Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
pumBayes: Estimating Ideal Points from Voting Data in R Using Unfolding Models Cover

pumBayes: Estimating Ideal Points from Voting Data in R Using Unfolding Models

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Bhattacherjee A. Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida; 2012.
  2. Fox JP. Bayesian item response modeling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer; 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0742-4
  3. Mair P, Hatzinger R. Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2007;20:120. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v020.i09
  4. Rizopoulos D. ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software. 2006;17:125. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v017.i05
  5. Chalmers RP. mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48(6):129. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
  6. Strobl C, Kopf J, Zeileis A. Rasch trees: A new method for detecting differential item functioning in the Rasch model. Psychometrika. 2015;80:289316. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9388-3
  7. Komboz B, Strobl C, Zeileis A. Tree-based global model tests for polytomous Rasch models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2018;78(1):128166. DOI: 10.1177/0013164416664394
  8. Martin AD, Quinn KM, Park JH. MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011; 42(9):122. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v042.i09
  9. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014;67:148. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  10. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48:136. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  11. Hadfield JD. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;33:122. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v033.i02
  12. Bürkner PC. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017;80:128. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
  13. Bürkner PC. Bayesian item response modeling in R with brms and Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 2021;100:154. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v100.i05
  14. Davis OA, Hinich MJ, Ordeshook PC. An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review. 1970;64(2): 426448. DOI: 10.2307/1953842
  15. Enelow JM, Hinich MJ. The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. Cambridge: CUP Archive; 1984.
  16. Poole K, Lewis J, Lo J, Carroll R. Scaling roll call votes with wnominate in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;42(14):121. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v042.i14
  17. Jackman S. pscl: Classes and methods for R developed in the political science computational laboratory. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney. R package version 1.5.9. 2024. Available from: https://github.com/atahk/pscl/
  18. Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S. Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2008; 27(8):125. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v027.i08
  19. Lewis J. Why is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez estimated to be a moderate by NOMINATE? 2019. https://voteview.com/articles/ocasio_cortez
  20. Lewis J. Why are Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Pressley, and Talib estimated to be moderates by NOMINATE? 2019. https://voteview.com/articles/Ocasio-Cortez_Omar_Pressley_Tlaib
  21. Yu X, Rodriguez A. Spatial voting models in circular spaces: A case study of the US house of representatives. The Annals of Applied Statistics. 2021;15(4):18971922. DOI: 10.1214/21-AOAS1454
  22. Duck-Mayr J, Montgomery J. Ends against the middle: Measuring latent traits when opposites respond the same way for antithetical reasons. Political Analysis. 2023; 31(4):606625. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2022.33
  23. Tendeiro JN, Castro-Alvarez S. GGUM: An R package for fitting the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2019;43(2):172173. DOI: 10.1177/0146621618772290
  24. Roberts JS, Fang H-R, Cui W, Wang Y. GGUM2004: A windows-based program to estimate parameters in the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2006;30(1):6465. DOI: 10.1177/0146621605280141
  25. King DR, Roberts JS. ScoreGGUM: An R package for estimating GGUM person parameters using pre-calibrated item parameters and disagree–agree response data. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2015;39(6):494495. DOI: 10.1177/0146621615570469
  26. Johnson MS, Junker BW. Using data augmentation and Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation of unfolding item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2003;28:195230. DOI: 10.3102/10769986028003195
  27. de la Torre J, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of item parameters for the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2006;30(3):216232. DOI: 10.1177/0146621605282772
  28. Wang W, de la Torre J, Drasgow F. MCMC GGUM: A new computer program for estimating unfolding IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2015;39(2):160161. DOI: 10.1177/0146621614540514
  29. Tu N, Zhang B, Angrave L, Sun T. bmggum: An R package for Bayesian estimation of the multidimensional generalized graded unfolding model with covariates. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2021;45(7–8):553555. DOI: 10.1177/01466216211040488
  30. Lei R, Rodriguez A. A novel class of unfolding models for binary preference data. Political Analysis. 2024;1:117. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2024.11
  31. Albert JH, Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1993;88(422):669679. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321
  32. Lei R, Rodriguez A. Logit unfolding choice models for binary data. Statistics and Computing. 2025;35(2):41. DOI: 10.1007/s11222-025-10570-5
  33. Jackman S. Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: Identification, estimation, inference, and model checking. Political Analysis. 2001;9(3):227241. DOI: 10.1093/polana/9.3.227
  34. Watanabe S, Opper M. Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2010;11:35713594. DOI: 10.5555/1756006.1953045
  35. Watanabe S. A widely applicable Bayesian information criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2013;14(1): 867897. https://jmlr.org/papers/v14/watanabe13a.html
  36. Gelman A, Hwang J, Vehtari A. Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Statistics and Computing. 2014;24(6):9971016. DOI: 10.1007/s11222-013-9416-2
  37. Martin AD, Quinn KM. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the US Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis. 2002;10(2):134153. DOI: 10.1093/pan/10.2.134
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.631 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 40
Submitted on: Oct 13, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2026
Published on: May 28, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Skylar Shi, Abel Rodríguez, Rayleigh Lei, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.