Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Instructed and Acquired Contingencies in Response-Inhibition Tasks Cover

Instructed and Acquired Contingencies in Response-Inhibition Tasks

Journal of Cognition
Volume 2 (2019): Issue 1
By: Maisy Best,  Ian McLaren and  Frederick Verbruggen  
Open Access
|Feb 2019

References

  1. 1Adams, R. C., Lawrence, N. S., Verbruggen, F., & Chambers, C. D. (2017). Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols. Appetite, 109, 11–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.014
    Back to article
  2. 2Allom, V., Mullan, B., & Hagger, M. (2015). Does inhibitory control training improve health behaviour? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1051078
    Back to article
  3. 3Aron, A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry, 69, e55–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024
    Back to article
  4. 4Best, M., Lawrence, N. S., Logan, G. D., McLaren, I. P. L., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). Should we stop or should we go? The role of associations and expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 115–137. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000116
    Back to article
  5. 5Best, M., & Verbruggen, F. (under review). Does learning influence the detection of signals in a response-inhibition task? Journal of Cognition.
    Back to article
  6. 6Bestmann, S. (2012). Functional modulation of primary motor cortex during action selection. In: Chen, R., & Rothwell, J. C. (Eds.), Cortical connectivity, 183–205. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45797-9_10
    Back to article
  7. 7Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2009). Computational models for the combination of advice and individual learning. Cognitive Science, 33(2), 206–242. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01010.x
    Back to article
  8. 8Bowditch, W. A., Verbruggen, F., & McLaren, I. P. (2016). Associatively mediated stopping: Training stimulus-specific inhibitory control. Learning & Behavior, 44(2), 162–174. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0196-8
    Back to article
  9. 9Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–6. DOI: 10.1163/156856897X00357
    Back to article
  10. 10Chambers, C. D., Garavan, H., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2009). Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 631–646. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016
    Back to article
  11. 11Chein, J. M., & Schneider, W. (2012). The Brain’s Learning and Control Architecture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 78–84. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411434977
    Back to article
  12. 12Chiu, Y. C., Aron, A. R., & Verbruggen, F. (2012). Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus-stop association: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1908–1918. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00247
    Back to article
  13. 13Cramer, A. O. J., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Waldorp, L. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 640–647. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0913-5
    Back to article
  14. 14Dodds, C. M., Howson, S., Stevens, T., Heinzel, C., Hobbs, M., Muller, U., Verbruggen, F., Morgan, C. J. A., & Zeman, A. (In Preparation). Effects of Methylphenidate on Stopping While Distracted.
    Back to article
  15. 15Doll, B. B., Jacobs, W. J., Sanfey, A. G., & Frank, M. J. (2009). Instructional control of reinforcement learning: A behavioral and neurocomputational investigation. Brain Research, 1299, 74–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.007
    Back to article
  16. 16Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., Chambers, C. D., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 27–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.004
    Back to article
  17. 17Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
    Back to article
  18. 18Gaschler, R., Marewski, J. N., Wenke, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2014). Transferring control demands across incidental learning tasks–stronger sequence usage in serial reaction task after shortcut option in letter string checking. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1388. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01388
    Back to article
  19. 19Houben, K. (2011). Overcoming the urge to splurge: Influencing eating behavior by manipulating inhibitory control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 384–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.008
    Back to article
  20. 20Houben, K., & Jansen, A. (2011). Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite, 56, 345–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.017
    Back to article
  21. 21Houben, K., Nederkoorn, C., Wiers, R. W., & Jansen, A. (2011). Resisting temptation: Decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 116 (1–3), 132–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.011
    Back to article
  22. 22Jahfari, S., Stinear, C. M., Claffey, M., Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Responding with restraint: What are the neurocognitive mechanisms? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1479–92. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21307
    Back to article
  23. 23Jones, A., Di Lemma, L. C. G., Robinson, E., Christiansen, P., Nolan, S., Tudur-Smith, C., & Field, M. (2016). Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness. Appetite, 97, 16–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.013
    Back to article
  24. 24Jones, A., & Field, M. (2013). The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 8–16. DOI: 10.1037/a0030683
    Back to article
  25. 25Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
    Back to article
  26. 26Lawrence, N. S., O’Sullivan, J., Parslow, D., Javaid, M., Adams, R. C., Chambers, C. D., Kos, K., & Verbruggen, F. (2015a). Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake. Appetite, 95, 17–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.009
    Back to article
  27. 27Lawrence, N. S., Verbruggen, F., Morrison, S., Adams, R. C., & Chambers, C. D. (2015b). Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus- specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint. Appetite, 85, 91–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.006
    Back to article
  28. 28Lenartowicz, A., Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3388–3399. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00031
    Back to article
  29. 29Liefooghe, B., Degryse, J., & Theeuwes, M. (2016). Automatic effects of no-go instructions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 232–241. DOI: 10.1037/cep0000080
    Back to article
  30. 30Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
    Back to article
  31. 31Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1142–1151. DOI: 10.1037/a0030409
    Back to article
  32. 32Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., Munteanu, C., & Monsell, S. (2014). Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1580–1602. DOI: 10.1037/a0036552
    Back to article
  33. 33Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3
    Back to article
  34. 34Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
    Back to article
  35. 35Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Jamil, T. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (Version 0.9.11-1). Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/.
    Back to article
  36. 36Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003214
    Back to article
  37. 37Noël, X., Brevers, D., Hanak, C., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). On the automaticity of response inhibition in individuals with alcoholism. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 51, 84–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.01.003
    Back to article
  38. 38Pfeuffer, C. U., Hosp, T., Kimmig, E., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). Defining stimulus representation in stimulus–response associations formed on the basis of task execution and verbal codes. Psychological Research, 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0861-y
    Back to article
  39. 39Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus–response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 328–347. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000317
    Back to article
  40. 40Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations. Acta psychologica, 184, 100–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.001
    Back to article
  41. 41Ramamoorthy, A., & Verguts, T. (2012). Word and deed: A computational model of instruction following. Brain Research, 1439, 54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.025
    Back to article
  42. 42R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
    Back to article
  43. 43Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Segalowitz, S. J., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 129–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.016
    Back to article
  44. 44Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
    Back to article
  45. 45Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology, 52, 83–98. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.83
    Back to article
  46. 46Schevernels, H., Bombeke, K., Van der Borght, L., Hopf, J.-M., Krebs, R. M., & Boehler, C. N. (2015). Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 121, 115–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.023
    Back to article
  47. 47Shanks, D. R. (2010). Learning: From association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273–301. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519
    Back to article
  48. 48Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994). Aging and skill acquisition: Learning performance distinctions. Psychology and Aging, 9, 589–605. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.589
    Back to article
  49. 49Umbach, V. J., Schwager, S., Frensch, P. A., & Gaschler, R. (2012). Does explicit expectation really affect preparation? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00378
    Back to article
  50. 50Veling, H., Aarts, H., & Stroebe, W. (2012). Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods. British Journal of Health Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02092.x
    Back to article
  51. 51Veling, H. P., Aarts, H., & Papies, E. K. (2011). Using stop signals to inhibit dieters’ responses toward palatable foods. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 771–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.08.005
    Back to article
  52. 52Verbruggen, F., Best, M., Bowditch, W. A., Stevens, T., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2014). The inhibitory control reflex. Neuropsychologia, 65, 263–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.014
    Back to article
  53. 53Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008a). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 418–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005
    Back to article
  54. 54Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008b). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649–72. DOI: 10.1037/a0013170
    Back to article
  55. 55Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009a). Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 835–54. DOI: 10.1037/a0012726
    Back to article
  56. 56Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009b). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 647–661. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014
    Back to article
  57. 57Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2017). Control in Response Inhibition. In: Egner, T. (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control, 97–110. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118920497.ch6
    Back to article
  58. 58Verbruggen, F., McAndrew, A., Weidemann, G., Stevens, T., & McLaren, I. P. (2016). Limits of executive control: Sequential effects in predictable environments. Psychological Science, 27(5), 748–757. DOI: 10.1177/0956797616631990
    Back to article
  59. 59Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I. P. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behaviour change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 497–524. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614526414
    Back to article
  60. 60Verbruggen, F., Stevens, T., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: An attentional account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. DOI: 10.1037/a0036542
    Back to article
  61. 61Zandbelt, B. B., Bloemendaal, M., Neggers, S. F., Kahn, R. S., & Vink, M. (2012). Expectations and violations: Delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control. Human Brain Mapping. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22047
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.53 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 5, 2019
Published on: Feb 4, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Cognitive control,
Executive functions,
Learning

© 2019 Maisy Best, Ian McLaren, Frederick Verbruggen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2 (2019): Issue 1Next article