Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dutch Author Recognition Test Cover
Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278289. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
  2. 2Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2013). Naambekendheid van fictieschrijvers in Vlaanderen: Resultaten van de auteurstest 2013. Report available at https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4268783/file/4268798.pdf
  3. 3Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant’s Age. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1116. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116
  4. 4Chen, S. Y., & Fang, S. P. (2015). Developing a Chinese version of an Author Recognition Test for college students in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(4), 344360. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12018
  5. 5Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Kyle, K. (2017). Predicting text comprehension, processing, and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 340359. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1296264
  6. 6Dąbrowska, E. (2018). Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition, 178, 222235. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.018
  7. 7De Pessemier, P., & Andries, C. (2009). GL&SCHR Dyslexie bij + 16-jarigen. Test voor Gevorderd Lezen en Schrijven. Antwerp, Belgium: Garant.
  8. 8Eysenck, H. J., & Rachman, S. (1965). The causes and cures of neurosis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited.
  9. 9Finn, S. (1997). Origins of media exposure: Linking personality traits to TV, radio, print, and film use. Communication research, 24(5), 507529. DOI: 10.1177/009365097024005003
  10. 10Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A. (2013). What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370376. DOI: 10.1037/a0034084
  11. 11Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 7478. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
  12. 12Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Warren, S. F., Montgomery, J. K., Greenwood, C. R., Kimbrough Oller, D., … Paul, T. D. (2017). Mapping the early language environment using all day recordings and automated analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 248265. DOI: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0169
  13. 13Hargreaves, I. S., Pexman, P. M., Zdrazilova, L., & Sargious, P. (2012). How a hobby can shape cognition: visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players. Memory & Cognition, 40(1), 17. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0137-5
  14. 14Hartung, F., Burke, M., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2016). Taking perspective: Personal pronouns affect experiential aspects of literary reading. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154732. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154732
  15. 15Hintz, F., Jongman, S. R., Dijkhuis, M., van‘t Hoff, V., Damian, M., Schröder, S., Brysbaert, M., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2018). STAIRS4WORDS: A new adaptive test for assessing receptive vocabulary size in English, Dutch, and German. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing [AMLaP] conference, Berlin (GER).
  16. 16Huysmans, F. (2013). Van woordjes naar wereldliteratuur. De leeswereld van kinderen van 7–15 jaar [From words to world literature. The reading world of children aged 7–15 years]. Retrieved from http://www.lezen.nl/publicaties/van-woordjestot-wereldliteratuur
  17. 17James, A. N., Fraundorf, S. H., Lee, E. K., & Watson, D. G. (2018). Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions? Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 155181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006
  18. 18John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. DOI: 10.1037/t07550-000
  19. 19Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377380. DOI: 10.1126/science.1239918
  20. 20Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2019). Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522531. DOI: 10.1177/1948550618775410
  21. 21Kleijnen, E., Huysmans, F., & Elbers, E. (2015). The role of school libraries in reducing learning disadvantages in migrant children: A literature review. SAGE Open, 5(2), 2158244015580369. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015580369
  22. 22Koopman, E. M. E. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 6279. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008
  23. 23Kraaykamp, G., & Van Eijck, K. (2005). Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 16751688. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.002
  24. 24Lau, S., & Cheung, S. M. (1988). Reading interests of Chinese adolescents: Effects of personal and social factors. International Journal of Psychology, 23(1–6), 695705. DOI: 10.1080/00207598808247794
  25. 25Lee, H., Seong, E., Choi, W., & Lowder, M. W. (2019). Development and assessment of the Korean Author Recognition Test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(7), 18371846. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818814461
  26. 26Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694712. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
  27. 27Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407428. DOI: 10.1515/COMM.2009.025
  28. 28Mar, R. A., & Rain, M. (2015). Narrative fiction and expository nonfiction differentially predict verbal ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(6), 419433. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1069296
  29. 29McManus, I. C., & Furnham, A. (2006). Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 555587. DOI: 10.1348/000712606X101088
  30. 30Menenti, L., Gierhan, S., Segaert, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). Shared language: Overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychological Science, 22, 11731182. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611418347
  31. 31Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
  32. 32Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267296. DOI: 10.1037/a0021890
  33. 33Moore, M., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Reading ability and print exposure: Item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 10951109. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3
  34. 34Oerlemans, W. G., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Why extraverts are happier: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 1122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.02.001
  35. 35Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does Reading a Single Passage of Literary Fiction Really Improve Theory of Mind? An Attempt at Replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46e54. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000064
  36. 36Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 122149. DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2011.628376
  37. 37Rentfrow, P. J., Goldberg, L. R., & Zilca, R. (2011). Listening, watching, and reading: The structure and correlates of entertainment preferences. Journal of Personality, 79(2), 223258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00662.x
  38. 38Rodrigo, V., McQuillan, J., & Krashen, S. (1996). Free voluntary reading and vocabulary knowledge in native speakers of Spanish. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83(2), 648650. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.648
  39. 39Romeo, R. R., Leonard, J. A., Robinson, S. T., West, M. R., Mackey, A. P., Rowe, M. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2018). Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Psychological Science, 29(5), 700710. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617742725
  40. 40Rosenbaum, L. (2018). Assessing individual differences in sentence generation skills: Development and evaluation of a new paradigm. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis. Universitaet Osnabrueck.
  41. 41Samur, D., Luminet, O., & Koole, S. L. (2017). Alexithymia predicts lower reading frequency: The mediating roles of mentalising ability and reading attitude. Poetics, 65, 111. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2017.09.002
  42. 42Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 130144. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
  43. 43Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2004). University student reading preferences in relation to the big five personality dimensions. Reading Psychology, 25(4), 273295. DOI: 10.1080/02702710490522630
  44. 44Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402433. DOI: 10.2307/747605
  45. 45Swift, A., & Ander, S. (2017). Rumors of the Demise of Books Greatly Exaggerated. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/201644/rumors-demise-books-greatly-exaggerated.aspx
  46. 46Vander Beken, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). Studying texts in a second language: The importance of test type. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 10621074. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728917000189
  47. 47Vander Beken, H., Woumans, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). Studying texts in a second language: No disadvantage in long-term recognition memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 826838. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728917000360
  48. 48Vandevyvere, G. (2017). Correlationeel onderzoek naar de relatie tussen leesactiviteit en persoonlijkheid: Lezen introverten meer dan extraverten? Master Thesis Ghent University. Retrieved from https://lib.ugent.be/en/catalog/rug01:002351896
  49. 49van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The effect of reading a short passage of literary fiction on Theory of Mind: A replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 7. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.117
  50. 50Van Steensel, R. (2006). Relations between socio-cultural factors, the home literacy environment and children’s literacy development in the first years of primary education. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 367382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00301.x
  51. 51Weiß, R. H. (2006). Grundintelligenzskala 2 mit Wortschatztest and Zahlenfolgetest [Basic intelligence scale 2 with vocabulary knowledge test and sequential number test]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.95 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 8, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 28, 2020
Published on: Mar 24, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Marc Brysbaert, Longjiao Sui, Nicolas Dirix, Florian Hintz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.