Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Walloons as General or Specific Others? A Comparison of anti-Walloon and anti-immigrant Attitudes in Flanders Cover

Walloons as General or Specific Others? A Comparison of anti-Walloon and anti-immigrant Attitudes in Flanders

Open Access
|Nov 2017

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Frequency distributions for the anti-immigrant and anti-Walloon items.

Disagree completelyDisagreeNeither agree, nor disagreeAgreeAgree completelyMeanN
Anti-Walloon attitudesq113_1In general, Walloons cannot be trusted.10.459.420.49.10.82.30655
q113_2The Walloons take advantage of our social security system.2.719.926.945.25.43.31651
q113_3The Francophones are a threat to our culture and customs in the Brussels periphery.2.727.828.735.85.13.13645
q113_4The presence of Francophone culture enriches our society.1.517.937.440.23.03.25651
q113_5Most Walloons are lazy. They try to avoid exhausting and heavy work.5.941.131.219.82.02.71651
q113_8The government does more for the Walloons than for the Flemings.1.831.733.428.44.63.02637
Anti-immigrant attitudesq68_1In general, migrants cannot be trusted.6.232.931.024.35.62.90652
q68_3Migrants come here to take advantage of our social security system.2.311.225.142.419.03.65655
q68_4Migrants are a threat to our culture and customs.3.726.717.940.411.43.29656
q68_5The presence of different cultures enriches our society.4.526.425.639.83.73.12652
q68_8Most migrants are lazy. They try to avoid exhausting and heavy work.5.035.931.320.77.22.89651
q70_4The government does more for immigrants than for Belgians.5.825.621.332.514.93.25648

[i] Source: Belgian National Election Study (BNES) 2010. Results are weighted for gender, age and education.

pb-57-3-336-g1.png
Figure 1

Explanation model for anti-Walloon and anti-immigration attitudes.

Table 2

Fit indices for the measurement models of anti-immigrant and anti-Walloon attitudes.

Chi2DfRMSEACFITLISRMR
M11 factor535.8540.1160.8460.8110.073
M22 factors – no error correlations171.3530.0580.9620.9530.035
M32 factors + error corr. – Equal configuration98.5470.0410.9830.9770.027
M4a2 factors + error corr. – Equal factor loadings139.7520.0510.9720.9640.057
M4b2 factors + error corr. – Partially equal factor loadings117.0500.0450.9790.9720.042
M5a2 factors + error corr. – Equal intercepts224.0530.0700.9450.9320.050
M5b2 factors + error corr. – Partially equal intercepts125.3520.0460.9760.9700.045

[i] Source: Belgian National Election Study (BNES) 2010; N = 661.

Table 3

Measurement parameters for anti-immigrant and anti-Walloon attitudes (Model 5b).

Factor1: Anti-immig.Factor2: Anti-Wal.
Par.Est.SEPar.Est.SEPar.Est.SE
q68_1In general, migrants cannot be trusted.0.73(0.02)2.93(0.08)
q68_3Migrants come here to take advantage of our social security system.0.86(0.01)3.50(0.10)
q68_4Migrants are a threat to our culture and customs.0.80(0.02)2.96(0.09)
q68_5The presence of different cultures enriches our society.–0.60(0.03)3.17(0.10)
q68_8Most migrants are lazy. They try to avoid exhausting and heavy work.0.75(0.02)2.81(0.08)
q70_4The government does more for immigrants than for Belgians.0.69(0.02)2.80(0.08)
q113_1In general, Walloons cannot be trusted.0.68(0.02)3.03(0.09)
q113_2The Walloons take advantage of our social security system.0.74(0.02)3.89(0.10)
q113_3The Francophones are a threat to our culture and customs in the Brussels periphery.0.57(0.03)3.44(0.10)
q113_4The presence of Francophone culture enriches our society.–0.35(0.04)3.77(0.12)
q113_5Most Walloons are lazy. They try to avoid exhausing and heavy work.0.66(0.02)3.17(0.09)
q113_8The goverment does more for the Walloons than for the Flemish.0.66(0.02)3.43(0.10)
VariancesLatent means
Par.Est.SEPar.Est.SE
Factor 1: anti-immigrant attitudes0.50(0.04)0.00(–)
Factor 2: anti-Walloon attitudes0.30(0.03)–0.20(0.03)
Correlation (Factor 1, Factor 2)0.65(0.03)

[i] Source: Belgian National Election Study (BNES) 2010; N = 661. The model contains error covariances between the matched item pairs.

Table 4

Full structural equation model explaining anti-immigrant and anti-Walloon attitudes.

Relative deprivationAuthoritarianismSub-national identificationAnti-immigrant attitudesAnti-Walloon attitudes
Direct effectIndirect effectDirect effectIndirect effect
Gender
    Male (ref.cat.)
    Female0.252***0.140–0.1530.151*0.040
Age (in years)0.0250.299***–0.0250.157***0.115**
Educational level
    Primary or lower secondary0.894***0.816***–0.430**0.200*0.710***0.262*0.333**
    Higher secondary0.556***0.678***–0.081–0.0730.548***–0.0950.378***
    Tertiary (ref.cat.)
Religious involvement
    Non-believer/free-thinker–0.054–0.300**–0.136–0.187*–0.211*
    Occasional church attendance (ref.cat.)
    Regular church attendance–0.206*–0.0860.171–0.1040.004
Social capital
    Not a member of association0.356***0.175*0.0750.235***0.205**
    Member of association (ref.cat.)
Relative deprivation0.390***0.261***
Authoritarianism0.502***0.409***
National identification (Flemish vs. Belgian)0.113**0.544***
Proportion of explained variance0.2350.3280.0470.6890.706
Fit indicesChi-square: 668.9*** Df: 276 RMSEA: 0.046 CFI: 0.929 TLI: 0.915 SRMR: 0.044

[i] Source: Belgian National Election Study (BNES) 2010; N = 661; * p < .05 ** p < .01 *** p < .001.

Regression parameters are standardized or, in the case of dummy predictors semi-standardized (i.e. standardized for the dependent variable but not for the predictor).

The impact of education is constrained to be equal across the two prejudices. Note that because the equality constraint is imposed on unstandardized parameters, standardized parameters can be different nevertheless.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.336 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2016
|
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2016
|
Published on: Nov 21, 2017
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Bart Meuleman, Koen Abts, Cecil Meeusen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.