Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hydroclimate Variability in the Mainland Southeast Asia During the Last Glacial Maximum Cover

Hydroclimate Variability in the Mainland Southeast Asia During the Last Glacial Maximum

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

oq-11-154-g1.png
Figure 1

Location of the study area on (a) the lower central plain of Thailand (b) situated 1.5 km west of the Provincial Administrative Organisation of Phanthai Norasing sub-district in Samut Sakhon Province, 50 km west of Bangkok, and 5 km north of the upper Gulf of Thailand (red square) (c). The sediment samples were taken from an unnamed open excavation, covering an area of 0.42 km2 and approximately 24 m depth (d). The sampling sites were moved from S1 (orange circle) to S2 (blue circle) caused by the sediment slump along the open pit road.

oq-11-154-g2.png
Figure 2

The lowermost unit A composes of light grey clayey silt (a). It is overlaid by unit B, consisting of interbedded clayey and sandy silt layers (b and c). Unit C is the thick bed of the brown silty sand (d), except for the brown silty sand with calcrete or caliche layer (e) from 18.6 to 18.2 meters BMSL. The uppermost unit D consists of thin beds (5–10 cm thick) of light grey clayey silt (f).

oq-11-154-g3.png
Figure 3

Lithostratigraphy (a), sedimentary compositions (b), mean diameter (c), and LOI at 550 (d) and 950°C (e). The back dash lines are moving average of five data points.

oq-11-154-g4.png
Figure 4

The coarse (C: one percentile) and median (M: fifty percentile) diameters of sediment were illustrated in the CM diagram to elucidate sediment transportation and depositional processes (Passega 1964; Kasim et al. 2023; Miao et al. 2023). According to the river and marine coastal sediment analysis, Passega and Byramjee (1969) established the transportation limits of rolling (Cr), graded suspension (Cs), and uniform suspension (Cu). The diagram is divided into five segments, corresponding points N, O, P, Q, R, S, and T. They consist of rolling (NO), bottom suspension and rolling (OPQ), graded suspension without rolling (QR), uniform suspension (RS), and pelagic suspension (T) (Kasim et al., 2023). The CM diagram demonstrates that pelagic suspension (T) plays a crucial role in the sediment transportation in the sedimentary units A and D, along with subunits B1, B3, and B5 (the circles). The sediment transportation mechanisms shift to uniform suspension (RS) in subunits B2 and B4 (the triangles), and suspension and rolling (PQ) in unit C (the squares), suggesting an increase in transportation energy.

oq-11-154-g5.png
Figure 5

Lithostratigraphy (a), the variation of Fe (b), K (c), Cl (d), Ti (e), Ca (f), Ba (g), Zr (h), Rb (i), Sr (j), and Zn (k) concentrations, as well as the K/Ti ratios (l). The back dash lines are moving average of five data points.

Table 1

The correlation metric assesses the relationship between the concentrations of geochemical components within the sedimentary sequence. The grey highlights indicate the strong correlation of r values over 0.7. The p-values are below 0.001, indicating statistical significance.

ClKTiFeZnRbSrZrBa
Cl1.00
K–0.111.00
Ti0.010.911.00
Fe–0.040.750.671.00
Zn–0.080.950.930.801.00
Rb0.090.820.920.590.811.00
Sr0.110.00–0.040.080.07–0.051.00
Zr0.210.370.470.010.380.35–0.021.00
Ba0.000.280.220.150.270.180.350.181.00
oq-11-154-g6.png
Figure 6

Lithostratigraphy and pollen stratigraphy. The red crosses are the sample that pollen is indeterminable.

Table 2

14C dates for the sediment sequence. Calibration of 14C dates is according to Reimer et al. (2020) and was made with the Calib 8.2 online program (http://calib.org/calib/calib.html). * are radiocarbon dating samples excluded in the age-depth plot in Figure 7.

LAB CODESAMPLE TYPEFRACTION OF MODERNRADIOCARBON AGE (KA BP)DEPTH (M BMSL)2-SIGMA (CAL KA BP)MEDIAN (CAL KA BP)
pMCERRORBP 1ERROR
D-AMS 050257Bulk sediment6.2910.0822.220.10224.3226.11–26.9226.51
D-AMS 048747*Bulk sediment16.850.1314.310.06224.3017.12–17.7317.39
D-AMS 050258*Bulk sediment2.4730.05329.720.17221.9433.91–34.5534.27
D-AMS 048748Bulk sediment9.330.1119.050.09520.8822.70–23.1922.99
D-AMS 050259*Bulk sediment6.140.1122.420.14420.1626.38–27.1126.74
D-AMS 050260Bulk sediment9.6240.0918.810.07517.3022.50–22.9522.73
oq-11-154-g7.png
Figure 7

Lithostratigraphy (a) and the age-depth model (b) rely on three radiocarbon dating. The sedimentation rate is approximately 0.1 cm/year in units A and B and significantly increases to 1.42 cm/year in units C and D.

oq-11-154-g8.png
Figure 8

The sedimentary compositions, mean grain size, and the K/Ti ratios show the hydroclimatic change from 26.5 to 22.8 cal ka BP. The results indicate an intense runoff and increased rainfall from 26.5 to 24.6 cal ka BP, followed by a short period of drier conditions about 24.6–24.1 cal ka BP (red shading). Subsequently, there was a progressive decrease in the river runoff and precipitation until 23 cal ka BP, followed by notable wet conditions from 23–22.8 cal ka BP (blue shading). It was then terminated by a sudden lower runoff and precipitation after 22.8 cal ka BP. A comparison of the K/Ti ratio in recent sediment (red dash line) (Hossain et al., 2017) suggests that there may have been similar precipitation amount during the LGM and the present day.

oq-11-154-g9.png
Figure 9

Comparison between the K/Ti ratios (c, red circles) and the δ18O values obtained from Hin Tum Cave (a, yellow circles), Padamya Cave (b, green circles), and Gunung Buda National Park (d, blue circles) in the western Pacific Ocean, and El Condor (e, green squares) and Cueva del Diamante Caves (f, yellow squares) in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Locations of the site in the east Pacific Ocean are shown in Figure 10 and Table 3. El Condor Cave is located 5.93°S and 77.3°W, while Cueva del Diamante is located at 5.73°S and 77.5°W.

Table 3

Palaeo-records and -proxies included in the compilation. The age assignments are determined using published 14C and U/Th dates. The number of dates within the time interval of 26–20 cal ka BP for each sequence is indicated in parentheses. See Figure 9 for the location of the sites.

SITE NO.SITE NAMELAT (°)LONG (°)ELEVATION (M A.S.L.)ARCHIVEPROXYAGE ASSIGNMENTREFERENCES
1GeoB10053-7–8.68112.87–1375MarineTi/Ca14C (2)Mohtadi et al. (2011); Ruan et al. (2019); Ruan et al. (2020)
2Situ Bayongbong swamp–7.18107.281300TerrestrialPollen14C (1)Stuijts et al. (1988)
3Bandung basin–7108665TerrestrialPollen14C (1)van der Kaars & Dam (1995)
4BAR94-42–6.75102.42–2542MarinePollen14C (2)van der Kaars et al. (2010)
5MD98-2152–6.33103.88–1796Marineδ13Cwax14C (2)Windler et al. (2019)
6di Atas lake–1.07100.771535TerrestrialPollen14C (2)Newsome & Flenley (1988)
7SO189-39KL–0.7899.99–517Marineδ18Osw14C (11)Mohtadi et al. (2014)
8Sentarum lake0.73112.135–50TerrestrialPollen14C (1)Anshari et al. (2001)
9SO189-144KL1.1598.05–481MarineδD and
δ13Cwax, and δ18Osw
14C (6)Niedermeyer et al. (2014); Mohtadi et al. (2014)
10Pee Bullok swamp2.2898.981400TerrestrialPollen14C (4)Maloney & McCormac (1996)
11Pea Sim-sim swamp2.2998.891450TerrestrialPollen14C (4)Maloney (1980)
12BJ8-03-91GGC2.87118.38–2326Marineδ13Cwax14C (1)Dubois et al. (2014)
13Saleh Cave3.03115.9848Terrestrialδ13Cwax14C (3)Wurster et al. (2019)
14Tasek Bera basin3.06102.6420–30TerrestrialHardwood
remain
14C (1)Wüst & Bustin (2004)
15Batu Cave3.21101.7Terrestrialδ13Cwax14C (1)Wurster et al. (2010)
16Liang Mbelen Cave3.4698.15Terrestrialδ13Cwax14C (3)McCarthy et al. (2022)
17SO189-119KL3.5296.32–808Marineδ18Osw14C (2)Mohtadi et al. (2014)
18Niah Cave3.82113.77N/ATerrestrialδ13Cwax14C (1)Wurster et al. (2010)
19Cave in Gunung Buda National Park4.00114.00~1000Terrestrialδ18OU/Th (9)Partin et al. (2007)
20SO183024.15108.5783MarinePollen14C (1)Wang et al. (2009)
21SO183004.35108.6591MarinePollen14C (1)Wang et al. (2009)
22MD01-239310.50110.05–1230MarineClay minerals14C (1)Colin et al. (2010)
23The lower central plain of Thailand13.53100.371.8TerrestrialK/Ti14C (3)This study
24Hin Tum Cave15.0299.43N/ATerrestrialδ18OU/Th (3)Liu et al. (2020)
25Padamya cave16.8397.71N/ATerrestrialδ18OU/Th (5)Liu et al. (2020)
26Hoa Huong Cave17.50106.20411TerrestrialMg/Ca and δ13CU/Th (5)Patterson et al. (2023)
27Kwan Phayao19.1799.87380TerrestrialPollen14C (1)Penny & Kealhofer (2005)
28Tham Lod Rockshelter19.5798.89640Terrestrialδ13C and δ18O14C (5)Suraprasit et al. (2021); Marwick & Gargen (2011)
29Lin Noe Cave21.2396.43N/ATerrestrialδ18OU/Th (10)Liu et al. (2020)
30Unnamed Cave23.50104.00N/ATerrestrialδ18OU/Th (10)Liu et al. (2020)
oq-11-154-g10.png
Figure 10

Compilation of the results obtained from the lower central plain of Thailand and the previous studies, indicate a comparable precipitation amount between the LGM and the present. See Table 3 for detail of each site.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.154 | Journal eISSN: 2055-298X
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2025
Published on: Jul 28, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Akkaneewut Jirapinyakul, Dissaya Sukaudom, Chawalit Charoenpong, Penjai Sompongchaikul, Paramita Punwong, Kweku Afrifa Yamoah, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.