References
- 1Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1497), 1225–1232. 10.1098/rspb.2002.1998
- 2Azaad, S., Laham, S. M., & Shields, P. (2019). A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect. Cognition, 190, 105–127. 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2019.04.028
- 3Bach, P., Knoblich, G., Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Prinz, W. (2005). Action Comprehension: Deriving Spatial and Functional Relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 465–479. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.465
- 4Bar, M. (2004).
Visual objects in context . In Nature Reviews Neuroscience (Vol. 5, Issue 8, pp. 617–629). Nature Publishing Group. 10.1038/nrn1476 - 5Binkofski, F., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Two action systems in the human brain. Brain and Language, 127(2), 222–229. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.007
- 6Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Natraj, N., & Wheaton, L. A. (2012). One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts. Brain and Cognition, 80(1), 64–73. 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.007
- 7Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(JUNE), 144974. 10.3389/FNHUM.2015.00351/BIBTEX
- 8Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 26(2), 211–243. 10.1111/J.2517-6161.1964.TB00553.X
- 9Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 341–358. 10.1037/a0017606
- 10Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Time Course of Motor Affordances Evoked by Pictured Objects and Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 53–68. 10.1037/xhp0000431
- 11Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & van Noordenne, M. (2021). Motor representations evoked by objects under varying action intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(1), 53–80. 10.1037/xhp0000876
- 12Buxbaum, L. J. (2001). Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase, 7(6), 445–458. 10.1093/NEUCAS/7.6.445
- 13Carr, T. H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R. D., & Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 757–777. 10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.757
- 14Cho, D. (Tobin), & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 853–861. 10.1037/a0019328
- 15Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 737–749. 10.1037/a0021934
- 16Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2013). Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding. Psychological Research, 77(5), 618–636. 10.1007/s00426-012-0458-4
- 17Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 10.4324/9780203771587
- 18Colman, H. A., Remington, R. W., & Kritikos, A. (2017). Handedness and Graspability Modify Shifts of Visuospatial Attention to Near-Hand Objects. PLOS ONE, 12(1),
e0170542 . 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0170542 - 19Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45.
https://doaj.org/article/dd17c4ccc4684c9da60c02f3864d09e6 - 20Cousineau, D., Goulet, M. A., & Harding, B. (2021). Summary Plots With Adjusted Error Bars: The superb Framework With an Implementation in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3). 10.1177/25152459211035109
- 21Couth, S., Gowen, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2014). Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 855–864. 10.1007/s00221-013-3798-4
- 22Davare, M., Rothwell, J. C., & Lemon, R. N. (2010). Causal Connectivity between the Human Anterior Intraparietal Area and Premotor Cortex during Grasp. Current Biology, 20(2), 176–181. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.063
- 23Davare, M., Zénon, A., Desmurget, M., & Olivier, E. (2015). Dissociable contribution of the parietal and frontal cortex to coding movement direction and amplitude. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(MAY), 1–12. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00241
- 24Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146/METRICS
- 25Federico, G., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2019). Tool and object affordances: An ecological eye-tracking study. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103582. 10.1016/J.BANDC.2019.103582
- 26Federico, G., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2020). Looking to recognise: the pre-eminence of semantic over sensorimotor processing in human tool use. Scientific Reports 2020 10:1, 10(1), 1–16. 10.1038/s41598-020-63045-0
- 27Goslin, J., Dixon, T., Fischer, M. H., Cangelosi, A., & Ellis, R. (2012). Electrophysiological Examination of Embodiment in Vision and Action. Psychological Science, 23(2), 152–157. 10.1177/0956797611429578
- 28Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. (2008). Integrated Contextual Representation for Objects’ Identities and Their Locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 371–388. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20027
- 29Kaiser, D., Stein, T., & Peelen, M. V. (2014). Object grouping based on real-world regularities facilitates perception by reducing competitive interactions in visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(30), 11217–11222. 10.1073/PNAS.1400559111/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.201400559SI.PDF
- 30Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility–A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270. 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- 31Kourtis, D., & Vingerhoets, G. (2015). Perceiving objects by their function: An EEG study on feature saliency and prehensile affordances. Biological Psychology, 110(September), 138–147. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.017
- 32Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 48–55. 10.1162/08989290051137594
- 33Lesourd, M., Servant, M., Baumard, J., Reynaud, E., Ecochard, C., Medjaoui, F. T., Bartolo, A., & Osiurak, F. (2021). Semantic and action tool knowledge in the brain: identifying common and distinct networks. Neuropsychologia, 159, 107918. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107918
- 34Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766. 10.1016/J.JESP.2013.03.013
- 35Milner, A. D. (2017). How do the two visual streams interact with each other? Experimental Brain Research, 235(5), 1297–1308. 10.1007/s00221-017-4917-4
- 36Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
- 37Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
- 38Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y., & Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 403–417. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014
- 39Pavese, A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition, 9(4–5), 559–590. 10.1080/13506280143000584
- 40Pellicano, A., & Binkofski, F. (2021). The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances. Psychological Research, 85(3), 1234–1247. 10.1007/s00426-020-01296-2
- 41Pellicano, A., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2017). Editorial: Bridging the theories of affordances and limb apraxia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 252969. 10.3389/FNHUM.2017.00148/BIBTEX
- 42Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2190–2201. 10.1080/17470218.2010.486903
- 43Pellicano, A., Koch, I., & Binkofski, F. (2017). Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(9), 1647–1666. 10.1037/xhp0000414
- 44Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Binkofski, F., Rubichi, S., Iani, C., & Nicoletti, R. (2019). The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account. Psychological Research, 83(7), 1383–1399. 10.1007/s00426-018-1009-4
- 45Pellicano, A., Thill, S., Ziemke, T., & Binkofski, F. (2011). Affordances, adaptive tool use and grounded cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(APR), 10569. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00053
- 46Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the Concept of Affordance Add Anything to Explanations of Stimulus–Response Compatibility Effects? Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory, 60, 227–266. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800090-8.00006-8
- 47R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/ - 48Reynaud, E., Lesourd, M., Navarro, J., & Osiurak, F. (2016). On the neurocognitive origins of human tool use : A critical review of neuroimaging data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 64, 421–437. 10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2016.03.009
- 49Roberts, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system. NeuroImage, 52(4), 1541–1548. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.044
- 50Simon, J. R. (1990). The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing (pp. 31–86). 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61218-2
- 51Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830–846. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
- 52Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Visual grouping in human parietal cortex.
www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0705618104 - 53Yoon, E. Y., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2010). The paired-object affordance effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 812–824. 10.1037/a0017175