Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding Students’ Instrumental Goals, Motivation Deficits and Achievement: Through the Lens of a Latent Profile Analysis Cover

Understanding Students’ Instrumental Goals, Motivation Deficits and Achievement: Through the Lens of a Latent Profile Analysis

Open Access
|Jul 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Correlations and descriptive statistics for all variables modelled.

12345678
1Proximal externally regulated
2Distal externally regulated.46**
3Distal internally regulated.20**.67**
4Socially regulated.11*.54**.46**
5Amotivation.11**–.16**–.43**–.06
6Deep Approaches–.08.28**.60**.30**–.27**
7Surface Approaches.19**.01.19**.06.33**.32**
8GPA–.07.07.11**.02–.27**.05–.14**
9Gender (female = 1, Male = 2)–.00–.00–.13**–.02.14**–.11**.00–.30**
MEAN4.314.024.092.852.73.523.882.21
SD.83.94.85.94.82.67.65.84
Cronbach’s Alpha.74.78.78.78.86.74.60/
Items443412551

[i] Note: * p < .05; ** p < .01. Measures 1–9 are measured on a scale of 1–6. GPA is measured on scale 0–4.33. Gender is female = 1 and Male = 2.

Table 2

Fit statistics for four Latent Profile Analysis conducted.

Two ClassesThree ClassesFour ClassesFive Classes
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)9739.5229573.6739460.8749376.572
Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)9814.1529676.299591.4779535.162
BIC Sample-Size Adjusted9763.3449606.4299502.5639427.195
Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test0.7650.8250.880.805
Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test00.10.18290.523
Table 3

Three Class Finalized Profile and Class-based ANOVA Results.

Low future oriented (n = 51, 6.5%)Average (n = 596, 76.0%)Highly motivated (n = 137, 17.5%)pFR2
Goals
Distal internally regulated goals3.20a(1.29)3.92b(.62)5.16c(.54)< .0001238.77.38
Proximal externally regulated goals4.00a(1.32)4.20b(.73)4.89c(.75)< .000147.60.11
Distal externally regulated goals2.09a(.56)3.88b(.59)5.30c(.50)< .0001644.96.62
Socially regulated goals1.53a(.55)2.78b(.78)3.63c(1.04)< .0001131.76.25
Amotivation2.76a(.91)2.80a(.77)2.28b(.88)< .000123.38.06
Outcomes
Surface approaches3.87ac(.73)3.79a(.61)3.95bc(.77)< .053.38.01
Deep approaches3.13a(.98)3.39b(.57)3.80c(.74)< .000129.99.07
GPA2.05a(.86)2.20a(.85)2.33a(.82)= .112.21.01
Class N size51596137
Sample proportion6.51%76.02%17.47%
Female/Male class N size16/35181/41559/78
Female/Male N class proportion32%/68%30%/70%43%/57%

[i] Note: Within row means with different letters are significantly (p < .05) different from each other.

figures/Fig01_web.png
Figure 1

Profiled variables and covariates.

Note: All variables presented, except GPA, are measured on a scale of one to six. GPA is measured on a scale of 0 to 4.33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.265 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Published on: Jul 13, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Luke K. Fryer, Anja Van den Broeck, Paul Ginns, Kaori Nakao, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.