References
- 1Peternelj-Taylor C. Licking your wounds: Responding to the peer review process. J Forensic Nursing. 2011; 7: 157–158. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01120.x
- 2Watling C, Shaw J, Field E, Ginsburg S. ‘For the most part it works’: Exploring how authors navigate peer review feedback. Med Educ. 2023; 57(2): 151–160. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14932
- 3Watling C, LaDonna K. Where philosophy meets culture: exploring how coaches conceptualize their roles. Med Educ. 2019; 53(5): 467–476. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13799
- 4Taylor BW. Writing an effective response to a manuscript review. Freshwater Science. 2016; 35(4): 1082–1087. DOI: 10.1086/688886
- 5Watling C, Ginsburg S, LaDonna K, Lingard L, Field E. Going against the grain: An exploration of agency in medical learning. Med Educ. 2021; 55(8): 942–950. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14532
- 6LaPlaca P, Lindgreen A, Vanhamme J, DiBenedetto CA. How to revise, and revise really well, for premier academic journals. Industrial Marketing Management. 2018; 72: 174–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.030
- 7Lingard L. From semi-conscious to strategic paragraphing. Perspect Med Educ. 2019; 8: 98–100. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-019-0507-4