Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examining Whether Semantic Cues Can Affect Felt Heaviness When Lifting Novel Objects Cover

Examining Whether Semantic Cues Can Affect Felt Heaviness When Lifting Novel Objects

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. 1Amazeen, E. L., & Turvey, M. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size–weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 22, 213232. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.213
  2. 2Buckingham, G. (2014). Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes. Exp. Brain Res., 232, 16231629. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3926-9
  3. 3Buckingham, G., Byrne, C. M., Paciocco, J., van Eimeren, L., & Goodale, M. A. (2014). Weightlifting exercise and the size-weight illusion. Atten. Percept. Psychophys, 76, 452459. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0597-8
  4. 4Buckingham, G., Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). Living in A Material World: How Visual Cues to Material Properties Affect the Way That We Lift Objects and Perceive Their Weight. J. Neurophysiol, 102, 31113118. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00515.2009
  5. 5Buckingham, G., & Goodale, M. A. (2010a). Lifting without Seeing: The Role of Vision in Perceiving and Acting upon the Size Weight Illusion. PLoS ONE, 5, e9709. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009709
  6. 6Buckingham, G., & Goodale, M. A. (2010b). The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size–weight illusion. Exp. Brain Res., 205, 283288. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2353-9
  7. 7Buckingham, G., & Goodale, M. A. (2013). Size Matters: A Single Representation Underlies Our Perceptions of Heaviness in the Size-Weight Illusion. PLoS ONE, 8, e54709. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054709
  8. 8Buckingham, G., & MacDonald, A. (2016). The weight of expectation: Implicit, rather than explicit, prior expectations drive the size–weight illusion. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 69, 18311841. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1100642
  9. 9Buckingham, G., Michelakakis, E. E., & Cole, J. (2016a). Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information. J. Neurophysiol., 115, 19461953. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00587.2015
  10. 10Buckingham, G., Michelakakis, E. E., & Rajendran, G. (2016b). The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Perception and Action: Relationships to Autistic Traits. J. Autism Dev. Disord., 46, 17161724. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0
  11. 11Buckingham, G., Ranger, N. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2011a). The material–weight illusion induced by expectations alone. Atten. Percept. Psychophys, 73, 3641. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0007-4
  12. 12Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse expérimentale quelques éléments de la sensation de poids. Arch. Physiol. Norm. Pathol., 3, 122135.
  13. 13da Silva, R. L., Labrecque, D., Caromano, F. A., Higgins, J., & Frak, V. (2018). Manual action verbs modulate the grip force of each hand in unimanual or symmetrical bimanual tasks. PLOS ONE, 13, e0192320. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192320
  14. 14Dijker, A. J. M. (2008). Why Barbie feels heavier than Ken: The influence of size-based expectancies and social cues on the illusory perception of weight. Cognition, 106, 11091125. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.009
  15. 15Dijker, A. J. M. (2014). The role of expectancies in the size-weight illusion: A review of theoretical and empirical arguments and a new explanation. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 111. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0634-1
  16. 16Ernst, M. O. (2009). Perceptual learning: inverting the size-weight illusion. Curr. Biol., 19, R2325. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.039
  17. 17Flanagan, J. R., & Bandomir, C. A. (2000). Coming to grips with weight perception: effects of grasp configuration on perceived heaviness. Percept. Psychophys, 62, 12041219. DOI: 10.3758/BF03212123
  18. 18Flanagan, J. R., & Beltzner, M. A. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nat. Neurosci., 3, 737741. DOI: 10.1038/76701
  19. 19Flanagan, J. R., Bittner, J. P., & Johansson, R. S. (2008). Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights. Curr. Biol., 18, 17421747. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.042
  20. 20Frak, V., Nazir, T., Goyette, M., Cohen, H., & Jeannerod, M. (2010). Grip Force Is Part of the Semantic Representation of Manual Action Verbs. PLOS ONE, 5, e9728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009728
  21. 21Gordon, A. M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1991). Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp. Brain Res., 83, 477482. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229824
  22. 22Grandy, M. S., & Westwood, D. A. (2006). Opposite Perceptual and Sensorimotor Responses to a Size-Weight Illusion. J. Neurophysiol, 95, 38873892. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00851.2005
  23. 23Nakatani, K. (1985). Application of the method of fixed set to the size-weight illusion. Psychol. Res., 47, 223233. DOI: 10.1007/BF00309450
  24. 24Nicolas, S., Ross, H. E., & Murray, D. J. (2012). Charpentier’s papers of 1886 and 1891 on weight perception and the size-weight illusion. Percept. Mot. Skills, 115, 120141. DOI: 10.2466/24.22.27.PMS.115.4.120-141
  25. 25Peters, M. A. K., Ma, W. J., & Shams, L. (2016). The Size-Weight Illusion is not anti-Bayesian after all: a unifying Bayesian account. PeerJ, 4, e2124. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2124
  26. 26Saccone, E. J., & Chouinard, P. A. (2019). The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 26, 7789. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1519-5
  27. 27Saccone, E. J., Landry, O., & Chouinard, P. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of the size-weight and material-weight illusions. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 26, 11951212. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01604-x
  28. 28Schneider, I. K., Parzuchowski, M., Wojciszke, B., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2015). Weighty data: importance information influences estimated weight of digital information storage devices. Front. Psychol., 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01536
  29. 29Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B., & Lakens, D. (2011). Weighty Matters: Importance Literally Feels Heavy. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci., 2, 474478. DOI: 10.1177/1948550610397895
  30. 30Seashore, C. E. (1899). Some psychological statistics II. The material weight illusion. Univ. Iowa Stud. Psychol., 3646.
  31. 31Vicovaro, M., & Burigana, L. (2017). Contribution of surface material and size to the expected versus the perceived weight of objects. Atten. Percept. Psychophys, 79, 306319. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1212-6
  32. 32Vicovaro, M., Ruta, K., & Vidotto, G. (2019). Influence of visually perceived shape and brightness on perceived size, expected weight, and perceived weight of 3D objects. PloS One, 14, e0220149. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220149
  33. 33Zhu, Q., & Bingham, G. P. (2011). Human readiness to throw: the size–weight illusion is not an illusion when picking the best objects to throw. Evol. Hum. Behav., 32, 288293. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.005
  34. 34Zwislocki, J. J., & Goodman, D. A. (1980). Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: a validation. Percept. Psychophys, 28, 2838. DOI: 10.3758/BF03204312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.93 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 21, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 10, 2020
Published on: Jan 31, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Caitlin Elisabeth Naylor, T. J. Power, Gavin Buckingham, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.