References
- 1Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. 10.1037/amp0000191
- 2Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
- 3Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Frings, C. (2023). Towards a systematization of brain oscillatory activity in actions. Communications Biology, 6(1),
137 . 10.1038/s42003-023-04531-9 - 4Bonferroni, C. (1936). Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. Pubblicazioni Del R Istituto Superiore Di Scienze Economiche E Commericiali Di Firenze, 8, 3–62.
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570009749360424576 - 5Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. 10.1087/20150211
- 6Davison, G. C. (1968). Systematic desensitization as a counter-conditioning process. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73(2), 91–99. 10.1037/h0025501
- 7De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853–869. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
- 8Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. 10.5334/irsp.82
- 9Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
- 10Frings, C., Beste, C., Benini, E., Möller, M., Dignath, D., Giesen, C. G., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Koch, I., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Mocke, V., Moeller, B., Münchau, A., Parmar, J., Pastötter, B., Pfister, R., Philipp, A. M., Qiu, R., … Schmalbrock, P. (2024). Consensus definitions of perception-action-integration in action control. Communications Psychology, 2(1), 1–5. 10.1038/s44271-023-00050-9
- 11Frings, C., Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Pastötter, B., & Pfister, R. (2023). The relation between learning and stimulus–response binding. Psychological Review. 10.1037/rev0000449
- 12Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. M. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- 13Frings, C., Merz, S., & Hommel, B. (2019). The impact of stimulus uncertainty on attentional control. Cognition, 183, 208–212. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.017
- 14Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. 10.1080/17470210600955645
- 15Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychological Review, 77(5), 419–450. 10.1037/h0029810
- 16Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
- 17Hommel, B. (1998). Event Files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. 10.1080/713756773
- 18Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- 19Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73(4), 512–526. 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
- 20Hommel, B., Chapman, C. S., Cisek, P., Neyedli, H. F., Song, J.-H., & Welsh, T. N. (2019). No one knows what attention is. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2288–2303. 10.3758/s13414-019-01846-w
- 21Hommel, B., & Frings, C. (2020). The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(4), 751–757. 10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
- 22Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- 23Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 1–9. 10.7771/1932-6246.1167
- 24Lamy, D., Frings, C., & Liesefeld, H. R. (2024). Building bridges: visual search meets action control via inter-trial sequence effects. Review of General Psychology, 10892680241232626. 10.1177/10892680241232626
- 25Lawrence, M. A. (2016). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. R Package Version 4.4-0.
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ez/index.html - 26McSweeney, F. K., Hinson, J. M., & Cannon, C. B. (1996). Sensitization–habituation may occur during operant conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 256–271. 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.256
- 27Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77(3), 249–259. 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- 28Moravec, H. (1995). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence (4. print). Harvard Univ. Press.
- 29Münster, N. D., & Frings, C. (2025). From tusk till horn: Modulating feature boundaries in action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication. 10.1037/xhp0001280
- 30Münster, N. D., Schmalbrock, P., Bäumer, T., Hommel, B., Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Frings, C. (2024). Separating binding and retrieval of event files in older adults. Acta Psychologica, 244,
104190 . 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104190 - 31Narhi-Martinez, W., Dube, B., Chen, J., Leber, A. B., & Golomb, J. D. (2024). Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 31(1), 223–233. 10.3758/s13423-023-02339-6
- 32Narhi-Martinez, W., Dube, B., & Golomb, J. D. (2023). Attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 14(1),
e1633 . 10.1002/wcs.1633 - 33Nemeth, M., Frings, C., Schmalbrock, P., & Moeller, B. (2024). No need to execute: Omitted responses still yield response–response binding effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50(12), 1196–1205. 10.1037/xhp0001251
- 34Pastötter, B., & Frings, C. (2018). It’s the other way around! Early modulation of sensory distractor processing induced by late response conflict. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(7), 985–998. 10.1162/jocn_a_01267
- 35Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- 36Peirce, J., & MacAskill, M. (2018). Building experiments in PsychoPy. SAGE Publications.
- 37Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. 10.1080/713752551
- 38Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022). Inter-trial variability of context influences the binding structure in a stimulus-response episode. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 25, 21–13. 10.5334/joc.215
- 39R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/ - 40Rankin, C. H., Abrams, T., Barry, R. J., Bhatnagar, S., Clayton, D. F., Colombo, J., Coppola, G., Geyer, M. A., Glanzman, D. L., Marsland, S., McSweeney, F. K., Wilson, D. A., Wu, C.-F., & Thompson, R. F. (2009). Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(2), 135–138. 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.012
- 41Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
- 42Schmalbrock, P., & Frings, C. (2022). A mighty tool not only in perception: Figure-ground mechanisms control binding and retrieval alike. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 84(7), 2255–2270. 10.3758/s13414-022-02511-5
- 43Schmalbrock, P., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2022). Pooling it all together – the role of distractor pool size on stimulus-response binding. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1–12. 10.1080/20445911.2022.2026363
- 44Schmalbrock, P., Hommel, B., Münchau, A., Beste, C., & Frings, C. (2023). Predictability reduces event file retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(4), 1073–1087. 10.3758/s13414-022-02637-6
- 45Schöpper, L. M., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2022). Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(7), 2219–2235. 10.3758/s13414-022-02538-8
- 46Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. MacMillan.
- 47Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6),
1625 . 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1625 - 48Theeuwes, J., & Failing, M. (2020). Attentional selection: top-down, bottom-up and history-based biases. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108891288
- 49Theeuwes, J., Huang, C., Frings, C., & Van Moorselaar, D. (2024). Statistical learning of motor preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50(2),
152 . 10.1037/xhp0001174 - 50Thompson, R. F., & Spencer, W. A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review, 73(1), 16–43. 10.1037/h0022681
- 51Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
- 52Tukey, J. W. (1977).
Exploratory data analysis . Addison-Wesley series in behavioral science Quantitative methods. Addison-Wesley. - 53Wagner, A. R., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972).
“Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory” . In R. A Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and Learning, London: Academic Press Inc. 301–336. - 54Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018a). How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(4), 860–870. 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z
- 55Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018b). Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 13–17. 10.1037/xhp0000472
- 56Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018c). Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1763–1774. 10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3
- 57Wickham, H., Francois, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2021). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation (Version 1.0.7). 10.1007/978-1-4842-6876-6_1
- 58Won, B. Y., Venkatesh, A., Witkowski, P. P., Banh, T., & Geng, J. J. (2022). Memory precision for salient distractors decreases with learned suppression. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 1–13. 10.3758/s13423-021-01968-z
- 59Zelinsky, G. J., & Bisley, J. W. (2015). The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339, 154–164. 10.1111/nyas.12606