We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory

Anastasia Kiyonaga

doi:10.5334/joc.71

Abstract

A vast and diverse literature describes the relationship between working memory and attention. That literature encompasses tests of the interactions between the two functions, comparisons of the processes underlying them, and theoretical formulations of the cognitive constructs. In a recent review, Oberauer (2019) reins in this varied work to create a roadmap for future research. Here, I delineate several additional considerations to guide the evaluation and development of research into working memory and attention. Namely, working memory is a complex construct that can entail many processes and take on several meanings. Research and theory about working memory—and its relation to attention—must consider what particular demands are being tapped, what type of information is being operated on, and what goal is ultimately at stake.

References

Bae, G. Y., & Luck, S. J. (2018). Dissociable Decoding of Spatial Attention and Working Memory from EEG Oscillations and Sustained Potentials. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(2), 409–422. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2860-17.2017
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christophel, T. B., Klink, P. C., Spitzer, B., Roelfsema, P. R., & Haynes, J. D. (2017). The Distributed Nature of Working Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 111–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Constantinidis, C., Funahashi, S., Lee, D., Murray, J. D., Qi, X.-L., Wang, M., & Arnsten, A. F. T. (2018). Persistent Spiking Activity Underlies Working Memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(32), 7020–7028. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2486-17.2018
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2006). Distinct Capacity Limits for Attention and Working Memory Evidence From Attentive Tracking and Visual Working Memory Paradigms. Psychological Science, 17(6), 526–534. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01739.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harrison, W. J., & Bays, P. M. (2018). Visual working memory is independent of the cortical spacing between memoranda. Journal of Neuroscience, 2645–17. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2645-17.2017
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jha, A. P., & Kiyonaga, A. (2010). Working-memory-triggered dynamic adjustments in cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 1036–1042. DOI: 10.1037/a0019337
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson, M. R., Higgins, J. A., Norman, K. A., Sederberg, P. B., Smith, T. A., & Johnson, M. K. (2013). Foraging for Thought An Inhibition-of-Return-Like Effect Resulting From Directing Attention Within Working Memory. Psychological Science. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612466414
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., & Chun, M. M. (2005). Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(45), 16524. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505454102
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiyonaga, A., Dowd, E. W., & Egner, T. (2017). Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(12), 2011–2024. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01174
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2014). The Working Memory Stroop Effect When Internal Representations Clash With External Stimuli. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1619–1629. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614536739
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2016). Center-Surround Inhibition in Working Memory. Current Biology, 26(1), 64–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leavitt, M. L., Mendoza-Halliday, D., & Martinez-Trujillo, J. C. (2017). Sustained Activity Encoding Working Memories: Not Fully Distributed. Trends in Neurosciences, 40(6), 328–346. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lundqvist, M., Herman, P., & Miller, E. K. (2018). Working Memory: Delay Activity, Yes! Persistent Activity? Maybe Not. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(32), 7013–7019. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2485-17.2018
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Magnussen, S., & Greenlee, M. W. (1992). Retention and disruption of motion information in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(1), 151–156. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.151
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mendoza-Halliday, D., & Martinez-Trujillo, J. C. (2017). Neuronal population coding of perceived and memorized visual features in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Nature Communications, 8, 15471. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15471
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberauer, K. (2019). Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1): 36, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.5334/joc.58
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1129–1135. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2187
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rademaker, R. L., Bloem, I. M., De Weerd, P., & Sack, A. T. (2015). The impact of interference on short-term memory for visual orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1650–1665. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000110
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reddy, L., Kanwisher, N. G., & VanRullen, R. (2009). Attention and biased competition in multi-voxel object representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21447–21452. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907330106
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saad, E., & Silvanto, J. (2013). How Visual Short-Term Memory Maintenance Modulates Subsequent Visual Aftereffects. Psychological Science, 24(5), 803–808. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612462140
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scimeca, J. M., Kiyonaga, A., & D’Esposito, M. (2018). Reaffirming the Sensory Recruitment Account of Working Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.12.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sreenivasan, K. K., & Jha, A. P. (2007). Selective Attention Supports Working Memory Maintenance by Modulating Perceptual Processing of Distractors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 32–41. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.32
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woodman, G. F., & Chun, M. M. (2006). The role of working memory and long-term memory in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14(4–8), 808–830. DOI: 10.1080/13506280500197397
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xu, Y. (2017). Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 794–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoon, J. H., Curtis, C. E., & D’Esposito, M. (2006). Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex. NeuroImage, 29(4), 1117–1126. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article