Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Words, Species, and Kinds Cover

Words, Species, and Kinds

By: J. T. M. Miller  
Open Access
|Nov 2021

References

  1. Anderson, RP and Handley, CO. 2001. A new species of three-toed sloth (Mammalia: Xenarthra) from Panama, with a review of the genus Bradypus. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 114: 133.
  2. Boyd, RN. 1990. Realism, approximate truth, and philosophical method. In: Savage, CW (ed.), Scientific theories, 355391. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Boyd, RN. 1991. Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies, 61: 127148. DOI: 10.1007/BF00385837
  4. Boyd, RN. 1999a. Kinds, complexity and multiple realization. Philosophical Studies, 95: 6798. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004511407133
  5. Boyd, RN. 1999b. Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson, RA (ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays, 141185. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Boyd, RN. 2000. Kinds as the ‘‘workmanship of men’’: Realism, constructivism, and natural kinds. In: Nida-Rümelin, J (ed.), Rationalitat, Realismus, Revision: Vortra¨ge des 3. Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft fur Analytische Philosophie, 5289. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110805703.52
  7. Boyd, RN. 2003a. Finite beings, finite goods: The semantics, metaphysics and ethics of naturalist consequentialism, Part I. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVI: 505553. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00278.x
  8. Boyd, RN. 2003b. Finite beings, finite goods: The semantics, metaphysics and ethics of naturalist consequentialism, Part II. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVII: 2447. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00024.x
  9. Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Bromberger, S. 1989. Types and Tokens in Linguistics. In: George, A (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky, 5889. Basil Blackwell.
  11. Burge, T. 1979. Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 4: 73121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x
  12. Cappelen, H. 1999. Intentions in Words. Nous, 33(1): 92102. DOI: 10.1111/0029-4624.00143
  13. Ereshefsky, M. 2010. What’s Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 77: 674685. DOI: 10.1086/656545
  14. Ereshefsky, M and Reydon, TAC. 2015. Scientific Kinds. Philosophical Studies, 172: 969986. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-014-0301-4
  15. Goodman, N. 1955. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP.
  16. Griffiths, PE. 1997. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226308760.001.0001
  17. Irmak, N. 2019. An Ontology of Words. Erkenntnis, 84(5): 11391158. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-018-0001-0
  18. Kaplan, D. 1990. Words. Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 64: 93119. DOI: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/64.1.93
  19. Kaplan, D. 2011. Words on Words. Journal of Philosophy, 108(9): 504529. DOI: 10.5840/2011108926
  20. Katz, JJ. 2000. Realistic Rationalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  21. Machery, E. 2009. Doing Without Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306880.001.0001
  22. Miller, JTM. 2020a. On the Individuation of Words. Inquiry. Online first. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1562378
  23. Miller, JTM. 2020b. The Ontology of Words: Realism, Nominalism, and Eliminativism. Philosophy Compass, 15(7): 113. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12691
  24. Miller, JTM. 2021. A Bundle Theory of Words. Synthese, 198: 57315748. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02430-3
  25. Nefdt, RM. 2019. The ontology of words: A structural approach. Inquiry, 62(8): 877911. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1562967
  26. Peregrin, J. 2008. Inferentialist Approach to Semantics. Philosophy Compass, 3: 12081223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00179.x
  27. Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7: 131193.
  28. Rieppel, O. 2010. New Essentialism in Biology. Philosophy of Science, 77(5): 662673. DOI: 10.1086/656539
  29. Samuels, R and Ferreira, M. 2010. Why don’t concepts constitute a natural kind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 222223. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12691
  30. Szabó, Z. 1999. Expressions and their representations. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49(195): 145163. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9213.00134
  31. Taylor, H. 2018. Emotions, concepts and the indeterminacy of natural kinds. Synthese, 197(5): 20732093. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-1783-y
  32. Taylor, H. 2019. Whales, fish and Alaskan bears: interest-relative taxonomy and kind pluralism in biology. Synthese, 198(4): 33693387. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02284-9
  33. Wetzel, L. 2006. Types and Tokens. In: Zalta, EN (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition).
  34. Wetzel, L. 2009. Types and Tokens: An Essay on Abstract Objects. Boston, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262013017.001.0001
  35. Wilson, R, Barker, M and Brigandt, I. 2007. When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds. Philosophical Topics, 35(1/2): 189215. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics2007351/29
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.70 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: May 18, 2021
|
Accepted on: Nov 6, 2021
|
Published on: Nov 24, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 J. T. M. Miller, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.