Figure 1
Theoretical model and research questions.
Figure 2
Positive feelings toward different target groups by regional group. Note. Bars are 95% confidence intervals around the mean.
Table 1
Correlations between target-specific positive feelings by regional group (Above diagonal = Walloons; Below diagonal = Flemings).
| Positive feelings toward… | Other regional group | Immigrants | Homosexuals | Jews |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other regional group | — | .352 | .399 | .469 |
| Immigrants | .546 | — | .295 | .423 |
| Homosexuals | .459 | .364 | — | .610 |
| Jews | .483 | .469 | .499 | — |
[i] Note. All correlations are significant p < .001. Correlations in bold are significantly different between the two regional groups.
Figure 3
Generalized prejudice structure in Belgium, Flanders, and Wallonia. Note. Figure represents Model 1b for Belgium and the Configural Invariance Model 4 for Flanders and Wallonia in Appendix A.
Figure 4
Propensity to vote by regional group. Note. Bars are 95% confidence intervals around the mean and can be compared within regions.
Figure 5
Effect size of relation between target-specific negative feelings and PTVs. Note. Effect sizes based on multivariate regression model, controlling for generalized prejudice, age, gender, education, religious practice and SES. Full models in Appendix B. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.