References
- 1Allen, R. J. (2019). Prioritizing Targets and Minimizing Distraction Within Limited Capacity WM: Commentary on ‘WM and attention; a conceptual analysis and review’ by Klaus Oberauer. Journal of Cognition, 2(1). 10.5334/joc.75
- 2Allen, R. J., & Ueno, T. (2018). Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in WM but with greater vulnerability to interference. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(7), 1731–1743. 10.3758/s13414-018-1543-6
- 3Barth, A., & Schneider, D. (2018). Manipulating the focus of attention in WM: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference. Psychophysiology, 55(7),
e13062 . 10.1111/PSYP.13062 - 4Brown, L. A., Niven, E. H., Logie, R. H., Rhodes, S., & Allen, R. J. (2017). Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: Encoding and suffix interference effects. Memory, 25(2), 261–275. 10.1080/09658211.2016.1156705
- 5Gazzaley, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and WM. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(2), 129–135. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014
- 6Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1176–1194. 10.1162/089892903322598139
- 7Hitch, G. J., Hu, Y., Allen, R. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2018). Competition for the focus of attention in visual WM: Perceptual recency versus executive control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424(1), 64–75. 10.1111/nyas.13631
- 8Hu, Y., Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2016). Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual WM. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78(7), 2164–2175. 10.3758/s13414-016-1106-7
- 9Hu, Y., Hitch, G. J., Baddeley, A. D., Zhang, M., & Allen, R. J. (2014). Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual WM: Evidence from suffix and strategy effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1665–1678. 10.1037/a0037163
- 10Jeanneret, S., Vergauwe, E., Hautekiet, C., & Langerock, N. (2025). What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 10.1177/17470218241299918
- 11Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 193–224. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615
- 12Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43(2), 149–164. 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00402-9
- 13Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2007). Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(6), 1072–1078. 10.3758/BF03193093
- 14Myers, N. E., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2017). Prioritizing information during WM: beyond sustained internal attention. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(6), 449–461. 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010
- 15Oberauer, K. (2019). WM and attention–A conceptual analysis and review. Journal of cognition, 2(1). 10.5334/joc.58
- 16Oberauer, K., & Lin, H.-Y. (2017). An interference model of visual WM. Psychological Review, 124(1), 21–59. 10.1037/rev0000044
- 17Pertzov, Y., Bays, P. M., Joseph, S., & Husain, M. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5),
1224 . 10.1037/a0030947 - 18R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
https://www.R-project.org/ - 19Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of mathematical psychology, 56(5), 356–374. 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
- 20Schneider, D., Barth, A., Getzmann, S., & Wascher, E. (2017). On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG. Biological Psychology, 124, 47–56. 10.1016/J.BIOPSYCHO.2017.01.006
- 21Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). In search of the focus of attention in WM: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5
- 22Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Getting more from visual WM: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6),
890 . 10.1037/xhp0000192 - 23van Moorselaar, D., Gunseli, E., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(JAN), 1–9. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01053
- 24Vergauwe, E., Hautekiet, C., & Langerock, N. (2025). Distractor susceptibility in visual working memory: No evidence for particularly vulnerable mnemonic representations in the focus of attention. Preprint on PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/4yqjt_v2
- 25Zhang, Z., & Lewis-Peacock, J. A. (2023a). Prioritization sharpens working memories but does not protect them from distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 1158–1174. 10.1037/xge0001309
- 26Zhang, Z., & Lewis-Peacock, J. A. (2023b). Bend but don’t break: Prioritization protects WM from displacement but leaves it vulnerable to distortion from distraction. Cognition, 239,
105574 . 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105574