References
- 1Barra, J., Pallier, C., & New, B. (2020). The black superiority effect: Black is taller than gray. Acta Psychologica, 202, 102958. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102958
- 2Brechmann, A., Baumgart, F., & Scheich, H. (2002). Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87(1), 423–433. 10.1152/jn.00187.2001
- 3Broersma, M. (2012). Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and cognitive processes, 27(7–8), 1205–1224. 10.1080/01690965.2012.660170
- 4Cho, T., McQueen, J. M., & Cox, E. A. (2007). Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 210–243. 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.03.003
- 5Connell, K., Hüls, S., Martínez-García, M. T., Qin, Z., Shin, S., Yan, H., & Tremblay, A. (2018). English learners’ use of segmental and suprasegmental cues to stress in lexical access: An Eye-Tracking study. Language Learning, 68(3), 635–668. 10.1111/lang.12288
- 6Cutler, A. (2000). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting, 5(1), 1–23. 10.1075/intp.5.1.02cut
- 7Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 385–400. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90033-1
- 8Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 14(1), 113. 10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
- 9Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 254–262. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003
- 10Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164. 10.1038/nn.4186
- 11Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618. 10.1121/1.1380437
- 12Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001
- 13Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
- 14Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J., & Dijkstra, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 77. 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.77
- 15Frost, R. L., Monaghan, P., & Tatsumi, T. (2017). Domain-general mechanisms for speech segmentation: The role of duration information in language learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 466. 10.1037/xhp0000325
- 16Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(1), 110. 10.1037//0096-1523.6.1.110
- 17Goldinger, S. D., Kleider, H. M., & Shelley, E. (1999). The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Memory & cognition, 27, 328–338. 10.3758/bf03211416
- 18Hall, D. A., Haggard, M. P., Summerfield, A. Q., Akeroyd, M. A., Palmer, A. R., & Bowtell, R. W. (2001). Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(4), 1559–1570. 10.1121/1.1345697
- 19Hart, H. C., Hall, D. A., & Palmer, A. R. (2003). The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl’s gyrus is different for low-and high-frequency tones. Hearing research, 179(1–2), 104–112. 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00100-X
- 20Henninger, F., Shevchenko, Y., Mertens, U. K., Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2021). lab. js: A free, open, online study builder. Behavior Research Methods, 1–18. 10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5
- 21Ishida, M., & Arai, T. (2016). Missing phonemes are perceptually restored but differently by native and non-native listeners. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–10. 10.1186/s40064-016-2479-8
- 22Jäncke, L., Shah, N. J., Posse, S., Grosse-Ryuken, M., & Müller-Gärtner, H. W. (1998). Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 36(9), 875–883. 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00019-0
- 23Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., Ryan, C. S., Muller, D., & Yzerbyt, V. (2018). Analyse des données: une approche par comparaison de modèles. De Boeck Superieur.
- 24Knight, R. A., & Setter, J. (Eds.). (2021).
The Cambridge handbook of phonetics (pp. 159–184). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108644198 - 25Lasota, K. J., Ulmer, J. L., Firszt, J. B., Biswal, B. B., Daniels, D. L., & Prost, R. W. (2003). Intensity-dependent activation of the primary auditory cortex in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of computer-assisted tomography, 27(2), 213–218. 10.1097/00004728-200303000-00018
- 26Linkenauger, S. A., Witt, J. K., Stefanucci, J. K., Bakdash, J. Z., & Proffitt, D. R. (2009). The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(6), 1649. 10.1037/a0016875
- 27McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). Interactive processes in speech perception: The TRACE model In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 58–121).
- 28McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375. 10.1037//0033-295X.88.5.375
- 29Milne, A. E., Bianco, R., Poole, K. C., Zhao, S., Oxenham, A. J., Billig, A. J., & Chait, M. (2021). An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1551–1562. 10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0
- 30New, B., Doré-Mazars, K., Cavézian, C., Pallier, C., & Barra, J. (2016). The letter height superiority illusion. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23, 291–298. 10.3758/s13423-014-0753-8
- 31New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524. 10.3758/BF03195598
- 32Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. 10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
- 33Reber, R., Zimmermann, T. D., & Wurtz, P. (2004). Judgments of duration, figure–ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1105–1114. 10.3758/BF03196839
- 34Reber, R., & Zupanek, N. (2002).
Effects of processing fluency on estimates of probability and frequency . In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), ETC. Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 175–188). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508632.003.0011 - 35Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 275. 10.1037/h0027768
- 36Reingold, E. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1993). Perceptual versus postperceptual mediation of visual context effects: Evidence from the letter-superiority effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(2), 166–178. 10.3758/BF03211727
- 37Röhl, M., & Uppenkamp, S. (2012). Neural coding of sound intensity and loudness in the human auditory system. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 13, 369–379. 10.1007/s10162-012-0315-6
- 38Rossel, P., Peyrin, C., Roux-Sibilon, A., & Kauffmann, L. (2022). It makes sense, so I see it better! Contextual information about the visual environment increases its perceived sharpness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(4), 331. 10.1037/xhp0000993
- 39Samuel, A. G. (1981). The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 112. 10.1037/0096-1523.7.5.1124
- 40Samuel, A. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12(4), 348–351. 10.1111/1467-9280.00364
- 41Samuel, A. G., & Frost, R. (2015). Lexical support for phonetic perception during nonnative spoken word recognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22, 1746–1752. 10.3758/s13423-015-0847-y
- 42Schendel, J. D., & Shaw, P. (1976). A test of the generality of the word-context effect Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 383–393. 10.3758/BF03199397
- 43Shevchenko, Y. (2022). Open Lab: A web application for running and sharing online experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 3118–3125. 10.3758/s13428-021-01776-2
- 44Stecker, G. C., & Hafter, E. R. (2000). An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(6), 3358–3368. 10.1121/1.429407
- 45Wagner, M., Ortiz-Mantilla, S., Rusiniak, M., Benasich, A. A., Shafer, V. L., & Steinschneider, M. (2022). Acoustic-level and language-specific processing of native and non-native phonological sequence onsets in the low gamma and theta-frequency bands. Scientific reports, 12(1), 314. 10.1038/s41598-021-03611-2
- 46Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89(1), 83–90. 10.1016/0001-6918(93)e0072-a
- 47Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of memory and language, 50(1), 1–25. 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0