Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Benchmark Dilemma: Between Representativeness and Domain-Specificity in Visual Arts Domains Cover

A Benchmark Dilemma: Between Representativeness and Domain-Specificity in Visual Arts Domains

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Canny, J. (2009). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence (6), 679–698. 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851
  2. Carion, N., Gustafson, L., Hu, Y.-T., Debnath, S., Hu, R., Suris, D., …, Feichtenhofer, C. (2026). Sam 3: Segment anything with concepts. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16719.
  3. Cetinic, E. (2021). Towards generating and evaluating iconographic image captions of artworks. Journal of Imaging, 7(8). Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2313-433X/7/8/123
  4. Choudhury, M. D. (2021). Automated identification of painters over wikiart image data using machine learning algorithms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dublin, National College of Ireland.
  5. de Beyssat, C. D. (2025). Victims of Posterity. Identifying Gaps on 19th-Century French Art History with Wikidata. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 11(1). 10.5334/johd.399
  6. Dodge, S., & Karam, L. (2016). Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks. In 2016 eighth international conference on quality of multimedia experience (qomex) (pp. 1–6). 10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498955
  7. Fang, Y., Sun, Q., Wang, X., Huang, T., Wang, X., & Cao, Y. (2024). EVA-02: A visual representation for neon genesis. Image and Vision Computing, 149, 105171. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0262885624002762
  8. Gadre, S. Y., Ilharco, G., Fang, A., Hayase, J., Smyrnis, G., Nguyen, T., …, Schmidt, L. (2023). DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets. In A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, & S. Levine (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems vol. 36, 27092–27112. Curran Associates, Inc. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/file/56332d41d55ad7ad8024aac625881be7-Paper-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf
  9. Garcia, N., & Vogiatzis, G. (2018). How to read paintings: semantic art understanding with multi-modal retrieval. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops. 10.1007/978-3-030-11012-3_52
  10. Hansen, L. B. P., Eriksen, R. S., Feldkamp, P., Lassche, A., Nielbo, K., Baunvig, K., & Bizzoni, Y. (2025a). Framing the Canon: A Computational Study of Canonicity in Danish Golden Age Paintings (1750–1870). Anthology of Computers and the Humanities, 3, 339–356. 10.63744/KTLpQIY247dD
  11. Hansen, L. B. P., Kostkan, J., Rocca, R., & Nielbo, K. L. (2025b). Multimodal Pre-Training of Vision Models Yields Better Embeddings for Visual Art. In Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications. 10.5617/dhnbpub.12286
  12. Hermann, K., Chen, T., & Kornblith, S. (2020). The origins and prevalence of texture bias in convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 19000–19015.
  13. Hudson, G., Léger, A., Niss, B., Sebestyén, I., & Vaaben, J. (2018). JPEG-1 standard 25 years: past, present, and future reasons for a success. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 27(4), 040901. 10.1117/1.JEI.27.4.040901
  14. Khan, F. S., Beigpour, S., Van de Weijer, J., & Felsberg, M. (2014). Painting-91: a large scale database for computational painting categorization. Machine vision and applications, 25(6), 1385–1397. 10.1007/s00138-014-0621-6
  15. Kipke, M., Eriksen, R., Nielbo, K., & Baunvig, K. (2026). The narrative of national romanticism in 19th- Century Painting: The danish golden age and beyond. 10.5281/zenodo.19678439
  16. Li, Q., Xu, C., & Wang, Q. (2026). Art painting classification based on efficient convolutional neural networks. In International conference on computer vision and digital art (iccvda 2025), vol. 14117, pp. 109–114. SPIE. 10.1117/12.3109873
  17. Liao, P., Li, X., Liu, X., & Keutzer, K. (2022). The ArtBench Dataset: Benchmarking Generative Models with Artworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11404.
  18. Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., …, others (2023). Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193.
  19. Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., …, Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00020
  20. Sant, T., & Tabone, E. (2024). Art through Wikidata: A Digital Curation Perspective. Mimesis Journal, 13(2), 379–389.
  21. Schneider, S., Springstein, M., Stalter, J., Ritter, D., Ewerth, R., & Müller-Budack, E. (2026). Uncovering Biases Through Faceted Image Retrieval: Wikidata as a Data Provider for Art-Historical Research. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 12(1). 10.5334/johd.436
  22. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015). Facenet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In Proceedings of the ieee conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, (pp. 815–823). 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298682
  23. Schuhmann, C., Vencu, R., Beaumont, R., Kaczmarczyk, R., Mullis, C., Katta, A., Coombes, T., Jitsev, J., & Komatsuzaki, A. (2021). LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02114
  24. Spinaci, G., Klic, L., Colavizza, G., et al. (2025). Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models in Zero-shot and Few-shot Scenarios: Preliminary Results on Studying Christian Iconography. In Anthology of computers and the humanities (vol. 3, pp. 1198–1210). 10.63744/oxWtm5MhhwBH
  25. Springstein, M., Schneider, S., Rahnama, J., Stalter, J., Kristen, M., Müller-Budack, E., & Ewerth, R. (2024). Visual narratives: Large-scale hierarchical classification of art-historical images. In Proceedings of the ieee/cvf winter conference on applications of computer vision (pp. 7220–7230). 10.1109/WACV57701.2024.00705
  26. Strezoski, G., & Worring, M. (2017). OmniArt: Multi-task Deep Learning for Artistic Data Analysis. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00684
  27. Wasielewski, A. (2023). Computational formalism: Art history and machine learning. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/14268.001.0001
  28. Xiao, C., Chung, I., Kerboua, I., Stirling, J., Zhang, X., Kardos, M., Solomatin, R., Al Moubayed, N., Enevoldsen, K., & Muennighoff, N. (2025). Mieb: Massive image embedding benchmark. In Proceedings of the ieee/cvf international conference on computer vision (pp. 22187–22198). 10.1109/ICCV51701.2025.02060
  29. Zhai, X., Mustafa, B., Kolesnikov, A., & Beyer, L. (2023). Sigmoid Loss for language image pre-training. 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01100
  30. Zhao, W., Zhou, D., Qiu, X., & Jiang, W. (2021). Compare the performance of the models in art classification. Plos one, 16(3), e0248414. 10.1371/journal.pone.0248414
  31. Zweig, B. (2024). Hyperformalism: Notes on Machine Vision and Art Historical Method. In Critical Digital Art History, (pp. 146–166). Intellect. 10.1386/9781789389760_9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.623 | Journal eISSN: 2059-481X
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 133
Submitted on: Jul 27, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 8, 2026
Published on: Oct 13, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Marta Kipke, Louise Brix Pilegaard Hansen, Rie Schmidt Eriksen, Katrine Baunvig, Kristoffer Nielbo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.