References
- 1Auderset, S., Greenhill, S. J., DiCanio, C. T., & Campbell, E. W. (2023a). Subgrouping in a ‘dialect continuum’: A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the Mixtecan language family. Journal of Language Evolution, 8(1). DOI: 10.1093/jole/lzad004
- 2Auderset, S., Greenhill, S. J., DiCanio, C. T., & Campbell, E. W. (2023b, June). Supplementary Materials to “Subgrouping in a ‘dialect continuum’: A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the Mixtecan language family” (1.2 ed.). Zenodo. DOI: 10.1093/jole/lzad004
- 3Bakker, D. (2010).
Language sampling . In J. J. Song (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology (pp. 100–127). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0007 - 4Bickel, B. (2007). Typology in the 21 st century: major current developments. Linguistic Typology, 11, 239–251. DOI: 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.018
- 5Bickel, B. (2010).
Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis . In I. Bril (Ed.), Clause-hierarchy and clause-linking: the syntax and pragmatics interface (pp. 51–101). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.121.03bic - 6Bickel, B., Austin, P. K., Bond, O., Nathan, D., & Marten, L. (2011). Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In Proceedings of the conference on language documentation and linguistic theory, 3, 3–13. London:
SOAS . - 7Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2002). Autotypologizing databases and their use in fieldwork. In Proceedings of the international LREC workshop on resources and tools in field linguistics, Las Palmas (Vol. 2627).
- 8Bowern, C. (2018). Computational phylogenetics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 281–296. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034142
- 9Bradley, C. H., & Josserand, J. K. (1982). El protomixteco y sus descendientes. Anales de Antropología, 19(2), 279–343.
- 10Campbell, E. W. (2017a). Otomanguean historical linguistics: Exploring the subgroups. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(7). DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12244
- 11Campbell, E. W. (2017b). Otomanguean historical linguistics: Past, present, and prospects for the future. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(4), 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12240
- 12Campbell, E. W. (2021a).
On Zapotecan glottal stop, and where (not) to reconstruct it . In M. Babel & M. A. Sicoli (Eds.), Contact, structure, and change: A Festschrift in honor of Sarah G. Thomason (pp. 349–382). Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing. - 13Campbell, E. W. (2021b).
Why is tone change still poorly understood, and how might documentation of less studied tone languages help? In P. Epps, D. Law, & N. Pat-El (Eds.), Historical linguistics and endangered languages (pp. 15–40). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429030390-3 - 14Carroll, L. S. (2015). Ixpantepec Nieves Mixtec word prosody (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California San Diego.
- 15Castillo García, R. (2007). Descripción fonológica segmental y tonal del mixteco de Yoloxóchitl, Guerrero (Unpublished master’s thesis). CIESAS, México, D.F.
- 16Cruz, E., & Woodbury, A. C. (2014). Finding a way into a family of tone languages: The story and methods of the Chatino Language Documentation Project. Language documentation & conservation, 8, 490–524.
- 17Dürr, M. (1987). A preliminary reconstruction of the Proto-Mixtec tonal system. Indiana, 11, 19–61.
- 18Gerfen, H. J. (1996). Topics in the phonology and phonetics of Coatzospan Mixtec (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona.
- 19Greenhill, S. J., Heggarty, P., & Gray, R. D. (2020).
Bayesian phylolinguistics . In R. D. Janda, B. D. Joseph, & B. S. Vance (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 2, 226–253. Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118732168.ch11 - 20Hinton, L., Buckley, G., Kramer, M., & Meacham, M. (1991). Preliminary analysis of Chalcatongo Mixtec tone. In J. E. Redden (Ed.), Papers from the American Indian Languages Conference, University of California, Santa Cruz,
July and August 1991 (pp. 147–155).Carbondale: Southern Illinois University . - 21Janda, R. D., & Joseph, B. D. (2003).
On language, change, and language change–or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics . In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 3–180). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1111/b.9781405127479.2004.00002.x - 22Josserand, J. K. (1983). Mixtec dialect history (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tulane University.
- 23Julián Caballero, J. (1999). La Academia de la Lengua Mixteca: espacios de reflexión compartida. Cuadernos del Sur, 14, 129–139.
- 24Kaufman, T. (2006).
Oto-manguean languages . In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (Second Edition, pp. 118–124). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02286-0 - 25Kaufman, T. (in press).
Comparative Oto-Mangean grammar research: Phonology, aspect-mood marking, valency changers, nominalizers on verbs, numerals, pronouns, deictics, interrogatives, adpositionoids, noun classifiers, noun inflexion, compounds, word order, and diversification model . In S. Wichmann (Ed.), Languages and linguistics of Mexico and Northern Central America: a comprehensive guide. De Gruyter Mouton. - 26List, J.-M., Forkel, R., Greenhill, S. J., Rzymski, C., Englisch, J., & Gray, R. D. (2022). Lexibank, a public repository of standardized wordlists with computed phonological and lexical features. Scientific Data, 9(1),
316 . DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01432-0 - 27List, J.-M., Greenhill, S. J., & Gray, R. D. (2017). The potential of automatic word comparison for historical linguistics. PLoS ONE, 12(1),
e0170046 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170046 - 28List, J.-M., Walworth, M., Greenhill, S. J., Tresoldi, T., & Forkel, R. (2018). Sequence comparison in computational historical linguistics. Journal of Language Evolution, 3(2), 130–144. DOI: 10.1093/jole/lzy006
- 29Longacre, R. E. (1957). Proto-Mixtecan. Bloomington: Indiana University.
- 30Longacre, R. E. (1961). Swadesh’s Macro-Mixtecan hypothesis. International Journal of American Linguistics, 27(1), 9–29. DOI: 10.1086/464599
- 31Macaulay, M., & Salmons, J. C. (1995). The phonology of glottalization in Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics, 61(1), 38–61. DOI: 10.1086/466244
- 32Mak, C., & Longacre, R. (1960). Proto-Mixtec phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 26(1), 23–40. DOI: 10.1086/464551
- 33McKendry, I. (2013). Tonal association, prominence and prosodic structure in South-Eastern Nochixtlán Mixtec (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
- 34Mendoza Ruíz, J. (2016). Fonología segmental y patrones tonales del Tu’un Savi de Alcozauca de Guerrero (Unpublished master’s thesis). CIESAS, México, D.F.
- 35Moran, S., Grossman, E., & Verkerk, A. (2021). Investigating diachronic trends in phonological inventories using BDPROTO. Language Resources and Evaluation, 55, 79–103. DOI: 10.1007/s10579-019-09483-3
- 36North, J., & Shields, J. (1977).
Silacayoapan Mixtec phonology . In W. R. Merrifield (Ed.), Studies in otomanguean phonology (pp. 21–33). Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington. - 37Pankratz, L., & Pike, E. V. (1967). Phonology and morphotonemics of Ayutla Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics, 33(4), 287–299. DOI: 10.1086/464980
- 38Pike, E. V., & Cowan, J. H. (1967). Huajuapan Mixtec phonology and morphophonemics. Anthropological Linguistics, 9(5), 1–15.
- 39Rensch, C. R. (1976). Comparative Otomanguean phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- 40Swanton, M. (2021).
Un acercamiento a la ortografía dominica del mixteco de Teposcolula: un enfoque comparativo . In M. Swanton (Ed.), Filología mixteca: Estudios sobre textos virreinales (pp. 1–76). México, DF: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas UNAM. - 41Swanton, M., & Mendoza Ruíz, J. (2021).
Observaciones sobre la diacronía del tono en el Tu’un Savi (mixteco) de Alcozauca de Guerrero . In F. Arellanes & L. Guerrero (Eds.), Estudios lingüísticos y filológicos en lenguas indígenas mexicanas: Celebración de los 30 años del Seminario de Lenguas Indígenas. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - 42Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- 43Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Nichols, J., Hildebrandt, K., Zakharko, T., & Bickel, B. (2022).
Managing AUTOTYP data: Design principles and implementation . In A. L. Berez-Kroeker, B. McDonnell, E. Koller, & L. B. Collister (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0061