Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/Avoidance Actions on Food Choice Cover

Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/Avoidance Actions on Food Choice

Journal of Cognition
Volume 8 (2025): Issue 1
By: Zhang Chen,  Pieter Van Dessel,  Jordi Serverius,  Daxun Zhu and  Bernd Figner  
Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. 1Adams, R. C., Button, K. S., Hickey, L., Morrison, S., Smith, A., Bolus, W., Coombs, E., Randolph, S., Hunt, R., Kim, D., Chambers, C. D., & Lawrence, N. S. (2021). Food-related inhibitory control training reduces food liking but not snacking frequency or weight in a large healthy adult sample. Appetite, 167, 105601. 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105601
    Back to article
  2. 2Allom, V., & Mullan, B. (2015). Two inhibitory control training interventions designed to improve eating behaviour and determine mechanisms of change. Appetite, 89, 282–290. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.022
    Back to article
  3. 3Armel, K. C., Beaumel, A., & Rangel, A. (2008). Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(5), 396–403. 10.1017/S1930297500000413
    Back to article
  4. 4Aulbach, M. B., Knittle, K., & Haukkala, A. (2019). Implicit process interventions in eating behaviour: A meta-analysis examining mediators and moderators. Health Psychology Review, 13(2), 179–208. 10.1080/17437199.2019.1571933
    Back to article
  5. 5Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    Back to article
  6. 6Becker, D., Jostmann, N. B., Wiers, R. W., & Holland, R. W. (2015). Approach avoidance training in the eating domain: Testing the effectiveness across three single session studies. Appetite, 85, 58–65. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.017
    Back to article
  7. 7Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384–389. 10.1037/h0041006
    Back to article
  8. 8Breslin, P. A. (2013). An Evolutionary Perspective on Food and Human Taste. Current Biology, 23(9), R409–R418. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.010
    Back to article
  9. 9Bürkner, P.-C. (2022). Brms: Bayesian regression models using stan [R package version 2.18.0]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=brms
    Back to article
  10. 10Carbine, K. A., Muir, A. M., Allen, W. D., LeCheminant, J. D., Baldwin, S. A., Jensen, C. D., Kirwan, C. B., & Larson, M. J. (2021). Does inhibitory control training reduce weight and caloric intake in adults with overweight and obesity? A pre-registered, randomized controlled event-related potential (ERP) study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 136, 103784. 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103784
    Back to article
  11. 11Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do Approach-Avoidance Actions Create Attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22–29. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
    Back to article
  12. 12Chen, Z., Holland, R., Quandt, J., Dijksterhuis, A., & Veling, H. (2021). How Preference Change Induced by Mere Action Versus Inaction Persists Over Time. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(1), 201–237. 10.31219/osf.io/b495y
    Back to article
  13. 13Chen, Z., Holland, R. W., Quandt, J., Dijksterhuis, A., & Veling, H. (2019). When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 721–740. 10.1037/pspa0000158
    Back to article
  14. 14Chen, Z., & Van Dessel, P. (2024). Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/Avoidance Actions on Stimulus Evaluation. Open Mind, 8, 898–923. 10.1162/opmi_a_00151
    Back to article
  15. 15Chen, Z., & Veling, H. (2022). Toward a better understanding of durable behavior change by food Go/NoGo training. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48, 101212. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101212
    Back to article
  16. 16Chen, Z., Veling, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Holland, R. W. (2016). How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1687–1701. 10.1037/xge0000236
    Back to article
  17. 17Chen, Z., Veling, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Holland, R. W. (2018). Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect. Appetite, 124, 99–110. 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.024
    Back to article
  18. 18Chiu, Y.-C., & Egner, T. (2015a). Inhibition-Induced Forgetting Results from Resource Competition between Response Inhibition and Memory Encoding Processes. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(34), 11936–11945. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-15.2015
    Back to article
  19. 19Chiu, Y.-C., & Egner, T. (2015b). Inhibition-Induced Forgetting: When More Control Leads to Less Memory. Psychological Science, 26(1), 27–38. 10.1177/0956797614553945
    Back to article
  20. 20De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 189–206. 10.1080/02699930125883
    Back to article
  21. 21de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
    Back to article
  22. 22Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(2), 193–216. 10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9
    Back to article
  23. 23Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 218–235. 10.1037/a0015220
    Back to article
  24. 24Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262–281. 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
    Back to article
  25. 25Enisman, M., Shpitzer, H., & Kleiman, T. (2021). Choice changes preferences, not merely reflects them: A meta-analysis of the artifact-free free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(1), 16–29. 10.1037/pspa0000263
    Back to article
  26. 26Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
    Back to article
  27. 27Forman, E. M., Manasse, S. M., Dallal, D. H., Crochiere, R. J., Loyka, C. M., Butryn, M. L., Juarascio, A. S., & Houben, K. (2019). Computerized neurocognitive training for improving dietary health and facilitating weight loss. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 42(6), 1029–1040. 10.1007/s10865-019-00024-5
    Back to article
  28. 28Gabry, J., & Češnovar, R. (2022). Cmdstanr: R interface to cmdstan [https://mc-stan.org/cmdstanr/].
    Back to article
  29. 29Gabry, J., & Mahr, T. (2022). Bayesplot: Plotting for bayesian models [R package version 1.10.0]. https://mc-stan.org/bayesplot/
    Back to article
  30. 30Guitart-Masip, M., Duzel, E., Dolan, R., & Dayan, P. (2014). Action versus valence in decision making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 194–202. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.003
    Back to article
  31. 31Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1980). Restrained eating. In A. J. Stunkard (Ed.), Obesity (pp. 208–225). Saunders.
    Back to article
  32. 32Hope, R. M. (2022). Rmisc: Ryan miscellaneous [R package version 1.5.1]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc
    Back to article
  33. 33Houben, K. (2023). How does Go/No-Go training lead to food devaluation? Separating the effects of motor inhibition and response valence. Cognition and Emotion, 1–14. 10.1080/02699931.2023.2208339
    Back to article
  34. 34Houben, K., & Aulbach, M. (2023). Is there a difference between stopping and avoiding? A review of the mechanisms underlying Go/No-Go and Approach-Avoidance training for food choice. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 49, 101245. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101245
    Back to article
  35. 35Itzkovitch, A., Bar Or, M., & Schonberg, T. (2022). Cue-approach training for food behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 47, 101202. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101202
    Back to article
  36. 36JASP Team. (2024). JASP (Version 0.19.0)[Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
    Back to article
  37. 37Johannes, N., Buijzen, M., & Veling, H. (2021). Beyond inhibitory control training: Inactions and actions influence smartphone app use through changes in explicit liking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(3), 431–445. 10.1037/xge0000888
    Back to article
  38. 38Kassambara, A. (2023). Ggpubr: Ggplot2 based publication ready plots [R package version 0.6.0]. https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr/
    Back to article
  39. 39Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 957–971. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
    Back to article
  40. 40Kay, M. (2022). Tidybayes: Tidy data and geoms for bayesian models [R package version 3.0.2]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidybayes
    Back to article
  41. 41Laham, S. M., Kashima, Y., Dix, J., Wheeler, M., & Levis, B. (2014). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition and Emotion, 28(6), 1119–1126. 10.1080/02699931.2013.867833
    Back to article
  42. 42Larsen, J. K., Hollands, G. J., Moritz, S., Wiers, R. W., & Veling, H. (2024). How can imaginal retraining for modifying food craving be improved? Appetite, 202, 107639. 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107639
    Back to article
  43. 43Lawrence, N. S., O’Sullivan, J., Parslow, D., Javaid, M., Adams, R. C., Chambers, C. D., Kos, K., & Verbruggen, F. (2015). Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake. Appetite, 95, 17–28. 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.009
    Back to article
  44. 44Liu, H., Holland, R. W., & Veling, H. (2023). When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing. Appetite, 106583. 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106583
    Back to article
  45. 45Lüdecke, D. (2022). Sjplot: Data visualization for statistics in social science [R package version 2.8.12]. https://strengejacke.github.io/sjPlot/
    Back to article
  46. 46Makowski, D., Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Wilson, M. D., & Wiernik, B. M. (2022). Bayestestr: Understand and describe bayesian models and posterior distributions [R package version 0.13.0]. https://easystats.github.io/bayestestR/
    Back to article
  47. 47Memarian, S., Moradi, A., Hasani, J., & Mullan, B. (2021). Can sweet food-specific inhibitory control training via a mobile application improve eating behavior in children with obesity? British Journal of Health Psychology, bjhp.12566. 10.1111/bjhp.12566
    Back to article
  48. 48Moritz, S., Paulus, A. M., Hottenrott, B., Weierstall, R., Gallinat, J., & Kühn, S. (2019). Imaginal retraining reduces alcohol craving in problem drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 64, 158–166. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.04.001
    Back to article
  49. 49Najberg, H., Rigamonti, M., Mouthon, M., & Spierer, L. (2021). Modifying food items valuation and weight with gamified executive control training. Royal Society Open Science, 8(5), 191288. 10.1098/rsos.191288
    Back to article
  50. 50Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371–391). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9781410606853-22
    Back to article
  51. 51Pfister, R. (2021). Variability of Bayes Factor estimates in Bayesian Analysis of Variance. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 17(1), 40–45. 10.20982/tqmp.17.1.p040
    Back to article
  52. 52Porter, L., Bailey-Jones, C., Priudokaite, G., Allen, S., Wood, K., Stiles, K., Parvin, O., Javaid, M., Verbruggen, F., & Lawrence, N. (2018). From cookies to carrots; the effect of inhibitory control training on children’s snack selections. Appetite, 124, 111–123. 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.010
    Back to article
  53. 53Quandt, J., Holland, R. W., Chen, Z., & Veling, H. (2019). The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(8), 1119–1133. 10.1037/xhp0000659
    Back to article
  54. 54R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    Back to article
  55. 55Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 105–120. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
    Back to article
  56. 56Ripley, B. (2022). Mass: Support functions and datasets for venables and ripley’s mass [R package version 7.3-58.1]. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/
    Back to article
  57. 57Schonberg, T., Bakkour, A., Hover, A. M., Mumford, J. A., Nagar, L., Perez, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Changing value through cued approach: An automatic mechanism of behavior change. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 625–630. 10.1038/nn.3673
    Back to article
  58. 58Schonberg, T., & Katz, L. N. (2020). A Neural Pathway for Nonreinforced Preference Change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 504–514. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.04.002
    Back to article
  59. 59Serfas, B. G., Florack, A., Büttner, O. B., & Voegeding, T. (2017). What does it take for sour grapes to remain sour? Persistent effects of behavioral inhibition in go/no-go tasks on the evaluation of appetitive stimuli. Motivation Science, 3(1), 1–18. 10.1037/mot0000051
    Back to article
  60. 60Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2022). Afex: Analysis of factorial experiments [R package version 1.2-0]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
    Back to article
  61. 61Smith, C. T., Calanchini, J., Hughes, S., Van Dessel, P., & De Houwer, J. (2020). The impact of instruction- and experience-based evaluative learning on IAT performance: A Quad model perspective. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 21–41. 10.1080/02699931.2019.1592118
    Back to article
  62. 62Stice, E., Yokum, S., Veling, H., Kemps, E., & Lawrence, N. S. (2017). Pilot test of a novel food response and attention training treatment for obesity: Brain imaging data suggest actions shape valuation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 94, 60–70. 10.1016/j.brat.2017.04.007
    Back to article
  63. 63Tzavella, L., Lawrence, N. S., Button, K. S., Hart, E. A., Holmes, N. M., Houghton, K., Badkar, N., Macey, E., Braggins, A.-J., Murray, F. C., Chambers, C. D., & Adams, R. C. (2021). Effects of go/no-go training on food-related action tendencies, liking and choice. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), 210666. 10.1098/rsos.210666
    Back to article
  64. 64Van Den Bergh, D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Aust, F. (2023). Bayesian Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance: An Updated Methodology Implemented in JASP. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(2), 25152459231168024. 10.1177/25152459231168024
    Back to article
  65. 65Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., & Gast, A. (2016). Approach–Avoidance Training Effects Are Moderated by Awareness of Stimulus–Action Contingencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(1), 81–93. 10.1177/0146167215615335
    Back to article
  66. 66Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., Roets, A., & Smith, C. T. (2020). On the effectiveness of approach-avoidance instructions and training for changing evaluations of social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), e1–e14. 10.1037/pspa0000189
    Back to article
  67. 67Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., & Smith, C. T. (2015). Instruction-Based Approach-Avoidance Effects: Changing Stimulus Evaluation via the Mere Instruction to Approach or Avoid Stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 62(3), 161–169. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000282
    Back to article
  68. 68Van Dessel, P., De Houwer, J., Roets, A., & Gast, A. (2016). Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), e1–e15. 10.1037/pspa0000039
    Back to article
  69. 69Van Dessel, P., Eder, A. B., & Hughes, S. (2018). Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1224–1241. 10.1037/xlm0000514
    Back to article
  70. 70Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2018a). Consequence-Based Approach-Avoidance Training: A New and Improved Method for Changing Behavior. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1899–1910. 10.1177/0956797618796478
    Back to article
  71. 71Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., & De Houwer, J. (2018b). How Do Actions Influence Attitudes? An Inferential Account of the Impact of Action Performance on Stimulus Evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 108886831879573. 10.1177/1088868318795730
    Back to article
  72. 72Van Dessel, P., Hughes, S., Perugini, M., Smith, C. T., Mao, Z.-F., & De Houwer, J. (2025). The role of awareness and demand in evaluative learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 10.1037/pspa0000423
    Back to article
  73. 73Vandenbosch, K., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach–avoid training. Cognition and Emotion, 25(7), 1311–1330. 10.1080/02699931.2011.596819
    Back to article
  74. 74Vehtari, A., Gabry, J., Magnusson, M., Yao, Y., Bürkner, P.-C., Paananen, T., & Gelman, A. (2022). Loo: Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation and waic for bayesian models [R package version 2.5.1]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=loo
    Back to article
  75. 75Veling, H., Aarts, H., & Stroebe, W. (2013a). Stop signals decrease choices for palatable foods through decreased food evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00875
    Back to article
  76. 76Veling, H., Aarts, H., & Stroebe, W. (2013b). Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18(2), 354–368. 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02092.x
    Back to article
  77. 77Veling, H., Becker, D., Liu, H., Quandt, J., & Holland, R. W. (2022). How go/no-go training changes behavior: A value-based decision-making perspective. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 47, 101206. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101206
    Back to article
  78. 78Veling, H., Chen, Z., Tombrock, M. C., Verpaalen, I. A. M., Schmitz, L. I., Dijksterhuis, A., & Holland, R. W. (2017). Training impulsive choices for healthy and sustainable food. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(2), 204–215. 10.1037/xap0000112
    Back to article
  79. 79Veling, H., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1013–1019. 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.004
    Back to article
  80. 80Veling, H., Lawrence, N. S., Chen, Z., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., & Holland, R. W. (2017). What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda. Current Addiction Reports, 4(1), 35–41. 10.1007/s40429-017-0131-5
    Back to article
  81. 81Veling, H., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Aarts, H., & Stroebe, W. (2014). Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet. Effects on body weight. Appetite, 78, 102–109. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.014
    Back to article
  82. 82Veling, H., Verpaalen, I. A., Liu, H., Mosannenzadeh, F., Becker, D., & Holland, R. W. (2021). How can food choice best be trained? Approach-avoidance versus go/no-go training. Appetite, 163, 105226. 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105226
    Back to article
  83. 83Verbruggen, F., Best, M., Bowditch, W. A., Stevens, T., & McLaren, I. P. (2014). The inhibitory control reflex. Neuropsychologia, 65, 263–278. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.014
    Back to article
  84. 84Vermeylen, L., Wisniewski, D., González-García, C., Hoofs, V., Notebaert, W., & Braem, S. (2020). Shared Neural Representations of Cognitive Conflict and Negative Affect in the Medial Frontal Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(45), 8715–8725. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1744-20.2020
    Back to article
  85. 85Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E.-J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
    Back to article
  86. 86Wickham, H. (2022). Tidyverse: Easily install and load the tidyverse [R package version 1.3.2]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
    Back to article
  87. 87Woud, M. L., Maas, J., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach–avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 738–744. 10.1080/20445911.2013.817413
    Back to article
  88. 88Wu, Q., Xia, H., Shields, G. S., Nie, H., Li, J., Chen, H., & Yang, Y. (2023). Neural correlates underlying preference changes induced by food Go/No-Go training. Appetite, 186, 106578. 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106578
    Back to article
  89. 89Xie, Y. (2022). Knitr: A general-purpose package for dynamic report generation in r [R package version 1.41]. https://yihui.org/knitr/
    Back to article
  90. 90Yang, Y., Morys, F., Wu, Q., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2021). Pilot study of food-specific go/no-go training for overweight individuals: Brain imaging data suggest inhibition shapes food evaluation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 18(1), nsab137. 10.1093/scan/nsab137
    Back to article
  91. 91Yang, Y., Qi, L., Morys, F., Wu, Q., & Chen, H. (2022). Food-Specific Inhibition Training for Food Devaluation: A Meta-Analysis. Nutrients, 14(7), 1363. 10.3390/nu14071363
    Back to article
  92. 92Yang, Y., Shields, G. S., Wu, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, H., & Guo, C. (2019). Cognitive training on eating behaviour and weight loss: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 20(11), 1628–1641. 10.1111/obr.12916
    Back to article
  93. 93Zhu, H. (2021). Kableextra: Construct complex table with kable and pipe syntax [R package version 1.3.4]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=kableExtra
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.436 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 12, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2025
Published on: Mar 5, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
go/no-go,
approach/avoidance,
choice,
action execution,
action,
interpretation,
Registered Report

© 2025 Zhang Chen, Pieter Van Dessel, Jordi Serverius, Daxun Zhu, Bernd Figner, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2025): Issue 1Next article