Have a personal or library account? Click to login
bbsBayes: An R Package for Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of North American Breeding Bird Survey Data Cover

bbsBayes: An R Package for Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of North American Breeding Bird Survey Data

Journal of Open Research Software
Volume 9 (2021): Issue 1
By: Brandon P. M. Edwards and  Adam C. Smith  
Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. 1Hudson MAR, Francis CM, Campbell KJ, Downes CM, Smith AC, Pardieck KL. The role of the North American Breeding Bird Survey in conservation. The Condor. 2017; 119(3): 526–545. DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-17-62.1
    Back to article
  2. 2Sauer JR, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ, Jr., Smith AC, Hudson MAR, Rodriguez V, Berlanga H, Niven DL, Link, WA. The first 50 years of the North American Breeding Bird Survey. The Condor. 2017; 119(3): 576–593. DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-17-83.1
    Back to article
  3. 3Downes CM, Hudson MAR, Smith AC, Francis CM. The Breeding Bird Survey at 50: scientists and birders working together for bird conservation. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 2016; 11(1): 8. DOI: 10.5751/ACE-00855-110108
    Back to article
  4. 4United States Geological Survey, 2019. BBS Bibliography. Available at https://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/BBS/Bibliography/.
    Back to article
  5. 5Miller DAW, Pacifici K, Sanderlin JS, Reich BJ. The recent past and promising future for data integration methods to estimate species’ distributions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019; 10: 22–37. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13110
    Back to article
  6. 6Sullivan BL, et al. The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation. 2014; 169: 31–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003
    Back to article
  7. 7Robinson OJ, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Reynolds MD, Golet GH, Strimas-Mackey M, Fink D. Integrating citizen science data with expert surveys increases accuracy and spatial extent of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions. 2020; 26(8): 976–986. DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13068
    Back to article
  8. 8Maxwell MB, Pavlacky DC, Jr., Bartuszevige AM. Data fusion for abundance estimation: community science augments systematically collected removal-in-time distance sampling data. bioRxiv. 2021; 1–26. DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.02.442379
    Back to article
  9. 9Fink D, Auer T, Johnston A, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Hochachka WM, Kelling S. Modelling avian full annual cycle distributions and population trends with citizen science data. Ecological Applications. 2019; 30(3): e02056. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2056
    Back to article
  10. 10Smith AC, Edwards BPM. North American Breeding Bird Survey status and trend estimates to inform a wide range of conservation needs, using a flexible Bayesian hierarchical generalized additive model. Ornithological Applications. 2020; 123(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.26.010215
    Back to article
  11. 11Rosenberg KV, Dokter AM, Blancher PJ, Sauer JR, Smith AC, Smith PA, Stanton JC, Panjabi A, Helft L, Parr M, Marra PP. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. 2019; 366(6461): 120–124. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1313
    Back to article
  12. 12North American Bird Conservation Initiative. The State of North America’s Birds 2016. Ottawa: Environment and Climate Change Canada 2016; 1–8.
    Back to article
  13. 13North American Bird Conservation Initiative Canada. The State of Canada’s Birds 2019. Ottawa: Environment and Climate Change Canada 2019; 1–12. DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v128i2.1565
    Back to article
  14. 14Smith AC, Hudson MAR, Downes C, Francis CM. Estimating breeding bird survey trends and annual indices for Canada: how do the new hierarchical Bayesian estimates differ from previous estimates? The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 2014; 128(2): 119–134. DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v128i2.1565
    Back to article
  15. 15Sauer JR, Link WA. Hierarchical models and the analysis of bird survey information. Ornis Hungarica. 2003; 12–13(1–2): 217–222.
    Back to article
  16. 16Sauer JR, Link WA. Analysis of the North American Breeding Bird Survey using hierarchical models. Auk. 2011; 128(1): 87–98. DOI: 10.1525/auk.2010.09220
    Back to article
  17. 17Link WA, Sauer JR, Niven DK. Model selection for the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Ecological Applications. 2020; 30: e02137. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2137
    Back to article
  18. 18Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ, Jr., Lutmerding M, Aponte VI, Hudson MAR. North American Breeding Bird Survey Dataset 1966–2019: U.S. Geological Survey data release. 2020. DOI: 10.5066/P9J6QUF6
    Back to article
  19. 19Evans M, Gow E, Roth RR, Johnson MS, Underwood TJ. Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), version 2.0. In The Birds of North America (A. F. Poole, Editor), 2011. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. DOI: 10.2173/bna.246
    Back to article
  20. 20Winslow LA, Chamberlain S, Appling AP, Read JS. sbtools: A package connecting R to cloud-based data for collaborative online research. The R Journal. 2016; 8: 387–398. DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2016-029
    Back to article
  21. 21Bird Studies Canada and North American Bird Conservation Initiative. Bird Conservation Regions. Published by Bird Studies Canada on behalf of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative 2014. http://www.birdscanada.org/research/gislab/index.jsp?targetpg=bcr Accessed: 4 January 2019.
    Back to article
  22. 22North American Breeding Bird Survey. 2021. https://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/ Accessed 15 June 2021.
    Back to article
  23. 23Smith AC, Hudson MAR, Aponte V, Francis CM. North American Breeding Bird Survey – Canadian Trends Website, Data-version 2017. Environment and Climate Change Canada 2019.
    Back to article
  24. 24Crainiceanu CM, Ruppert D, Wand MP. Bayesian Analysis for Penalized Spline Regression Using WinBUGS. Journal of Statistical Software. 2005; 14(14). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v014.i14
    Back to article
  25. 25Plummer MA. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling; 2003.
    Back to article
  26. 26Stan Development Team. Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual, v2.27; 2021. https://mc-stan.org.
    Back to article
  27. 27Kellner K. jagsUI: A Wrapper Around ‘rjags’ to Streamline ‘JAGS’ Analyses. R package version 1.5.0; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jagsUI.
    Back to article
  28. 28Knape J. Decomposing trends in Swedish bird populations using generalized additive mixed models. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016; 53: 1852–1861. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12720
    Back to article
  29. 29Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science. 1992; 7(4): 457–472. DOI: 10.1214/ss/1177011136
    Back to article
  30. 30Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2016; New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
    Back to article
  31. 31Hafen R. geofacet: ‘ggplot2’ Faceting Utilities for Geographical Data. R package version 0.1.10; 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geofacet.
    Back to article
  32. 32Auguie B. gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for “Grid” Graphics. R package version 2.3; 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gridExtra.
    Back to article
  33. 33Garnier S. viridis: Default Color Maps from ‘matplotlib’. R package version 0.5.1; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=viridis.
    Back to article
  34. 34Wickham H. testthat: Get Started with Testing. The R Journal. 2011; 3(1): 5–10. DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2011-002
    Back to article
  35. 35Csárdi G, FitzJohn R. progress: Terminal Progress Bars. R package version 1.2.0; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=progress.
    Back to article
  36. 36Slowikowski K. ggrepel: Automatically Position Non-Overlapping Text Labels with ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.8.2; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggrepel.
    Back to article
  37. 37Wickham H. stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. R package version 1.3.1; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr.
    Back to article
  38. 38R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
    Back to article
  39. 39Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B. rgdal: Bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library. R package version 1.3-6; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal.
    Back to article
  40. 40Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.3; 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
    Back to article
  41. 41Pebesma E. Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data. The R Journal. 2018; 10(1): 439–446. DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2018-009
    Back to article
  42. 42Sarkar D, Andrews F. latticeExtra: Extra Graphical Utilities Based on Lattice. R package version 0.6-28; 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=latticeExtra.
    Back to article
  43. 43Ratnakumar S, Mick T, Davis T. rappdirs: Application Directories: Determine Where to Save Data, Caches, and Logs. R package version 0.3.1; 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rappdirs.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.329 | Journal eISSN: 2049-9647
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2020
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2021
Published on: Jul 20, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
United States Geological Survey,
Canadian Wildlife Service,
Breeding Bird Survey,
demographics,
mcmc,
Bayesian,
conservation

© 2021 Brandon P. M. Edwards, Adam C. Smith, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2021): Issue 1Next article