Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Some Differences in Some: Examining Variability in the Interpretation of Scalars Using Latent Class Analysis Cover

Some Differences in Some: Examining Variability in the Interpretation of Scalars Using Latent Class Analysis

By: Tom Heyman and  Walter Schaeken  
Open Access
|Mar 2015

References

  1. Alter A. L. Oppenheimer D. M. Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle) Psychological Science 2008 19 161 167 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02062.x
  2. Alter A. L. Oppenheimer D. M. Epley N. Eyre R. N. Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007 136 569 576 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569
  3. Antoniou K. Grohmann K. K. Kambanaros M. Katsos N. Baiz S. Goldman N. Hawkes R. Does multilingualism confer an advantage for pragmatic abilities? BUCLD 37: Proceedings of the 37th Boston University Child Language Development – Supplement 2013
  4. Baron-Cohen S. Wheelwright S. Skinner R. Martin J. Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, malesand females, scientists and mathematicians Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2001 31 5 17 10.1023/A:1005653411471
  5. Bonnefon J.-F. Feeney A. Villejoubert G. When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts Cognition 2009 112 249 258 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.005
  6. Bott L. Bailey T. M. Grodner D. Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures Journal of Memory and Language 2012 66 123 142 10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.005
  7. Bott L. Noveck I. A. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences Journal of Memory and Language 2004 51 437 457 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006
  8. Breheny R. Ferguson H. J. Katsos N. Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation Language and Cognitive Processes 2013 28 443 467 10.1080/01690965.2011.649040
  9. Breheny R. Katsos N. Williams J. Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences Cognition 2006 100 434 463 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003
  10. Chevallier C. Wilson D. Happé F. Noveck I. Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2010 40 1104 1117 10.1007/s10803-010-0960-8
  11. Chierchia G. Belletti A. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press 3 39 103
  12. Chierchia G. Fox D. Spector B. Maienborn C. von Heusinger K. Portner P. The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning 2008 Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Dayton C. M. Macready G. B. Concomitant-variable latent-class models Journal of the American Statistical Association 1988 83 173 178 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478584
  14. Degen J. Tanenhaus M. K. Carlson L. Hölscher C. Shipley T. Making inferences: the case of scalar implicature processing Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society 2011 Austin, TX Cognitive Science Society 3299 3304
  15. Degen J. Tanenhaus M. K. Processing scalar implicature: A constraint-based approach Cognitive Science 2014 10.1111/cogs.12171 Advance online publication
  16. De Neys W. d’Ydewalle G. Schaeken W. Vos G. A Dutch, computerized, and group administrable adaptation of the operation span test Psychologica Belgica 2002 42 177 190
  17. De Neys W. Schaeken W. When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature Experimental Psychology 2007 54 128 133 10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.128
  18. Dieussaert K. Verkerk S. Gillard E. Schaeken W. Some effort for some: Further evidence that scalar implicatures are effortful The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011 64 2352 2367 10.1080/17470218.2011.588799
  19. Feeney A. Scrafton S. Duckworth A. Handley S. J. The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004 58 121 132 10.1037/h0085792
  20. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2005 19 25 42 10.1257/089533005775196732
  21. Gibbs R. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986 115 3 25 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.3
  22. Grice H. P. Cole P. Morgan J. L. Logic and conversation Syntax and semantics: Speech acts 1975 New York Academic Press 3 41 58
  23. Grodner D. Klein N. Carbary K. Tanenhaus M. “Some,” and possible all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment Cognition 2010 116 42 55 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014
  24. Hoekstra R. A. Bartels M. Cath D. C. Boomsma D. I. Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): A study in Dutch population and patient groups Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2008 38 1555 1566 10.1007/s10803-008-0538-x
  25. Hofmans J. Kuppens P. Allik J. Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Personality Inventory scales in Dutch language Personality and Individual Differences 2008 45 750 755 10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.004
  26. Huang Y. T. Snedeker J. On-line interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantic-pragmatics interface Cognitive Psychology 2009 58 376 415 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001
  27. Katsos N. Roqueta C. A. Estevan R. A. C. Cummins C. Are children with Specific Language Impairment competent with the pragmatics and logic of quantification? Cognition 2011 119 43 57 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.004
  28. Kutas M. Federmeier K. D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) Annual Review of Psychology 2011 62 621 647 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
  29. Levinson S. C. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature 2000 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  30. Linzer D. A. Lewis J. B. poLCA: an R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis Journal of Statistical Software 2011 42 1 29
  31. Marty P. P. Chemla E. Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with only Frontiers in Psychology 2013 4 403 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00403
  32. McCrae R. R. John O. P. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications Journal of Personality 1992 60 175 215 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
  33. McCutcheon A. L. Latent class analysis 1987 Newbury Park, CA Sage
  34. Nieuwland M. S. Ditman T. Kuperberg G. R. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities Journal of Memory and Language 2010 63 324 346 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.005
  35. Noveck I. A. Reboul A. Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008 11 425 431 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.009
  36. Ortony A. Schallert D. L. Reynolds R. E. Antos S. J. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1978 17 465 477 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9
  37. Pijnacker J. Hagoort P. Buitelaar J. Teunisse J.-P. Geurts B. Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2009 39 607 618 10.1007/s10803-008-0661-8
  38. Politzer-Ahles S. Fiorentino R. The realization of scalar inferences: Context sensitivity without processing cost PLoS ONE 2013 8 e63943 10.1371/journal.pone.0063943
  39. Reber R. Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth Consciousness and Cognition 1999 8 338 342 10.1006/ccog.1999.0386
  40. Rouder J. N. Speckman P. L. Sun D. Morey R. D. Iverson G. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009 16 225 237 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
  41. Sperber D. Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition 1986/1995 Oxford Blackwell
  42. Thompson V. A. Turner J. A. P. Pennycook G. Ball L. J. Brack H. Ophir Y. Ackerman R. The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking Cognition 2013 128 237 251 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012
  43. Tomlinson J. M. Jr. Bailey T. M. Bott L. Possibly all of that and then some: Scalar implicatures are understood in two steps Journal of Memory and Language 2013 69 18 35 10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.bc | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Published on: Mar 13, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2015 Tom Heyman, Walter Schaeken, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.