Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Orthographic Neighbourhood Size Effects in Chinese Character Recognition: Small, Inconsistent, and Theoretically Ambiguous Cover

Orthographic Neighbourhood Size Effects in Chinese Character Recognition: Small, Inconsistent, and Theoretically Ambiguous

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802. 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802
  2. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439461. 10.3758/BF03214334
  3. Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International journal of psychological research, 3(2), 1228. 10.21500/20112084.807
  4. Bachmann, M. (2025). Python-levenshtein [Accessed: 2025-09-11]. https://pypi.org/project/python-Levenshtein/
  5. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 148. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  6. Brysbaert, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2016). Aphasia and age of acquisition: Are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasiology, 30(11), 12401263. 10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439
  7. Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 4550. 10.1177/0963721417727521
  8. Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one, 5(6), e10729. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
  9. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of the orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 857. 10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.857
  10. Chen, Y.-P. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? The Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(4), 10241043. 10.1080/713755668
  11. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Attention and performance vi (pp. 535555). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003309734-29
  12. Commission, N. L. (2009). Specification of Common Modern Chinese Character Components and Component Names [现代常用字部件及部件名称规范] (tech. rep. No. GF 0014-2009). Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/ziliao/A19/201001/t20100115_75696.html
  13. DeFrancis, J. (2022) . Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. In Visible Speech. University of Hawaii Press.
  14. Dong, J., Yang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). N400-like effect of stroke-based neighborhood size in Chinese characters. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 120134. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.04.003
  15. Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., et al. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 2746. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  16. Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 776. 10.1037//0278-7393.23.3.776
  17. Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 559576. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2629
  18. Fiebach, C. J., Ricker, B., Friederici, A. D., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Inhibition and facilitation in visual word recognition: Prefrontal contribution to the orthographic neighborhood size effect. Neuroimage, 36(3), 901911. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.004
  19. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (Third). Sage. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/
  20. Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., & Hellwig, F. M. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 781804. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1039
  21. Friedman, L., & Wall, M. (2005). Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. The American Statistician, 59(2), 127136. 10.1198/000313005X41337
  22. Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 87107. 10.1348/000712607X181304
  23. Graham, M. H. (2003). Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology, 84(11), 28092815. 10.1890/02-3114
  24. Grainger, J., O’regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & psychophysics, 45, 189195. 10.3758/BF03210696
  25. Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & psychophysics, 47, 191198. 10.3758/BF03205983
  26. Havens, L. L., & Foote, W. E. (1963). The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 6. 10.1037/h0048690
  27. Hendrix, P., & Sun, C. C. (2021). A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(1), 157. 10.1037/xlm0000819
  28. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O’rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938950. 10.1162/089892902760191153
  29. Hsieh, C.-Y., Lin, W.-C., Li, M.-F., & Wu, J.-T. (2021). The concept of neighborhood underlying the phonetic consistency effect in Chinese character recognition: A four-decade review and beyond. Reading and Writing, 34(5), 12251246. 10.1007/s11145-020-10119-0
  30. Hsieh, C.-Y., Marelli, M., & Rastle, K. (2024). Beyond quantity of experience: Exploring the role of semantic consistency in Chinese character knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 50(5), 819. 10.1037/xlm0001294
  31. Hsu, C.-H., Wu, Y.-N., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Effects of phonological consistency and semantic radical combinability on N170 and P200 in the reading of Chinese phonograms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 603878. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603878
  32. Huang, H.-W., Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-L., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2006). Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words. Neuroreport, 17(10), 10611065. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000224761.77206.1d
  33. Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 299314. 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713
  34. Jaeger, B. (2017). R2glmm: Computes R squared for mixed (multilevel) models [R package version 0.1.2]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=r2glmm. 10.32614/CRAN.package.r2glmm
  35. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis for special types of data. Springer.
  36. Justi, F. R., & Jaeger, A. (2017). Orthographic neighborhood effects in recognition and recall tasks in a transparent orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 565. 10.1037/xlm0000327
  37. kawabata. (2018). CJKVI-IDS Version 18.02.20 [Based on CHISE Database. Accessed April 2026.]. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cjkvi/cjkvi-ids/master/ids.txt
  38. Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). Detecting inherent bias in lexical decision experiments with the ld1nn algorithm. The Mental Lexicon, 6(1), 3452. 10.1075/ml.6.1.02keu
  39. Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287304. 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
  40. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional.
  41. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 126. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  42. Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(2), 119131. 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80001-5
  43. Language and Text Information Management Department. (2013). List of Commonly Used Standard Chinese Characters [Accessed: 2024-05-17]. https://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-08/19/content_2469793.htm
  44. Levenshtein, V. I., et al. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707710.
  45. Li, M.-F., Gao, X.-Y., & Wu, J.-T. (2020). Neighborhood effects in Chinese character recognition: Going beyond phonological perspectives to explain a possible underlying mechanism. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 547570. 10.1007/s11145-019-09973-4
  46. Li, M.-F., Lin, W.-C., Chou, T.-L., Yang, F.-L., & Wu, J.-T. (2015). The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 219236. 10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4
  47. Li, Q.-L., Bi, H.-Y., Wei, T.-Q., & Chen, B.-G. (2011). Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: Orthographic and phonological activations. Acta Psychologica, 136(1), 3541. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.012
  48. Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Diao, J., Cheng, Q., Gao, R., & Mo, L. (2023). Study of the orthographic neighborhood frequency effect on Chinese compound characters. Reading and Writing, 36(10), 27172738. 10.1007/s11145-022-10392-1
  49. Morioka, T., & Wittern, C. (2002). Developping of character object technology with character databases. IPA Result Report. https://gitlab.chise.org/CHISE
  50. O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity, 41(5), 673690. 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  51. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 409. 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.409
  52. Perea, M. (2015). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition and reading. In The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 7687). Oxford University Press.
  53. Perfetti, C. A., & Sandak, R. (2001). Literacy education. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 89758981). Pergamon. 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02387-1
  54. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1142. 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1142
  55. Python Software Foundation. (2024). Python: Programming language.
  56. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876. 10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.876
  57. Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 429459. 10.1080/016909699386149
  58. Siew, C. S. (2018). The orthographic similarity structure of English words: Insights from network science. Applied Network Science, 3(1), 13. 10.1007/s41109-018-0068-1
  59. Snodgrass, J. G., & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 247266. 10.3758/BF03202737
  60. Sproat, R., & Gutkin, A. (2021). The taxonomy of writing systems: How to measure how logographic a system is. Computational Linguistics, 47(3), 477528. 10.1162/coli_a_00409
  61. Stein, R., Frost, R., & Siegelman, N. (2024). HeLP: The Hebrew lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 56(8), 87618783. 10.3758/s13428-024-02502-4
  62. Su, I.-F., Yum, Y. N., & Lau, D. K.-Y. (2023). Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: Ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness. Behavior Research Methods, 55(6), 29893008. 10.3758/s13428-022-01928-y
  63. Sun, C. C., Hendrix, P., Ma, J., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Chinese Lexical Database (CLD): A large-scale lexical database for simplified Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 26062629. 10.3758/s13428-018-1038-3
  64. Sze, W. P., Rickard Liow, S. J., & Yap, M. J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 263273. 10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9
  65. Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761. 10.1037//0278-7393.23.3.761
  66. Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2014). Chinese children’s statistical learning of orthographic regularities: Positional constraints and character structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(4), 291308. 10.1080/10888438.2014.884098
  67. Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., et al. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 659675.
  68. Tulkens, S., Sandra, D., & Daelemans, W. (2018). From strings to other things: Linking the neighborhood and transposition effects in word reading. Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 7585. 10.18653/v1/K18-1008
  69. Unicode Consortium. (2023). The unicode standard, version 15.1.0 [ISBN 978-1-936213-33-7]. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode15.1.0/
  70. Van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 11761190. 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
  71. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 913918. 10.3758/BF03194121
  72. Wang, J., Tian, J., Han, W., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Inhibitory stroke neighbour priming in character recognition and reading in Chinese. Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 21492171. 10.1080/17470218.2014.909507
  73. Wang, M.-Y. (2002). The nature of character-component interaction in Chinese character perception. Psychologia, 45(3), 162175. 10.2117/psysoc.2002.162
  74. Wang, Q., & Zhang, J. (2011). N400 solution effect of Chinese character fragments: An orthographic neighborhood size effect. Brain Research Bulletin, 86(3-4), 179188. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.006
  75. Wang, Y., & Keuleers, E. (2024). Simplified Chinese character distance based on ideographic description sequences. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computation and Written Language (CAWL)@ LREC-COLING 2024, 5966. 10.63317/4pnjzkbdy4on
  76. Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Q., & Keuleers, E. (2025). Simplified Chinese lexicon project: A lexical decision database with 8105 characters and 4864 pseudocharacters. Behavior Research Methods, 57(7), 119. 10.3758/s13428-025-02701-7
  77. Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
  78. William Revelle. (2025). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research [R package version 2.5.6]. Northwestern University. Evanston, Illinois. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  79. Wu, Y., Mo, D., Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 514(2), 164168. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080
  80. Xiong, J., Ju, P., Hou, Y., & Chen, A. (2024). Inhibitory control and dissociation for Chinese real words and pseudowords in the orthographic neighborhood size effect. Reading and Writing, 128. 10.1007/s11145-024-10577-w
  81. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971979. 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
  82. Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2017). Chinese versus English: Insights on cognition during reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 721724. 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.004
  83. Yu, L., Zhang, Q., Ke, M., Han, Y., & Kinoshita, S. (2023). Some neighbors are more interfering: Asymmetric priming by stroke neighbors in Chinese character recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(3), 10651073. 10.3758/s13423-022-02207-9
  84. Yum, Y. N., Law, S.-P., Su, I.-F., Lau, K.-Y. D., & Mo, K. N. (2014). An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 315. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00315
  85. Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart’s neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68(2), B53B62. 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X
  86. Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341368. 10.1080/01690969408402123
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.505 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 33
Submitted on: Feb 2, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 4, 2026
Published on: Jun 19, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Yixia Wang, Peter Hendrix, Emmanuel Keuleers, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.