Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What does “Timely” Mean to Residents? Challenging Feedback Assumptions in Postgraduate Education Cover

What does “Timely” Mean to Residents? Challenging Feedback Assumptions in Postgraduate Education

Perspectives on Medical Education
Volume 12 (2023): Issue 1
By: Alyssa Lip,  Christopher J. Watling and  Shiphra Ginsburg  
Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. 1Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015; 4(6): 284–99. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-015-0231-7
    Back to article
  2. 2Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010; 44(1): 101–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x
    Back to article
  3. 3Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Feedback in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(Suppl 2): 460. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02280-5
    Back to article
  4. 4Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983; 250(6): 777–81. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026
    Back to article
  5. 5Johnson CE, Weerasuria MP, Keating JL. Effect of face-to-face verbal feedback compared with no or alternative feedback on the objective workplace task performance of health professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3): e030672. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030672
    Back to article
  6. 6Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012; 17(1): 15–26. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7
    Back to article
  7. 7Van De Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, Ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008; 42(2): 189–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
    Back to article
  8. 8Elnicki DM, Layne RD, Ogden PE, Morris DK. Oral versus written feedback in medical clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13(3): 155–8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00049.x
    Back to article
  9. 9Marcotte L, Egan R, Soleas E, Dalgarno N, Norris M, Smith C. Assessing the quality of feedback to general internal medicine residents in a competency-based environment. Canadian medical education journal. 2019; 10(4): e32–e47. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.57323
    Back to article
  10. 10Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L, Eva KW. Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments. Med Educ. 2015; 49(3): 296–306. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12637
    Back to article
  11. 11Tekian A, Watling CJ, Roberts TE, Steinert Y, Norcini J. Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education. Med Teach. 2017; 1–5. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1372564
    Back to article
  12. 12Tayebi V, Armat MR, Ghouchani HT, Khorashadizadeh F, Gharib A. Oral versus written feedback delivery to nursing students in clinical education: A randomized controlled trial. Electron Physician. 2017; 9(8): 5008–14. DOI: 10.19082/5008
    Back to article
  13. 13Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, Carnahan H. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med. 2009; 84(10): S54–S7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf
    Back to article
  14. 14Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of educational research. 2007; 77(1): 81–112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487
    Back to article
  15. 15Schum TR, Krippendorf RL, Biernat KA. Simple Feedback Notes Enhance Specificity of Feedback to Learners. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2003; 3(1): 9–11. DOI: 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<;0009:SFNESO>2.0.CO;2
    Back to article
  16. 16Ginsburg S, Watling CJ, Schumacher DJ, Gingerich A, Hatala R. Numbers Encapsulate, Words Elaborate: Toward the Best Use of Comments for Assessment and Feedback on Entrustment Ratings. Acad Med. 2021; 96(7S): S81–S6. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004089
    Back to article
  17. 17Bing-You R, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, McKelvy D. Feedback for Learners in Medical Education: What Is Known? A Scoping Review. Acad Med. 2017; 92(9): 1346–54. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001578
    Back to article
  18. 18Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE, 2006; 208 p.
    Back to article
  19. 19Charmaz K, Belgrave L. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. 2012; 2: 347–65. DOI: 10.4135/9781452218403.n25
    Back to article
  20. 20Watling CJ, Lingard L. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Med Teach. 2012; 34(10): 850–61. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.704439
    Back to article
  21. 21Rassos J, Ginsburg S, Stalmeijer RE, Melvin LJ. The Senior Medical Resident’s New Role in Assessment in Internal Medicine. Acad Med. 2022; 97(5): 711–7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004552
    Back to article
  22. 22Ltd. QIP. NVivo (Version 12). 2018.
    Back to article
  23. 23Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough? Qual Health Res. 2017; 27(4): 591–608. DOI: 10.1177/1049732316665344
    Back to article
  24. 24Sargeant J, Lockyer JM, Mann K, Armson H, Warren A, Zetkulic M, et al. The R2C2 Model in Residency Education: How Does It Foster Coaching and Promote Feedback Use? Acad Med; 2018. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002131
    Back to article
  25. 25Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, et al. Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2). Acad Med. 2015; 90(12): 1698–706. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809
    Back to article
  26. 26Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015; 90(5): 609–14. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
    Back to article
  27. 27Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 2016; 50(9): 933–42. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13063
    Back to article
  28. 28Ramani S, Konings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CP. Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(5): 744–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2
    Back to article
  29. 29Ramani S, Konings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM. Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: Swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships. Med Teach. 2019; 41(6): 625–31. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1432850
    Back to article
  30. 30Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2012; 34(10): 787–91. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.684916
    Back to article
  31. 31Schroth ML. The effects of delay of feedback on a delayed concept formation transfer task. Contemporary educational psychology. 1992; 17(1): 78–82. DOI: 10.1016/0361-476X(92)90048-4
    Back to article
  32. 32Wisniewski B, Zierer K, Hattie J. The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 3087. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
    Back to article
  33. 33Ossenberg C, Henderson A, Mitchell M. What attributes guide best practice for effective feedback? A scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019; 24(2): 383–401. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-018-9854-x
    Back to article
  34. 34Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ. 2013; 47(4): 362–74. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12087
    Back to article
  35. 35Ramani S, Könings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CPM. Relationships as the Backbone of Feedback: Exploring Preceptor and Resident Perceptions of Their Behaviors During Feedback Conversations. Acad Med. 2020; 95(7): 1073–81. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002971
    Back to article
  36. 36Nicol D. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assess Eval High Edu. 2010; 35(5): 501–17. DOI: 10.1080/02602931003786559
    Back to article
  37. 37Saddawi-Konefka D, Sullivan A, Beltran C, Baker K. Doing More With Written Feedback: Improving Learner Satisfaction and Reflection With the LEAF (Learner-Engaged Analysis of Feedback) Method. Acad Med. 2021; 96(10): 1425–30. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004046
    Back to article
  38. 38Quinton S, Smallbone T. Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning – a teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2010; 47(1): 125–35. DOI: 10.1080/14703290903525911
    Back to article
  39. 39Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019; 53(1): 76–85. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13645
    Back to article
  40. 40Branfield Day L, Miles A, Ginsburg S, Melvin L. Resident Perceptions of Assessment and Feedback in Competency-Based Medical Education: A Focus Group Study of One Internal Medicine Residency Program. Acad Med. 2020; 95(11): 1712–7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003315
    Back to article
  41. 41Klein R, Julian KA, Snyder ED, Koch J, Ufere NN, Volerman A, et al. Gender Bias in Resident Assessment in Graduate Medical Education: Review of the Literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(5): 712–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04884-0
    Back to article
  42. 42Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender Differences in Attending Physicians’ Feedback to Residents: A Qualitative Analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017; 9(5): 577–85. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00126.1
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1052 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: May 11, 2023
Accepted on: May 29, 2023
Published on: Jun 14, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Alyssa Lip, Christopher J. Watling, Shiphra Ginsburg, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 12 (2023): Issue 1Next article