Table 1
Corpus statistics and Sense Annotation Coverage.
| UPOS | TOTAL TOKENS | UNIQUE LEMMAS | ANNOTATED TOKENS | COVERAGE (%) | SENSE INV. TOKENS | SENSE INV. (COV. %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOUN | 8,058 | 2,556 | 7,906 | 98.11 | 7,076 | 87.81 |
| VERB | 3,107 | 758 | 3,094 | 99.58 | 2,893 | 93.11 |
| ADJ | 3,275 | 975 | 3,167 | 96.70 | 1,467 | 44.79 |
| ADV | 1,471 | 241 | 1,418 | 96.40 | 0 | 0.00 |
| PROPN | 2,485 | 1,652 | – | – | – | – |
| other UPOS | 20,640 | 569 | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 39,036 | 6,379 | 15,585 | 97.95 | 11,436 | 71.874 |
Table 2
MWE statistics and Sense Annotation Coverage.
| TOTAL OCCURRENCES | UNIQUE MWES | ANNOTATED OCCURRENCES | COVERAGE (%) | SENSE INV MWES | SENSE INV. (COV. %) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWE | 281 | 197 | 229 | 81.49 | 8 | 2.85 |
Table 3
Distribution of Sense Sources Across Content Word Tokens.
| UPOS | SENSE INVENTORY | BABELNET | ANNOTATOR (LEXLI:) | TOTAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNT | % | COUNT | % | COUNT | % | ||
| NOUN | 7,076 | 89.50 | 676 | 8.55 | 154 | 1.95 | 7,906 |
| VERB | 2,893 | 93.50 | 133 | 4.30 | 68 | 2.20 | 3,094 |
| ADJ | 1,467 | 46.32 | 907 | 28.64 | 793 | 25.04 | 3,167 |
| ADV | 0 | 0.00 | 781 | 55.08 | 637 | 44.92 | 1,418 |
| Total | 11,436 | 72.32 | 2,497 | 15.79 | 1,652 | 10.45 | 15,814 |
Table 4
Distribution of Sense Sources Across Content Word Lemmas.
| UPOS | SENSE INVENTORY | BABELNET | ANNOTATOR (LEXLI:) | TOTAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNT | % | COUNT | % | COUNT | % | ||
| NOUN | 2,138 | 86.56 | 487 | 19.72 | 96 | 3.89 | 2,470 |
| VERB | 713 | 94.44 | 84 | 11.13 | 28 | 3.71 | 755 |
| ADJ | 418 | 45.19 | 449 | 48.54 | 144 | 15.57 | 925 |
| ADV | 0 | 0.00 | 204 | 87.93 | 46 | 19.83 | 232 |
| Total | 3,269 | 77.10 | 1,224 | 28.87 | 314 | 7.41 | 4,240 |
