References
- 1Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- 2Bessette, L. S. (2023). Digital Redlining, Minimal Computing, and Equity. In S. Köseoğlu, G. Veletsianos, & C. Rowell (Eds.), Critical Digital Pedagogy in Higher Education, (pp. 69–79). 10.15215/aupress/9781778290015.01
- 3Csicsilla, J. (2004). Canons by Consensus: Critical Trends and American Literature Anthologies. Tuscaloosa: U Alabama P.
- 4Diep, M. (2022). Reducing Digital Discrimination and Stressors by Improving Broadband Adoption in Historically Redlined Areas. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 21(03). 10.38126/JSPG210301
- 5Earhart, A. E. (2025). Digital Literary Redlining: African American Anthologies, Digital Humanities, and the Canon. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
- 6Enszer, J. R. (2016). “She Who Shouts Gets Heard!”: Counting and Accounting for Women Writers in Literary Grants and Norton Anthologies. Feminist Studies, 42(3), 720–737. 10.15767/feministstudies.42.3.0720
- 7Fredner, E., & Porter, J. D. (2024). Counting on The Norton Anthology of American Literature. PMLA, 139(1), 50–65. 10.1632/S0030812923001189
- 8Hall, T. D. (2021). Information Redlining: The Urgency to Close the Digital Access and Literacy Divide and the Role of Libraries as Lead Interveners. Journal of Library Administration, 61(4), 484–492. 10.1080/01930826.2021.1906559
- 9Hanna, A., Denton, E., Smart, A., & Smith-Loud, J. (2020). Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairness. FAT* ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 501–512. 10.1145/3351095.3372826
- 10Levy, M., & Perry, M. (2015). Distantly Reading the Romantic Canon: Quantifying Gender in Current Anthologies. Women’s Writing, 22(2), 132–155. 10.1080/09699082.2015.1011836
- 11McCall, T., Asuzu, K., Oladele, C. R., Leung, T., & Wang, K. (2022). A Socio-Ecological Approach to Addressing Digital Redlining in the United States: A Call to Action for Health Equity. Frontiers in Digital Health,
4 . 10.3389/fdgth.2022.897250 - 12McPherson, T. (2015).
Post-Archive: The Humanities, the Archive, and the Database . In P. Svensson & D. T. Goldberg (Eds.), Between Humanities and the Digital (pp. 483–502). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9465.003.0041 - 13Mezey, N. (2003). Erasure and recognition: The census, race and the national imagination. Northwestern University Law Review, 97(4), 1701–1768.
- 14Nobles, M. (2000). Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804780131
- 15Parks, J. (2021). Tech-savvy redlining: Understanding technology’s role in educational segregation. In E. Langran & D. Routledge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE Interactive Conference (pp. 49–52). Online, United States:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) . Retrieved fromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/220165/ (last accessed December 17, 2024). - 16Rambsy, K., Harrison, J., & Newsom, R. (2018). The Black Short Story Dataset—Vol. 1.
https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/5TBANV ; 10.32855/dataset.2024.05.035 - 17Rambsy, K., & Rambsy, H. I. (2020, September 28).
Beginning with a dataset of 300 African American texts . Cultural Front: A Notebook on Literary Art, Digital Humanities and Emerging Ideas. Retrieved fromhttp://www.culturalfront.org/2020/09/beginning-with-dataset-of-300-african.html (last accessed: December 17, 2024).