Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
LASPATED: A Library for the Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Discrete Data Cover

LASPATED: A Library for the Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Discrete Data

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Space discretization of a region containing the city of Rio de Janeiro into 10×10=100 rectangles, 76 of which have nonempty intersection with the region and are shown in the figure.

Figure 2

Space discretization of a region containing the city of Rio de Janeiro into hexagons using the Uber library H3 with scale parameter equal to 7.

Figure 3

Space discretization of a region containing the city of Rio de Janeiro into 160 administrative districts.

Figure 4

Aggregated estimates of the intensities for 3 estimators: (i) Empirical: the empirical intensities, (ii) Rectangular 10×10: Model M1 with the 10×10 rectangular space discretization, and (iii) Covariates, rectangular 10×10: Model M2 with the 10×10 rectangular space discretization. Top left: emergencies of all priorities, top right: high-priority emergencies, bottom left: intermediate priority emergencies, bottom right: low-priority emergencies.

Figure 5

Aggregated estimates of the intensities for 3 estimators: (i) Empirical: the empirical intensities, (ii) Hexagonal 7: Model M1 with hexagonal discretization with scale parameter 7, and (iii) Covariates, hexagonal 7: Model M2 with hexagonal discretization with scale parameter 7. Top left: emergencies of all priorities, top right: high-priority emergencies, bottom left: intermediate priority emergencies, bottom right: low-priority emergencies.

Figure 6

Aggregated estimates of the intensities for 3 estimators: (i) Empirical: the empirical intensities, (ii) District: Model M1 with the space discretization by districts, (iii) Covariates, district: Model M2 with the space discretization by districts. Top left: emergencies of all priorities, top right: high-priority emergencies, bottom left: intermediate priority emergencies, bottom right: low-priority emergencies.

Figure 7

Space discretization of a region containing the city of Rio de Janeiro into 100×100=10000 rectangles, 4916 of which have nonempty intersection with the region and are shown in the figure.

Figure 8

Space discretization of a region containing the city of Rio de Janeiro into hexagons using the Uber library H3 with scale parameter equal to 8.

Figure 9

Discretization of a region containing the city of Rio de Janeiro into 34 subregions, given by the Voronoi diagram of ambulance stations in Rio de Janeiro.

Figure 10

4 types of land use in Rio de Janeiro.

Table 2

Mean relative error e. In column 1, m/n denotes Ni,t=m for non-holiday time periods t, and Ni,t=n for holiday time periods t.

SAMPLE SIZE Ni,tHOLIDAYCOVNO COV 1NO COV 2NO COV 3EMP
5200.0060.0120.0480.0480.048
52000.0020.0040.0150.0150.015
78000.0010.0030.0120.0120.012
51/110.0670.0630.1380.1380.154
510/1010.0270.0500.0650.0650.049
765/1510.0180.0380.0540.0540.040
Figure 11

Test region S=[0,10]2. The intensity function λ is different in the blue and red subregions, but the user does not know about these subregions. For estimation purposes, the user discretizes S into 10×10=100 square zones.

Figure 12

Intensities as a function of location, for time intervals that start at odd times and even times. (a) Time intervals that start at odd times. (b) Time intervals that start at even times.

Figure 13

Mean relative estimation errors 1|I||T|iItT|λi,tλ^i,twλi,t| as a function of the penalty parameter w, for four sample sizes and six estimators (including the empirical estimator at w=0).

Table 1

The column headings denote the estimators as follows: Reg 1: estimator with partition G4 of time intervals and with neighbor-based spatial regularization; Reg 2: estimator with partition G4 of time intervals and without spatial regularization; Reg 3: estimator with partition G2 of time intervals and with neighbor-based spatial regularization; Reg 4: estimator with partition G2 of time intervals and without spatial regularization; CV: cross validation; Emp: empirical estimator. For each sample size and for each estimator Reg 1, Reg 2, Reg 3, Reg 4, each cell of the table gives two numbers separated by a slash (/): the first number is the minimum mean relative error over different values of penalty parameter w, and the second number is the value of w that attains the minimum. For the cross validation estimator, the first number is the mean relative error using the penalty parameter w, and the second number is the value of w. For the empirical estimator, the first number is the mean relative error using the penalty parameter w=0.

SAMPLE SIZE Ni,tREG 1REG 2REG 3REG 4CVEMP
10.47/1.20.67/2.00.34/0.60.51/1.4-1.539/0
100.31/0.060.30/0.20.26/0.060.17/0.20.42/0.20.543/0
500.18/0.0080.12/0.040.15/0.0040.08/0.0360.37/0.040.256/0
5000.08/0.00.03/0.0040.08/0.00.02/0.00280.26/0.0020.07687/0
Figure 14

Comparison of true, empirical, and regularized estimates of the Poisson process intensities. True intensities as shown in Figure 12.

Figure 15

Intensities as a function of location, for time intervals that start at odd times and even times. (a) Time intervals that start at odd times. (b) Time intervals that start at even times.

Figure 16

Mean relative errors 1|I||T|tTiI|Riλ(x,y,t)d(x,y)λ^t,iw|Riλ(x,y,t)d(x,y) as a function of the penalty parameter w. Intensities λ(x,y,t) are as shown in Figure 15.

Figure 17

Graph of covariate function x1.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.544 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 51
Submitted on: Nov 15, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 24, 2026
Published on: Jul 8, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Vincent Guigues, Anton Kleywegt, Giovanni Amorim, André Krauss, Victor Hugo Nascimento, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.