, Ryan A, Tait GR, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment – 1. Agreement on the principles. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):1139–48. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088
- Hoffman BD. Using self-determination theory to improve residency training: learning to make omelets without breaking eggs. Acad Med. 2015;90(4):408–10. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000523
- Crockett C, Joshi C, Rosenbaum M, Suneja M. Learning to drive: resident physicians’ perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):293. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1732-6
- Schumacher DJ, Cate OT, Damodaran A, Richardson D, Hamstra SJ, Ross S, et al. Clarifying essential terminology in entrustment. Med Teach. 2021:1–8.
- St-Onge C, Young M, Eva KW, Hodges B. Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017;22(4):853–67. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3
- Ginsburg S, Watling CJ, Schumacher DJ, Gingerich A, Hatala R. Numbers Encapsulate, Words Elaborate: Toward the Best Use of Comments for Assessment and Feedback on Entrustment Ratings. Acad Med. 2021;96(7S):S81–S6. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004089