Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia Cover

Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia

Open Access
|Feb 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Percentages of errors for different quantities and groups.

QuantityGroup
ControlDevelopmental Dyscalculia
13%2%
22%2%
32%6%
42%5%
510%19%
627%38%
739%50%
843%51%
961%61%
joc-2-1-55-g1.png
Figure 1

A) Examples of stimuli in the experiment. Left column – subitizing range; right column – counting range. B) Example of a typical trial.

joc-2-1-55-g2.png
Figure 2

The alerting effect as a function of group and range. Asterisk (*) marks a significant difference. The alerting effect appears in the subitizing range for both groups (i.e., the difference between the black and the white bars), but in the counting range, there is an alerting effect only for the DD group, and not for the controls.

joc-2-1-55-g3.png
Figure 3

RT as a function of quantity for each group (control vs. DD) with and without alert. Asterisk (*) marks a significant difference. The subitizing range for the DD group was 3 vs. 4 for the control group. The RT slope was steeper for the DD group between quantities 3–4 and 4–5 vs. the control group.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.55 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 13, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 20, 2019
Published on: Feb 4, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Yarden Gliksman, Avishai Henik, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.