On the Role of Attention in Working Memory for Response Selection in Task Switching

Darryl W. Schneider

doi:10.5334/joc.69

Abstract

Oberauer’s (2019) analysis and related research on how working memory and attention are linked can provide insight regarding how responses are selected in task-switching situations. One mechanism for response selection—the mediated route—categorizes stimuli with respect to both tasks, then activates responses based on instructed category–response associations. The author discusses two proposals for how these associations are represented in working memory, both of which seem consistent with the idea that attention selects or prioritizes the relevant-task associations, enabling accurate response selection. A broader implication of the representation and operation of the mediated route is that nominal task switching might reflect concurrent multitasking within the cognitive system (constrained by attention in working memory), raising the issue of how task switching should be characterized.

References

Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: On the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117–125. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0004-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1325–1335. DOI: 10.1037/a0028148
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006). Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 347–363. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.347
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137–157. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.137
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.411
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 51, 45–100. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberauer, K. (2019). Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1): 36, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.5334/joc.58
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberauer, K., & Hein, L. (2012). Attention to information in working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 164–169. DOI: 10.1177/0963721412444727
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. (2013). Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 157–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.11.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reisenauer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2013). The impact of task rules on distracter processing: Automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli. Psychological Research, 77, 128–138. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0413-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneider, D. W. (2015). Isolating a mediated route for response congruency effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 235–245. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000049
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneider, D. W. (2018). Categorization difficulty modulates the mediated route for response selection in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1958–1967. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1416-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2015). Learning a nonmediated route for response selection in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 43, 837–851. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0507-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425–432. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0117-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

On the Role of Attention in Working Memory for Response Selection in Task Switching

Abstract

Paradigm

My account